Forbush Decreases and Associated Geomagnetic Storms: Statistical Comparison in Solar Cycles 23 and 24

被引:3
作者
Melkumyan, A. A. [1 ]
Belov, A. V. [1 ]
Shlyk, N. S. [1 ]
Abunina, M. A. [1 ]
Abunin, A. A. [1 ]
Oleneva, V. A. [1 ]
Yanke, V. G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Russian Acad Sci, Pushkov Inst Terr Magnetism Ionosphere & Radio Wav, IZMIRAN, Kaluzhskoe Hwy 4, Troitsk 108840, Moscow, Russia
关键词
CORONAL MASS EJECTIONS; MAGNETIC CLOUDS; INTERPLANETARY; GEOEFFECTIVENESS; PARAMETERS; MAGNITUDE; CATALOG;
D O I
10.1007/s11207-024-02281-3
中图分类号
P1 [天文学];
学科分类号
0704 ;
摘要
Statistical relations between the geomagnetic Dst index, cosmic ray variations, and solar wind characteristics are compared for Forbush decreases associated with: (i) coronal mass ejections from active regions (AR-CMEs) accompanied by solar flares, (ii) filament eruptions outside active regions, (iii) corotating interaction regions (CIRs) caused by high-speed streams from coronal holes, (iv) mixed events induced by two or more solar sources. Relationships of geomagnetic indices and parameters of cosmic rays and the solar wind are also compared between sporadic events with or without magnetic clouds (MCs) and between Solar Cycles (SCs) 23 and 24. The results reveal that interplanetary disturbances originated by AR-CMEs associated with an MC are most geoeffective and cause powerful geomagnetic storms, while CIRs create only moderate and weak storms. Sporadic and recurrent events differ in values of the Dst index and southward component of the magnetic field, as well as in the relationship between them. For sporadic events, geomagnetic activity is more affected by the presence or absence of an MC than by the type of solar source. Interplanetary disturbances associated with AR-CMEs are more effective in SC 23 while those associated with other types of solar sources have approximately the same geoeffectiveness in both SCs.
引用
收藏
页数:28
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]  
Abunin A.A., 2012, Geomagn. Aeron, V52, P313, DOI [10.1134/S0016793212039924, DOI 10.1134/S0016793212039924]
[2]   Forbush Effects Created by Coronal Mass Ejections with Magnetic Clouds [J].
Abunina, M. A. ;
Belov, A. V. ;
Shlyk, N. S. ;
Eroshenko, E. A. ;
Abunin, A. A. ;
Oleneva, V. A. ;
Pryamushkina, I. I. ;
Yanke, V. G. .
GEOMAGNETISM AND AERONOMY, 2021, 61 (05) :678-687
[3]   Geoeffectiveness of corotating interaction regions as measured by Dst index [J].
Alves, M. V. ;
Echer, E. ;
Gonzalez, W. D. .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SPACE PHYSICS, 2006, 111 (A7)
[4]   Study of the Geoeffectiveness and Galactic Cosmic-Ray Response of VarSITI-ISEST Campaign Events in Solar Cycle 24 [J].
Aslam, O. P. M. ;
Badruddin .
SOLAR PHYSICS, 2017, 292 (09)
[5]   Study of the Forbush Decreases, Geomagnetic Storms, and Ground-Level Enhancements in Selected Intervals and Their Space Weather Implications [J].
Badruddin ;
Kumar, Anand .
SOLAR PHYSICS, 2015, 290 (04) :1271-1283
[6]   The Global Survey Method Applied to Ground-level Cosmic Ray Measurements [J].
Belov, A. ;
Eroshenko, E. ;
Yanke, V. ;
Oleneva, V. ;
Abunin, A. ;
Abunina, M. ;
Papaioannou, A. ;
Mavromichalaki, H. .
SOLAR PHYSICS, 2018, 293 (04)
[7]   Forbush effects and their connection with solar, interplanetary and geomagnetic phenomena [J].
Belov, A. V. .
UNIVERSAL HELIOPHYSICAL PROCESSES, 2009, (257) :439-450
[8]   What determines the magnitude of Forbush decreases? [J].
Belov, AV ;
Eroshenko, EA ;
Oleneva, VA ;
Struminsky, AB ;
Yanke, VG .
GALACTIC AND ANOMALOUS COSMIC RAYS IN THE HELIOSPHERE: THE CYCLE 22 SOLAR MINIMUM AND THE ONSET OF CYCLE 23, 2001, 27 (03) :625-630
[9]   Coronal mass ejections and forbush decreases [J].
Cane, HV .
SPACE SCIENCE REVIEWS, 2000, 93 (1-2) :55-77
[10]  
Chaddock RE, 1925, Principles and methods of statistics, P471