Weekly updating of guideline recommendations was feasible: the Australian National COVID-19 clinical evidence Taskforce

被引:7
作者
Hewitt, Jessie [1 ]
McDonald, Steve [1 ]
Poole, Alex [1 ,2 ]
White, Heath [1 ]
Turner, Simon [3 ]
Turner, Tari [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Monash Univ, Sch Publ Hlth & Prevent Med, 553 St Kilda Rd, Melbourne, Vic 3004, Australia
[2] Univ Adelaide, Discipline Acute Care Med, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia
[3] Monash Univ, Sch Publ Hlth & Prevent Med, Biostat Unit, 553 St Kilda Rd, Melbourne, Vic 3004, Australia
[4] Monash Univ, Sch Publ Hlth & Prevent Med, 533 St Kilda Rd, Melbourne, Vic 3004, Australia
关键词
COVID-19; Living evidence; Living guidelines; Synthesis; Pandemic; Guideline development; LIVING GUIDELINES;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclinepi.2023.02.019
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objectives: To investigate how quickly evidence was incorporated into the Australian living guidelines for COVID-19 during the first 12 months of the pandemic.Study Design and Setting: For each study concerning drug therapies included in the guideline from April 3, 2020 to April 1, 2021, we extracted the publication date of the study, and the guideline version the study was included in. We analyzed two subgroups of studies as follows: those published in high impact factor journals and those with 100 or more participants.Results: In the first year, we published 37 major versions of the guidelines, incorporating 129 studies that investigated 48 drug therapies informing 115 recommendations. The median time from first publication of a study to incorporation in the guideline was 27 days (inter-quartile range [IQR], 16 to 44), ranging from 9 to 234 days. For the 53 studies in the highest impact factor journals, the median was 20 days (IQR 15 to 30), and for the 71 studies with 100 or more participants the median was 22 days (IQR 15 to 36).Conclusion: Developing and sustaining living guidelines where evidence is rapidly incorporated is a resource-and time-intensive un-dertaking; however, this study demonstrates that it is feasible, even over a long period.(c) 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页码:131 / 136
页数:6
相关论文
共 23 条
  • [1] Living systematic reviews: 4. Living guideline recommendations
    Akl, Elie A.
    Meerpohl, Joerg J.
    Elliott, Julian
    Kahale, Lara A.
    Schuenemann, Holger J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2017, 91 : 47 - 53
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2020, WHO COVID 19 DASHBOA
  • [3] Chen QY, 2020, NATURE, V579, P193, DOI 10.1038/d41586-020-00694-1
  • [4] Cheyne S, 2023, J CLIN EPIDEMIOL
  • [5] Methods for living guidelines: early guidance based on practical experience. Paper 1: Introduction
    Cheyne, Saskia
    Navarro, David Fraile
    Hill, Kelvin
    McDonald, Steve
    Tunnicliffe, David
    White, Heath
    Whittle, Samuel
    Karpusheff, Justine
    Mustafa, Reem
    Morgan, Rebecca L.
    Sultan, Shahnaz
    Turner, Tari
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2023, 155 : 84 - 96
  • [6] Living systematic review: 1. Introduction-the why, what, when, and how
    Elliott, Julian H.
    Synnot, Anneliese
    Turner, Tan
    Simmonds, Mark
    Akl, Elie A.
    McDonald, Steve
    Salanti, Georgia
    Meerpohl, Joerg
    MacLehose, Harriet
    Hilton, John
    Tovey, David
    Shemilt, Ian
    Thomas, James
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2017, 91 : 23 - 30
  • [7] Else H, 2020, NATURE, V588, P553, DOI 10.1038/d41586-020-03564-y
  • [8] The evolving role of preprints in the dissemination of COVID-19 research and their impact on the science communication landscape
    Fraser, Nicholas
    Brierley, Liam
    Dey, Gautam
    Polka, Jessica K.
    Palfy, Mate
    Nanni, Federico
    Coates, Jonathon Alexis
    [J]. PLOS BIOLOGY, 2021, 19 (04)
  • [9] Characteristics of academic publications, preprints, and registered clinical trials on the COVID-19 pandemic
    Gianola, Silvia
    Jesus, Tiago S.
    Bargeri, Silvia
    Castellini, Greta
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2020, 15 (10):
  • [10] GRADE:: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations
    Guyatt, Gordon H.
    Oxman, Andrew D.
    Vist, Gunn E.
    Kunz, Regina
    Falck-Ytter, Yngve
    Alonso-Coello, Pablo
    Schuenemann, Holger J.
    [J]. BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2008, 336 (7650): : 924 - 926