What is the success rate of trial of labor in monochorionic diamniotic twins? A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies

被引:2
作者
Xodo, Serena [1 ]
Orsaria, Maria [2 ]
Londero, Ambrogio P. [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Sch Med Udine, Dept Gynecol & Obstet, Udine, Italy
[2] Sch Med Udine, Inst Pathol, Udine, Italy
[3] Univ Genoa, Acad Unit Obstet & Gynaecol, Genoa, Italy
[4] Univ Genoa, Dept Neurosci Rehabil Ophthalmol Genet Maternal &, Genoa, Italy
关键词
delivery mode; intrapartum twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome; monochorionic diamniotic pregnancy; trial of labor; twin pregnancy; RETROSPECTIVE-COHORT; TRANSFUSION SYNDROME; VAGINAL DELIVERY; MODE; PREGNANCIES; BIRTH; RISK; DISORDERS; MORTALITY; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1016/j.ajogmf.2022.100767
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the success rate of trial of labor in monochorionic diamniotic pregnancies and the impact of delivery mode on neonatal outcomes. DATA SOURCES: Searches were performed in MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform from the inception of each database until April 2022. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Selection criteria included observational studies analyzing the delivery mode among monochorionic diamniotic gestations. METHODS: All analyses were carried out using an intention-to-treat approach, evaluating women according to the delivery mode to which they were assigned in the original studies. RESULTS: Seventeen studies met the eligibility criteria and were suitable for qualitative and quantitative analysis. In total, 4116 women were analyzed. This meta-analysis showed that trial of labor in monochorionic diamniotic pregnancies resulted in vaginal delivery of both twins in 75.5% of cases (95% confidence interval, 69.1-80.9). Failure to deliver the second twin vaginally occurred in 3.8% of cases (95% confidence interval, 2.5-5.7). In addition, the neonatal outcomes were comparable among women with monochorionic diamniotic pregnancy undergoing different planned delivery modes. Neonatal death occurred in 3.7 per 1000 cases in the planned cesarean delivery group and in 1.6 per 1000 cases in the planned vaginal delivery group. Perinatal death was observed in 7.5 per 1000 cases in the planned cesarean delivery group and in 5.8 per 1000 cases in the planned vaginal delivery group. Umbilical artery pH <7.00 occurred in 0 per 1000 cases in the planned cesarean delivery and 4.6 per 1000 cases in the planned vaginal delivery group. Neonatal intensive care unit stay of >72 hours had a prevalence of 59.7 per 1000 cases in the planned cesarean delivery and 42.8 per 1000 cases in the planned vaginal delivery group. CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis showed that trial of labor in monochorionic diamniotic pregnancies is successful in most cases and relatively safe, considering that neonatal and perinatal mortality and severe morbidity were comparable between the trial of labor and planned cesarean delivery groups. Therefore, the choice of planned delivery mode in twin gestations should not be made a priori.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 36 条
[21]   Perinatal outcome of dichorionic and monochorionic-diamniotic Finnish twins: a historical cohort study [J].
Rissanen, Annu-Riikka S. ;
Gissler, Mika ;
Nupponen, Irmeli K. ;
Nuutila, Mika E. ;
Jernman, Riina M. .
ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2022, 101 (01) :153-162
[22]   Association of Prelabor Cesarean Delivery With Reduced Mortality in Twins Born Near Term [J].
Roberts, Christine L. ;
Algert, Charles S. ;
Nippita, Tanya A. ;
Bowen, Jennifer R. ;
Shand, Antonia W. .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2015, 125 (01) :103-110
[23]   Vaginal delivery can be considered in monochorionic diamniotic twins [J].
Sau, A ;
Chalmers, S ;
Shennan, AH ;
Fox, G ;
Maxwell, D .
BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2006, 113 (05) :602-604
[24]   Perinatal outcome after planned vaginal delivery in monochorionic compared with dichorionic twin pregnancy [J].
Schmitz, T. ;
Korb, D. ;
Azria, E. ;
Garabedian, C. ;
Rozenberg, P. ;
Senat, M., V ;
Sentilhes, L. ;
Vayssiere, C. ;
Winer, N. ;
Goffinet, F. .
ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2021, 57 (04) :592-599
[25]   Seriously misleading results using inverse of Freeman-Tukey double arcsine transformation in meta-analysis of single proportions [J].
Schwarzer, Guido ;
Chemaitelly, Hiam ;
Abu-Raddad, Laith J. ;
Ruecker, Gerta .
RESEARCH SYNTHESIS METHODS, 2019, 10 (03) :476-483
[26]   Acute twin-twin transfusion syndrome in labor: pathophysiology and associated factors [J].
Skupski, Daniel W. ;
Sylvestre, George ;
Di Renzo, Gian Carlo ;
Grunebaum, Amos .
JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2012, 25 (05) :456-460
[27]   Mode of delivery and the risk of delivery-related perinatal death among twins at term: a retrospective cohort study of 8073 births [J].
Smith, GCS ;
Shah, I ;
White, IR ;
Pell, JP ;
Dobbie, R .
BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2005, 112 (08) :1139-1144
[28]   Birth order of twins and risk of perinatal death related to delivery in England, Northern Ireland, and Wales, 1994-2003: retrospective cohort study [J].
Smith, Gordon C. S. ;
Fleming, Kate M. ;
White, Ian R. .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2007, 334 (7593) :576-578A
[29]   ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions [J].
Sterne, Jonathan A. C. ;
Hernan, Miguel A. ;
Reeves, Barnaby C. ;
Savovic, Jelena ;
Berkman, Nancy D. ;
Viswanathan, Meera ;
Henry, David ;
Altman, Douglas G. ;
Ansari, Mohammed T. ;
Boutron, Isabelle ;
Carpenter, James R. ;
Chan, An-Wen ;
Churchill, Rachel ;
Deeks, Jonathan J. ;
Hrobjartsson, Asbjorn ;
Kirkham, Jamie ;
Juni, Peter ;
Loke, Yoon K. ;
Pigott, Theresa D. ;
Ramsay, Craig R. ;
Regidor, Deborah ;
Rothstein, Hannah R. ;
Sandhu, Lakhbir ;
Santaguida, Pasqualina L. ;
Schunemann, Holger J. ;
Shea, Beverly ;
Shrier, Ian ;
Tugwell, Peter ;
Turner, Lucy ;
Valentine, Jeffrey C. ;
Waddington, Hugh ;
Waters, Elizabeth ;
Wells, George A. ;
Whiting, Penny F. ;
Higgins, Julian P. T. .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2016, 355
[30]   Recommendations for examining and interpreting funnel plot asymmetry in meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials [J].
Sterne, Jonathan A. C. ;
Sutton, Alex J. ;
Ioannidis, John P. A. ;
Terrin, Norma ;
Jones, David R. ;
Lau, Joseph ;
Carpenter, James ;
Ruecker, Gerta ;
Harbord, Roger M. ;
Schmid, Christopher H. ;
Tetzlaff, Jennifer ;
Deeks, Jonathan J. ;
Peters, Jaime ;
Macaskill, Petra ;
Schwarzer, Guido ;
Duval, Sue ;
Altman, Douglas G. ;
Moher, David ;
Higgins, Julian P. T. .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2011, 343