Minimal important difference of the 12-item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS) 2.0 in persons with chronic low back pain

被引:0
|
作者
Wong, Jessica J. [1 ,2 ]
Hogg-Johnson, Sheilah [1 ,3 ,4 ]
De Groote, Wouter [5 ]
Cwirlej-Sozanska, Agnieszka [6 ,7 ]
Garin, Olatz [8 ,9 ]
Ferrer, Montse [8 ,9 ,10 ]
Acuna, angels Pont [8 ,9 ]
Cote, Pierre [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Ontario Tech Univ, Inst Disabil & Rehabil Res, Fac Hlth Sci, 2000 Simcoe St North, Oshawa, ON L1G 0C5, Canada
[2] Canadian Mem Chiropract Coll, Grad Studies, 6100 Leslie St, Toronto, ON M2H 3J1, Canada
[3] Canadian Mem Chiropract Coll, Dept Res & Innovat, 6100 Leslie St, Toronto, ON M2H 3J1, Canada
[4] Univ Toronto, Dalla Lana Sch Publ Hlth, 155 Coll St Room 500, Toronto, ON M5T 3M7, Canada
[5] Dept Noncommunicable Dis, Rehabil Programme, Sensory Funct Disabil & Rehabil Unit, Ave Appia 20, CH-1211 Geneva, Switzerland
[6] Univ Rzeszow, Inst Hlth Sci, Coll Med Sci, Rejtana St 16C, PL-35959 Rzeszow, Poland
[7] Rzeszow Univ, Ctr Innovat Res Med & Nat Sci, Lab Geronto Prophylaxis, Warzywna St 1A, PL-35310 Rzeszow, Poland
[8] IMIM Hosp Mar, Hlth Serv Res Unit, C Dr Aiguader,88, Barcelona 08003, Spain
[9] CIBER Epidemiol & Salud Publ CIBERESP, Ave Monforte Lemos 3-5, Pabellon 11 Planta 0, Madrid 28029, Spain
[10] Univ Autonoma Barcelona, Ronda Univ,21, Barcelona 08007, Spain
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule; Low back pain; Minimal important difference; Functioning; Disability; Measurement; SF-36; RESPONSIVENESS; VERSION; QUESTIONNAIRE;
D O I
10.1186/s12998-023-00521-0
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
BackgroundThe World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 12-item survey (WHODAS-12) is a questionnaire developed by the WHO to measure functioning across health conditions, cultures, and settings. WHODAS-12 consists of a subset of the 36 items of WHODAS-2.0 36-item questionnaire. Little is known about the minimal important difference (MID) of WHODAS-12 in persons with chronic low back pain (LBP), which would be useful to determine whether rehabilitation improves functioning to an extent that is meaningful for people experiencing the condition. Our objective was to estimate an anchor-based MID for WHODAS-12 questionnaire in persons with chronic LBP.MethodsWe analyzed data from two cohort studies (identified in our previous systematic review) conducted in Europe that measured functioning using the WHODAS-36 in adults with chronic LBP. Eligible participants were adults with chronic LBP with scores on another measure as an anchor to indicate participants with small but important changes in functioning over time [Short-form-36 Physical Functioning (SF36-PF) or Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)] at baseline and follow-up (study 1: 3-months post-treatment; study 2: 1-month post-discharge from hospital). WHODAS-12 scores were constructed as sums of the 12 items (scored 0-4), with possible scores ranging from 0 to 48. We calculated the mean WHODAS-12 score in participants who achieved a small but meaningful improvement on SF36-PF or ODI at follow-up. A meaningful improvement was an MID of 4-16 on ODI or 5-16 on SF36-PF.ResultsOf 70 eligible participants in study 1 (mean age = 54.1 years, SD = 14.7; 69% female), 18 achieved a small meaningful improvement based on SF-36 PF. Corresponding mean WHODAS-12 change score was - 3.22/48 (95% CI -4.79 to -1.64). Of 89 eligible participants in study 2 (mean age = 65.5 years, SD = 11.5; 61% female), 50 achieved a small meaningful improvement based on ODI. Corresponding mean WHODAS-12 change score was - 5.99/48 (95% CI - 7.20 to -4.79).ConclusionsUsing an anchor-based approach, the MID of WHODAS-12 is estimated at -3.22 (95% CI -4.79 to -1.64) or -5.99 (95% CI - 7.20 to -4.79) in adults with chronic LBP. These MID values inform the utility of WHODAS-12 in measuring functioning to determine whether rehabilitation or other health services achieve a minimal difference that is meaningful to patients with chronic LBP.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Minimal important difference of the 12-item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS) 2.0 in persons with chronic low back pain
    Jessica J. Wong
    Sheilah Hogg-Johnson
    Wouter De Groote
    Agnieszka Ćwirlej-Sozańska
    Olatz Garin
    Montse Ferrer
    Àngels Pont Acuña
    Pierre Côté
    Chiropractic & Manual Therapies, 31
  • [2] Correlation between Oswestry disability index and 12-item self-administered version of World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0) in patients with chronic low back pain
    Barlund, Esa T.
