Pluralization Challenges to Religion as a Social Imaginary: Anti-Caste Contestations of the Muslim Quota in India

被引:1
作者
Ansari, Khalid Anis [1 ]
Suransky, Caroline [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Azim Premji Univ, Sch Arts & Sci, Bangalore 562125, Karnataka, India
[2] Univ Humanist Studies, Dept Educ, NL-3512 HD Utrecht, Netherlands
[3] Stellenbosch Univ, Dept Educ Policy Studies, ZA-7602 Stellenbosch, Matieland, South Africa
关键词
pluralization; social imaginary; social justice; Pasmanda; quota; caste and Islam; majority-minority; AFFIRMATIVE-ACTION;
D O I
10.3390/rel14060742
中图分类号
B9 [宗教];
学科分类号
010107 ;
摘要
Postcolonial democratic deepening brings new challenges to religion as a social imaginary in India. Increasing cultural differentiation and pluralization are countered by fundamentalization, but also challenge existing minority/multicultural imaginations. Religion, as the overarching identity category, has come under scrutiny given the politicization of caste among Muslims, who form the country's most significant religious minority. Through social-justice and anti-caste politics in the 1990s, lowered-caste Muslims started to enact a new identity named Pasmanda, which means "those who have been left behind". The Pasmanda discourse emphasizes internal heterogeneities and hegemonies and pluralizes the "Muslim". It thus ruptures the imaginary of Muslims as a homogeneous minority in a culturally diverse country and problematizes the majority-minority framework. An important site of contestation is the reservation (quota) policy in public employment, education, and the legislature. While privileged-caste Muslims generally prefer a quota based on religion, the lowered-caste Pasmanda Muslims increasingly mobilize for a caste-based quota, thus challenging systems of recognition and redistribution.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 75 条
  • [1] Ahmad Imtiaz., 2017, CONT PERSPECTIVES, V1, P89, DOI [10.1177/223080750700100204, DOI 10.1177/223080750700100204]
  • [2] Affirmative Action for Muslims? Arguments, Contentions and Alternatives
    Alam, Mohd. Sanjeer
    [J]. STUDIES IN INDIAN POLITICS, 2014, 2 (02) : 215 - 229
  • [3] Alam T., 2019, Social Change, V49, P78, DOI [https://doi.org/10.1177/0049085718821517, DOI 10.1177/0049085718821517]
  • [4] Anand R., 2005, CIVIL SOC, P10
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2006, SOCIAL EC ED STATUS
  • [6] [Anonymous], 1995, RIGHTS MINORITY CULT
  • [7] [Anonymous], 1980, MAND COMM REP BACKW
  • [8] [Anonymous], 2007, GOI REP NAT COMM REL, V1
  • [9] [Anonymous], 2009, DRAKE LAW R
  • [10] Ansari Ghaus., 1960, MUSLIM CASTE UTTAR P