The potential use of mass timber in mid-to high-rise construction and the associated carbon benefits in the United States

被引:11
作者
Nepal, Prakash [1 ]
Prestemon, Jeffrey P. [2 ]
Ganguly, Indroneil [3 ]
Kumar, Vaibhav [1 ,4 ]
Bergman, Richard D. [1 ]
Poudyal, Neelam C. [4 ]
机构
[1] US Forest Serv, USDA, Forest Prod Lab, Madison, WI 53726 USA
[2] US Forest Serv, USDA, Southern Res Stn, Res Triangle Pk, NC USA
[3] Univ Washington, Coll Environm, Seattle, WA USA
[4] Univ Tennessee, Sch Nat Resources, Knoxville, TN USA
关键词
CROSS-LAMINATED TIMBER; NONRESIDENTIAL-CONSTRUCTION; WOOD; SUBSTITUTION; PRODUCTS; ADOPTION; IMPACTS;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0298379
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Nonresidential and mid- to high-rise multifamily residential structures in the United States currently use little wood per unit floor area installed, because earlier building codes lacked provisions for structural wood use in those types of buildings. However, revisions to the International Building Code allow for increased wood use in the form of mass timber, as structural and fire safety concerns have been addressed through new science-based design standards and through newly specified construction materials and measures. This study used multiple models to describe alternative futures for new construction, mass timber adoption rates, and the associated carbon benefits in higher than three-story buildings in the United States. The use of mass timber, in place of traditional constructions (i.e., structures dominated by concrete and steel), in projected new higher than three-story buildings was shown to provide combined carbon benefits (i.e., global warming mitigation benefits), including avoided embodied carbon emissions due to the substitution of non-wood alternatives and additional biogenic carbon storage in mass timber materials, of between 9.9 and 16.5 million t CO2e/yr spanning 50 years, 2020 to 2070. These carbon benefits equate to 12% to 20% of the total U.S. harvested wood products carbon storage for 2020. Future research is needed to understand how greater mass timber adoption leads to changes in forest product markets, land use, and total forest sector carbon.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 66 条
[1]   A Review of the Performance and Benefits of Mass Timber as an Alternative to Concrete and Steel for Improving the Sustainability of Structures [J].
Abed, Joseph ;
Rayburg, Scott ;
Rodwell, John ;
Neave, Melissa .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (09)
[2]   Comparative Cradle-to-Grave Life Cycle Assessment of Low and Mid-Rise Mass Timber Buildings with Equivalent Structural Steel Alternatives [J].
Allan, Kevin ;
Phillips, Adam R. .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (06)
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2022, New Residential Construction
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2018, Mass Timber Market Analysis
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2022, Inventory of US Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sinks: 1990-2020
[6]  
Atkins D., 2023, International Mass Timber Report: 2023
[7]   NEW PRODUCT GROWTH FOR MODEL CONSUMER DURABLES [J].
BASS, FM .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE SERIES A-THEORY, 1969, 15 (05) :215-227
[8]  
Bergman RD, 2013, USDA Forest Service Res. Pap. FPL-RP-672
[9]   Techno-Economic Analysis for Manufacturing Cross-Laminated Timber [J].
Brandt, Kristin ;
Wilson, Alex ;
Bender, Donald ;
Dolan, James D. ;
Wolcott, Michael P. .
BIORESOURCES, 2019, 14 (04) :7790-7804
[10]  
Breneman S., 2019, Woodworks