The factor structure of cognitive reflection, numeracy, and fluid intelligence: The evidence from the Polish adaptation of the Verbal CRT

被引:6
作者
Sobkow, Agata [1 ]
Olszewska, Angelika [1 ]
Sirota, Miroslav [2 ]
机构
[1] SWPS Univ Social Sci & Humanities, Fac Psychol Wroclaw, Ctr Res Improving Decis Making CRIDM, Ostrowskiego 30b, PL-53238 Wroclaw, Poland
[2] Univ Essex, Colchester, Essex, England
关键词
cognitive reflection; decision making; fluid intelligence; numeracy; rationality; COMPETENCES; PREDICTOR; TESTS;
D O I
10.1002/bdm.2297
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
The Cognitive Reflection Test (CRT) is one of the most popular measures of individual differences in rational thought and decision making. To overcome the issue of overlap with numeracy, a novel measure of cognitive reflection less related to numeracy and math anxiety than Numerical CRT was developed-Verbal CRT. The present research had two main aims: first to investigate the generalizability of Verbal CRT in cultural contexts outside the United States/United Kingdom and second to test the factor structure linking traditional-numerical-CRT, Verbal CRT, numeracy, and fluid intelligence. In Studies 1a and 1b, we adapted and tested the validity and psychometric properties of Polish versions of tasks and scales. Next, using a large and diverse sample of Polish adults, we tested five models of the factor structure of cognitive abilities and thinking dispositions (Study 2). The most parsimonious and best-fitted model contained three latent variables: Verbal CRT, numeracy (composed of the items from the Berlin Numeracy Test and traditional-numerical-CRT), and fluid intelligence. In line with previous research, our results show that Verbal CRT is a valid cognitive reflection measure that provides a clearer interpretation than traditional CRT, even in a different language and cultural context.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 57 条
[1]  
Attali Y, 2020, JUDGM DECIS MAK, V15, P93
[2]   Determinants of judgment and decision making quality: the interplay between information processing style and situational factors [J].
Ayal, Shahar ;
Rusou, Zohar ;
Zakay, Dan ;
Hochman, Guy .
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2015, 6
[3]   The Smart System 1: evidence for the intuitive nature of correct responding on the bat-and-ball problem [J].
Bago, Bence ;
De Neys, Wim .
THINKING & REASONING, 2019, 25 (03) :257-299
[4]   Cognitive Reflection But Not Reinforcement Sensitivity Is Consistently Associated With Delay Discounting of Gains and Losses [J].
Bialek, Michal ;
Bergelt, Max ;
Majima, Yoshimasa ;
Koehler, Derek J. .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE PSYCHOLOGY AND ECONOMICS, 2019, 12 (3-4) :169-183
[5]   Cognitive Reflection Effects on Time Discounting [J].
Bialek, Michal ;
Sawicki, Przemyslaw .
JOURNAL OF INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2018, 39 (02) :99-106
[6]   Cognitive reflection test: Whom, how, when [J].
Branas-Garza, Pablo ;
Kujal, Praveen ;
Lenkei, Balint .
JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL AND EXPERIMENTAL ECONOMICS, 2019, 82
[7]  
Brown TA, 2015, Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research, V2nd
[8]   How scientific reasoning correlates with health-related beliefs and behaviors during the COVID-19 pandemic? [J].
Cavojova, Vladimira ;
Srol, Jakub ;
Ballova Mikuskova, Eva .
JOURNAL OF HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY, 2022, 27 (03) :534-547
[9]  
Cipora K., 2017, Journal of Numerical Cognition, V3, P667, DOI DOI 10.5964/JNC.V3I3.121
[10]  
Cokely E.T., 2018, CAMBRIDGE HDB EXPERT, P476, DOI [10.1017/9781316480748.026, DOI 10.1017/9781316480748.026]