What is the success rate of trial of labor in monochorionic diamniotic twins? A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies

被引:1
作者
Xodo, Serena [1 ]
Orsaria, Maria [2 ]
Londero, Ambrogio P. [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Sch Med Udine, Dept Gynecol & Obstet, Udine, Italy
[2] Sch Med Udine, Inst Pathol, Udine, Italy
[3] Univ Genoa, Acad Unit Obstet & Gynaecol, Genoa, Italy
[4] Univ Genoa, Dept Neurosci Rehabil Ophthalmol Genet Maternal &, Genoa, Italy
关键词
delivery mode; intrapartum twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome; monochorionic diamniotic pregnancy; trial of labor; twin pregnancy; RETROSPECTIVE-COHORT; TRANSFUSION SYNDROME; VAGINAL DELIVERY; MODE; PREGNANCIES; BIRTH; RISK; DISORDERS; MORTALITY; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1016/j.ajogmf.2022.100767
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the success rate of trial of labor in monochorionic diamniotic pregnancies and the impact of delivery mode on neonatal outcomes. DATA SOURCES: Searches were performed in MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform from the inception of each database until April 2022. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Selection criteria included observational studies analyzing the delivery mode among monochorionic diamniotic gestations. METHODS: All analyses were carried out using an intention-to-treat approach, evaluating women according to the delivery mode to which they were assigned in the original studies. RESULTS: Seventeen studies met the eligibility criteria and were suitable for qualitative and quantitative analysis. In total, 4116 women were analyzed. This meta-analysis showed that trial of labor in monochorionic diamniotic pregnancies resulted in vaginal delivery of both twins in 75.5% of cases (95% confidence interval, 69.1-80.9). Failure to deliver the second twin vaginally occurred in 3.8% of cases (95% confidence interval, 2.5-5.7). In addition, the neonatal outcomes were comparable among women with monochorionic diamniotic pregnancy undergoing different planned delivery modes. Neonatal death occurred in 3.7 per 1000 cases in the planned cesarean delivery group and in 1.6 per 1000 cases in the planned vaginal delivery group. Perinatal death was observed in 7.5 per 1000 cases in the planned cesarean delivery group and in 5.8 per 1000 cases in the planned vaginal delivery group. Umbilical artery pH <7.00 occurred in 0 per 1000 cases in the planned cesarean delivery and 4.6 per 1000 cases in the planned vaginal delivery group. Neonatal intensive care unit stay of >72 hours had a prevalence of 59.7 per 1000 cases in the planned cesarean delivery and 42.8 per 1000 cases in the planned vaginal delivery group. CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis showed that trial of labor in monochorionic diamniotic pregnancies is successful in most cases and relatively safe, considering that neonatal and perinatal mortality and severe morbidity were comparable between the trial of labor and planned cesarean delivery groups. Therefore, the choice of planned delivery mode in twin gestations should not be made a priori.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 36 条
  • [1] Delivery of monochorionic twins: lessons learned from the Twin Birth Study
    Aviram, Amir
    Lipworth, Hayley
    Asztalos, Elizabeth, V
    Mei-Dan, Elad
    Melamed, Nir
    Cao, Xingshan
    Zaltz, Arthur
    Hvidman, Lone
    Barrett, Jon F. R.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2020, 223 (06)
  • [2] A Randomized Trial of Planned Cesarean or Vaginal Delivery for Twin Pregnancy
    Barrett, Jon F. R.
    Hannah, Mary E.
    Hutton, Eileen K.
    Willan, Andrew R.
    Allen, Alexander C.
    Armson, B. Anthony
    Gafni, Amiram
    Joseph, K. S.
    Mason, Dalah
    Ohlsson, Arne
    Ross, Susan
    Sanchez, J. Johanna
    Asztalos, Elizabeth V.
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2013, 369 (14) : 1295 - 1305
  • [3] Borenstein M, 2009, INTRO MET ANAL
  • [4] A basic introduction to fixed-effect and random-effects models for meta-analysis
    Borenstein, Michael
    Hedges, Larry V.
    Higgins, Julian P. T.
    Rothstein, Hannah R.
    [J]. RESEARCH SYNTHESIS METHODS, 2010, 1 (02) : 97 - 111
  • [5] Optimum Timing for Planned Delivery of Uncomplicated Monochorionic and Dichorionic Twin Pregnancies
    Breathnach, Fionnuala M.
    McAuliffe, Fionnuala M.
    Geary, Michael
    Daly, Sean
    Higgins, John R.
    Dornan, James
    Morrison, John J.
    Burke, Gerard
    Higgins, Shane
    Dicker, Patrick
    Manning, Fiona
    Carroll, Stephen
    Malone, Fergal D.
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2012, 119 (01) : 50 - 59
  • [6] Mode of delivery, perinatal outcome and neurodevelopment in uncomplicated monochorionic diamniotic twins: a single-center retrospective cohort study
    Chimenea, Angel
    Garcia-Diaz, Lutgardo
    Antinolo, Guillermo
    [J]. BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH, 2022, 22 (01)
  • [7] Delivery of Twin Gestation (≥ 32.0 Weeks): The Vaginal Route as a Practicable and Safe Alternative to Cesarean Section
    Dathan-Stumpf, Anne
    Winkel, Katharina
    Stepan, Holger
    [J]. GEBURTSHILFE UND FRAUENHEILKUNDE, 2020, 80 (10) : 1033 - 1040
  • [8] Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test
    Egger, M
    Smith, GD
    Schneider, M
    Minder, C
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1997, 315 (7109): : 629 - 634
  • [9] Intrapartum management of twin pregnancies: are uncomplicated monochorionic pregnancies more at risk of complications than dichorionic pregnancies?
    Garabedian, Charles
    Poulain, Chloe
    Duhamel, Alain
    Subtil, Damien
    Houfflin-Debarge, Veronique
    Deruelle, Philippe
    [J]. ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2015, 94 (03) : 301 - 307
  • [10] Perinatal mortality and mode of delivery in monochorionic diamniotic twin pregnancies ≥32 weeks of gestation: a multicentre retrospective cohort study
    Hack, K. E. A.
    Derks, J. B.
    Elias, S. G.
    van Mameren, F. A.
    Koopman-Esseboom, C.
    Mol, B. W. J.
    Lopriore, E.
    Schaap, A. H. P.
    Arabin, B.
    Duvekot, J. J.
    Go, A. T. J. I.
    Wieselmann, E.
    Eggink, A. J.
    Willekes, C.
    Vandenbussche, F. P. H. A.
    Visser, G. H. A.
    [J]. BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2011, 118 (09) : 1090 - 1097