Simultaneous population enrichment and endpoint selection in phase 3 randomized controlled trials: An adaptive group sequential design with two binary alternative primary endpoints

被引:0
作者
Sinha, Arup K. [1 ]
Moye III, Lemuel [1 ]
Piller, Linda B. [2 ]
Yamal, Jose-Miguel [1 ]
Barcenas, Carlos H. [3 ]
Song, Jaejoon [4 ]
Davis, Barry R. [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Houston, Dept Biostat, Sch Publ Hlth, Houston, TX USA
[2] Univ Texas Houston, Div Epidemiol Human Genet & Environm Sci, Sch Publ Hlth, Houston, TX USA
[3] MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Breast Med Oncol, Div Canc Med, Houston, TX USA
[4] MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Biostat, Houston, TX USA
[5] Univ Texas Houston, Dept Biostat, Sch Publ Hlth, Houston, TX 77030 USA
关键词
Phase; 3; adaptive; enrichment; alternative endpoints; CLINICAL-TRIALS; THRESHOLD;
D O I
10.1080/03610926.2022.2163180
中图分类号
O21 [概率论与数理统计]; C8 [统计学];
学科分类号
020208 ; 070103 ; 0714 ;
摘要
Population enrichment designs can play a vital role in detecting treatment benefits, if present, by selecting a study population where the treatment is more likely to show a benefit compared to the unselected population. While population enrichment designs with one primary endpoint have been studied in the current literature, there are limited research on population enrichment with alternative primary endpoints. Many diseases have multiple sequelae and it can be sufficient to show treatment benefits on at least one of these consequences. In this manuscript, we provide the theoretical basis and development of a two-stage adaptive design with two binary alternative primary endpoints that simultaneously evaluates two subgroups for enrichment, selects one or both endpoints for efficacy assessments at the time of the interim analysis using pre-specified decision rules, and maintains an overall type I error rate. Treatment benefits can be declared in one or both endpoints in a selected subgroup or in the overall population at the time of interim or final analyses. We provide stage-wise boundary values for futility and efficacy and rejection probabilities under heterogeneous treatment effects in the subgroups. We further demonstrate the implementation of the proposed design and discuss venues for future development on this topic.
引用
收藏
页码:3728 / 3741
页数:14
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2022, R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2019, Enrichment strategies for clinical trials to support determination of effectiveness of human drugs and biological products. Guidance for Industry
[3]   Interim evaluation of efficacy or futility in group-sequential trials with multiple co-primary endpoints [J].
Asakura, Koko ;
Hamasaki, Toshimitsu ;
Evans, Scott R. .
BIOMETRICAL JOURNAL, 2017, 59 (04) :703-731
[4]   Primary end points in phase III clinical trials of severe head trauma: DRS versus GOS [J].
Choi, SC ;
Marmarou, A ;
Bullock, R ;
Nichols, JS ;
Wei, X ;
Pitts, LH .
JOURNAL OF NEUROTRAUMA, 1998, 15 (10) :771-776
[5]   Coupled error spending functions for parallel bivariate sequential tests [J].
Cook, RJ .
BIOMETRICS, 1996, 52 (02) :442-450
[6]  
COOK T.D., 2007, INTRO STAT METHODS C
[7]   Innovation in the pharmaceutical industry: New estimates of R&D costs [J].
DiMasi, Joseph A. ;
Grabowski, Henry G. ;
Hansen, Ronald W. .
JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2016, 47 :20-33
[8]  
Federal Interagency Traumatic Brain Injury Research, 2019, EPO SEV TBI TRIAL
[9]   Effect of Tarenflurbil on Cognitive Decline and Activities of Daily Living in Patients With Mild Alzheimer Disease A Randomized Controlled Trial [J].
Green, Robert C. ;
Schneider, Lon S. ;
Amato, David A. ;
Beelen, Andrew P. ;
Wilcock, Gordon ;
Swabb, Edward A. ;
Zavitz, Kenton H. .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2009, 302 (23) :2557-2564
[10]  
Grignolo A., 2016, Applied Clinical Trials, V25, P36