    Katajapuu, Niina K.
    Paltamaa, Jaana P.
    Saltychev, Mikhail M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION RESEARCH, 2021, 44 (02) : 170 - 172
  • [3] Validity of the 12-item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) in individuals with Huntington disease (HD)
    Carlozzi, Noelle E.
    Kratz, Anna L.
    Downing, Nancy R.
    Goodnight, Siera
    Miner, Jennifer A.
    Migliore, Nicholas
    Paulsen, Jane S.
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2015, 24 (08) : 1963 - 1971
  • [4] Validity of the 12-item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) in individuals with Huntington disease (HD)
    Noelle E. Carlozzi
    Anna L. Kratz
    Nancy R. Downing
    Siera Goodnight
    Jennifer A. Miner
    Nicholas Migliore
    Jane S. Paulsen
    Quality of Life Research, 2015, 24 : 1963 - 1971
  • [5] Minimal clinically important difference and minimal detectable change of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) amongst patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain
    Katajapuu, Niina
    Heinonen, Ari
    Saltychev, Mikhail
    CLINICAL REHABILITATION, 2020, 34 (12) : 1506 - 1511
  • [6] Psychometric Properties of the 12-Item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0) in Adult Patients with Motor Disabilities
    Papadopoulou, Marianna
    Stasi, Sophia
    Bakalidou, Daphne
    Papageorgiou, Effie
    Tsokani, Aristi
    Bratsi, Theodora
    Papathanasiou, George
    JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENTAL AND PHYSICAL DISABILITIES, 2020, 32 (05) : 801 - 819
  • [7] Psychometric Properties of the 12-Item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0) in Adult Patients with Motor Disabilities
    Marianna Papadopoulou
    Sophia Stasi
    Daphne Bakalidou
    Effie Papageorgiou
    Aristi Tsokani
    Theodora Bratsi
    George Papathanasiou
    Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 2020, 32 : 801 - 819
  • [8] Agreement of the 12-item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS) 2.0 in parents and youth with physical illness living in Canada
    Ferro, Mark A.
    Basque, Dominique
    Elgie, Melissa
    Dol, Megan
    DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2023, 45 (19) : 3125 - 3134
  • [9] Measurement Properties and Minimal Important Change of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 in Persons With Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review
    Wong, Jessica J.
    DeSouza, Astrid
    Hogg-Johnson, Sheilah
    De Groote, Wouter
    Southerst, Danielle
    Belchos, Melissa
    Lemeunier, Nadege
    Alexopulos, Stephanie
    Varmazyar, Hamid
    Mior, Silvano A.
    Stern, Paula J.
    Nordin, Margareta C.
    Taylor-Vaisey, Anne
    Cieza, Alarcos
    Cote, Pierre
    ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2023, 104 (02): : 287 - 301
  • [10] Validating the 12-item proxy-administered World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS) 2.0 in young children with chronic physical illness in Canada
    Ferro, Mark A.
    Dol, Megan
    Basque, Dominique
    Elgie, Melissa
    DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2023, 45 (19) : 3135 - 3142