3D DEM analysis of the bearing behavior of lunar soil simulant under different loading plates

被引:4
作者
Xi, Banglu [1 ,2 ]
Jiang, Mingjing [3 ]
Mo, Pinqiang [2 ]
Liu, Xiaoxian [2 ]
Yang, Jiaqiang [2 ]
机构
[1] Hefei Univ Technol, Coll Civil Engn, Hefei 230009, Peoples R China
[2] China Univ Min & Technol, State Key Lab Geomech & Deep Underground Engn, Xuzhou 22100, Peoples R China
[3] Suzhou Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Civil Engn, Suzhou 2150092, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Lunar soil; Plate load test; Bearing capacity; Shape factor; Plate roughness; SHALLOW FOUNDATIONS; CAPACITY FACTORS; SHAPE FACTORS; PENETRATION; CONSTRUCTION; FOOTINGS;
D O I
10.1007/s10035-023-01355-6
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
The foundation of a lunar habitation may be either smooth or rough with different shapes in the light that various concepts of the lunar base have been proposed, which require a good understanding of the bearing behavior of the lunar soil under plates with different shapes and roughness. Therefore, the three-dimensional distinct element method (3D DEM) is employed here to perform plate load tests on lunar soil simulant using the force-driven method. The soil failure mechanism under different plates is first described at various scales with detailed DEM studies of the load-settlement curve, stress path, ground heave, void ratio changes, and normalized-velocity field. Following these, the shape factor and coefficient of plate roughness are discussed by comparing the DEM and theoretical results. The results show that a typical general failure model can be identified for the strip plate, a local failure model for the circular and square plates, and a Hill model for the smooth plate from the ground heave, void ratio changes, and normalized velocity field. The shape factors for bearing capacity determined by the settlement criterion are close to those by the Terzaghi method with an error of nearly 10%, and the shape factors for the deformation modulus are similar to those in Chinese standard with an error of nearly 20%. In addition, the coefficient of plate roughness for the semi-rough plate is close to those predicted by the Meyerhof and Kumar methods with an error of nearly 5%.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 53 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2009, GB 50021-2001
[2]   Engineering Properties of Lunar Soil Simulant JS']JSC-1A [J].
Arslan, Haydar ;
Batiste, Susan ;
Sture, Stein .
JOURNAL OF AEROSPACE ENGINEERING, 2010, 23 (01) :70-83
[3]   Engineering, design and construction of lunar bases [J].
Benaroya, H ;
Bernold, L ;
Chua, KM .
JOURNAL OF AEROSPACE ENGINEERING, 2002, 15 (02) :33-45
[4]  
Bhandari A., 2009, Contemporary Topics in Ground Modification, Problem Soils, and Geo-Support, P465
[5]   VERTICAL BEARING CAPACITY FACTORS FOR CIRCULAR AND STRIP FOOTINGS ON MOHR-COULOMB SOIL [J].
BOLTON, MD ;
LAU, CK .
CANADIAN GEOTECHNICAL JOURNAL, 1993, 30 (06) :1024-1033
[6]   Numerical and experimental studies of gravity effect on the mechanism of lunar excavations [J].
Bui, Ha H. ;
Kobayashi, Taizo ;
Fukagawa, Ryoichi ;
Wells, John C. .
JOURNAL OF TERRAMECHANICS, 2009, 46 (03) :115-124
[7]   Particle size distribution of lunar soil [J].
Carrier, WD .
JOURNAL OF GEOTECHNICAL AND GEOENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, 2003, 129 (10) :956-959
[8]  
CarrierIII WD, 1991, Lunar sourcebook, a user's guide to the moon, P475
[9]  
Chow P.Y., 1989, J. Aero. Eng., V2, P1
[10]   Plate Load Tests on Cemented Soil Layers Overlaying Weaker Soil [J].
Consoli, Nilo Cesar ;
Dalla Rosa, Francisco ;
Fonini, Anderson .
JOURNAL OF GEOTECHNICAL AND GEOENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, 2009, 135 (12) :1846-1856