Who wants COVID-19 vaccination to be compulsory? The impact of party cues, left-right ideology, and populism

被引:18
作者
Juen, Christina-Marie [1 ]
Jankowski, Michael [2 ]
Huber, Robert A. [3 ]
Frank, Torren [1 ]
Maass, Leena [1 ]
Tepe, Markus [1 ]
机构
[1] Carl von Ossietzky Univ Oldenburg, Ammerlander Heerstr 114-118, D-26129 Oldenburg, Germany
[2] Univ Bremen, Bremen, Germany
[3] Univ Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria
关键词
compulsory vaccination; COVID-19; pandemic; cueing experiment; populist attitudes; SARS-CoV-2; INFORMATION; ATTITUDES;
D O I
10.1177/02633957211061999
中图分类号
D81 [国际关系];
学科分类号
030207 ;
摘要
Vaccine hesitancy is one of the major obstacles for successfully combating the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. To achieve a sufficiently high vaccination rate, calls for compulsory vaccinations have been discussed controversially. This study analyses what drives citizens' attitudes towards compulsory vaccination during the COVID-19 pandemic. Specifically, we are interested in the impact of party- and expert cues on public attitudes. We further expect populist attitudes to be an important indicator of the rejection of compulsory vaccination due to their scepticism towards science. To test these expectations, we rely on a cueing experiment conducted on a sample of 2265 German citizens. We test for the effects of in-party and out-party cues as well as public health expert cues. We find evidence for in-party cues, meaning that respondents adjust their position on this issue in the direction of their most preferred party. Similar results can be found for public health expert cues. However, there is no evidence for out-party cues. Further analyses reveal that support for compulsory vaccinations is not affected by left-right placement directly. Instead, only the combination of right-wing attitudes and populism negatively affects support for compulsory vaccination.
引用
收藏
页码:330 / 350
页数:21
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]  
Achen ChristopherH., 2016, DEMOCRACY REALISTS W
[2]   How Populist Are the People? Measuring Populist Attitudes in Voters [J].
Akkerman, Agnes ;
Mudde, Cas ;
Zaslove, Andrej .
COMPARATIVE POLITICAL STUDIES, 2014, 47 (09) :1324-1353
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2014, The selection and use of essential medicines : report of the WHO Expert Committee, 2013 (including the 18th WHO model list of essential medicines and the 4th WHO model list of essential medicines for 174 children), P1, DOI DOI 10.3109/09540261.2014.928270
[4]   Understanding Partisan Cue Receptivity: Tests of Predictions from the Bounded Rationality and Expressive Utility Perspectives [J].
Bakker, Bert N. ;
Lelkes, Yphtach ;
Malka, Ariel .
JOURNAL OF POLITICS, 2020, 82 (03) :1061-1077
[5]   Risk of disease and willingness to vaccinate in the United States: A population-based survey [J].
Baumgaertner, Bert ;
Ridenhour, Benjamin J. ;
Justwan, Florian ;
Carlisle, Juliet E. ;
Miller, Craig R. .
PLOS MEDICINE, 2020, 17 (10)
[6]   The influence of political ideology and trust on willingness to vaccinate [J].
Baumgaertner, Bert ;
Carlisle, Juliet E. ;
Justwan, Florian .
PLOS ONE, 2018, 13 (01)
[7]   Reality Bites: The Limits of Framing Effects for Salient and Contested Policy Issues [J].
Bechtel, Michael M. ;
Hainmueller, Jens ;
Hangartner, Dominik ;
Helbling, Marc .
POLITICAL SCIENCE RESEARCH AND METHODS, 2015, 3 (03) :683-695
[8]   Detrimental effects of introducing partial compulsory vaccination: experimental evidence [J].
Betsch, Cornelia ;
Boehm, Robert .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2016, 26 (03) :378-381
[9]   Understanding interaction models: Improving empirical analyses [J].
Brambor, T ;
Clark, WR ;
Golder, M .
POLITICAL ANALYSIS, 2006, 14 (01) :63-82
[10]  
Callaghan T, 2020, SSRN Electronic Journal, DOI [10.2139/ssrn.3667971, 10.2139/ssrn.3667971, DOI 10.2139/SSRN.3667971]