Resilience for Goal-Based Agents: Formalism, Metrics, and Case Studies

被引:2
作者
Leaf, Jennifer [1 ]
Adams, Julie A. [1 ]
Scheutz, Matthias [2 ]
Goodrich, Michael A. [3 ]
机构
[1] Oregon State Univ, Collaboat Robot & Intelligent Syst Inst, Corvallis, OR 97331 USA
[2] Tufts Univ, Dept Comp Sci, Medford, MA 02115 USA
[3] Brigham Young Univ, Dept Comp Sci, Provo, UT 84602 USA
关键词
Resilience; Measurement; Perturbation methods; Behavioral sciences; Trajectory; Maintenance engineering; Biological system modeling; Robots; perturbations; single goal; agents; robots; STABILITY; FRAMEWORK;
D O I
10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3326755
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Goal-based agents need to be resilient to perturbations in the world. Existing resilience definitions emphasize maintenance-type goals and, consequently, describe how well systems can recover and return to a desirable operating state after a perturbation. An alternative formulation of resilience is required for achievement-type goals that emphasize the ability to progress towards a goal state. This manuscript proposes a new formalism of resilience as a computational construct that accounts for an agent's sensors, effectors, communication channels, and computational resources. Two metrics for comparing the resilience of different algorithms are derived, namely power and efficiency. Three case studies demonstrate how the metrics can be used to characterize power-efficiency tradeoffs in algorithm design. A common property of the resilient algorithms in the case studies is that they have the ability to exploit many possible world trajectories, often at the cost of failing to find optimal trajectories in unperturbed conditions.
引用
收藏
页码:121999 / 122015
页数:17
相关论文
共 60 条
[1]  
Albertos P, 2010, FEEDBACK AND CONTROL FOR EVERYONE, P1, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-03446-6
[2]   Quantifying resilience [J].
Angeler, David G. ;
Allen, Craig R. .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY, 2016, 53 (03) :617-624
[3]   A quantitative framework for assessing ecological resilience [J].
Baho, Didier L. ;
Allen, Craig R. ;
Garmestani, Ahjond ;
Fried-Petersen, Hannah ;
Renes, Sophia E. ;
Gunderson, Lance ;
Angeler, David G. .
ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY, 2017, 22 (03)
[4]   Network approach for resilience evaluation of a UAV swarm by considering communication limits [J].
Bai, Guanghan ;
Li, Yanjun ;
Fang, Yining ;
Zhang, Yun-An ;
Tao, Junyong .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2020, 193
[5]   A review of swarm robotics tasks [J].
Bayindir, Levent .
NEUROCOMPUTING, 2016, 172 :292-321
[6]   From Resistance to Transformation: A Generic Metric of Resilience Through Viability [J].
Bene, Christophe ;
Doyen, Luc .
EARTHS FUTURE, 2018, 6 (07) :979-996
[7]   Resilience: the concept, a literature review and future directions [J].
Bhamra, Ran ;
Dani, Samir ;
Burnard, Kevin .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH, 2011, 49 (18) :5375-5393
[8]  
Brand FS, 2007, ECOL SOC, V12
[9]   A framework to quantitatively assess and enhance the seismic resilience of communities [J].
Bruneau, M ;
Chang, SE ;
Eguchi, RT ;
Lee, GC ;
O'Rourke, TD ;
Reinhorn, AM ;
Shinozuka, M ;
Tierney, K ;
Wallace, WA ;
von Winterfeldt, D .
EARTHQUAKE SPECTRA, 2003, 19 (04) :733-752
[10]  
Cao X., 2022, P 2022 IEEE INT C SY, P71, DOI [10.1109/SMC53654.2022.9945133, DOI 10.1109/SMC53654.2022.9945133]