Comparison of Accuracy of Freestyle Libre Pro and Medtronic iPro2 Continuous Glucose Monitoring Systems in Pregnancy

被引:2
作者
Golla, Kiran Kumar [1 ]
Gupta, Yashdeep [1 ,4 ]
Goyal, Alpesh [1 ]
Kalaivani, Mani [2 ]
Kachhawa, Garima [3 ]
Kulshrestha, Vidushi [3 ]
Sharma, Aparna. K. K. [3 ]
Meena, Jyoti [3 ]
Bharti, Juhi [3 ]
Sharma, Jai. B. B. [3 ]
Dadhwal, Vatsla [3 ]
Malhotra, Neena [3 ]
Bhatla, Neerja [3 ]
Tandon, Nikhil [1 ]
机构
[1] All India Inst Med Sci, Dept Endocrinol & Metab, New Delhi, India
[2] All India Inst Med Sci, Dept Biostat, New Delhi, India
[3] All India Inst Med Sci, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, New Delhi, India
[4] All India Inst Med Sci, Dept Endocrinol & Metab, New Delhi 110029, India
关键词
FSL-Pro system; iPro2; CGMS; MARD; Pregnancy; Gestational diabetes; SMBG; Asia; FLASH; WOMEN; TIME;
D O I
10.1089/dia.2023.0070
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
There are limited data on head-to-head performance of Freestyle Libre Pro (FSL-Pro) and blinded Medtronic iPro2 continuous glucose monitoring system in pregnancy. In this prospective observational study, women with hyperglycemia in pregnancy (n = 42) underwent simultaneous FSL-Pro and Medtronic iPro2 sensor insertion and self-monitoring of blood glucose using Contour Plus meter (reference). The overall mean absolute relative difference (MARD) for iPro2 and FSL-Pro systems were 8.0% +/- 9.2% and 19.0% +/- 12.7%, respectively. At hypoglycemic range, both sensors performed less accurately (MARD: 18.0% and 16.8%, respectively), whereas iPro2 showed higher accuracy at euglycemic (8.2% and 19.3%, respectively) and hyperglycemic (6.8% and 18.0%, respectively) ranges. On Bland-Altman analysis, iPro2 and FSL-Pro underestimated glucose by 0.01 and 1.09 mmol/L, respectively. The ISO criteria were fulfilled for 88.5% and 44.9% of all values, respectively. To conclude, iPro2 was more accurate; however, both sensors demonstrated inaccuracy at hypoglycemic range, highlighting the need for refinements in the current generation of sensors to address this problem.
引用
收藏
页码:538 / 542
页数:5
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   Evaluation of subcutaneous glucose monitoring systems under routine environmental conditions in patients with type 1 diabetes [J].
Aberer, Felix ;
Hajnsek, Martin ;
Rumpler, Markus ;
Zenz, Sabine ;
Baumann, Petra M. ;
Elsayed, Hesham ;
Puffing, Adelheid ;
Treiber, Gerlies ;
Pieber, Thomas R. ;
Sourij, Harald ;
Mader, Julia K. .
DIABETES OBESITY & METABOLISM, 2017, 19 (07) :1051-1055
[2]   Accuracy of flash glucose monitoring and continuous glucose monitoring technologies: Implications for clinical practice [J].
Ajjan, Ramzi A. ;
Cummings, Michael H. ;
Jennings, Peter ;
Leelarathna, Lalantha ;
Rayman, Gerry ;
Wilmot, Emma G. .
DIABETES & VASCULAR DISEASE RESEARCH, 2018, 15 (03) :175-184
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2015, IDF DIABETES ATLAS, V7th
[4]   Continuous glucose monitoring and metrics for clinical trials: an international consensus statement [J].
Battelino, Tadej ;
Alexander, Charles M. ;
Amiel, Stephanie A. ;
Arreaza-Rubin, Guillermo ;
Beck, Roy W. ;
Bergenstal, Richard M. ;
Buckingham, Bruce A. ;
Carroll, James ;
Ceriello, Antonio ;
Chow, Elaine ;
Choudhary, Pratik ;
Close, Kelly ;
Danne, Thomas ;
Dutta, Sanjoy ;
Gabbay, Robert ;
Garg, Satish ;
Heverly, Julie ;
Hirsch, Irl B. ;
Kader, Tina ;
Kenney, Julia ;
Kovatchev, Boris ;
Laffel, Lori ;
Maahs, David ;
Mathieu, Chantal ;
Mauricio, Didac ;
Nimri, Revital ;
Nishimura, Rimei ;
Scharf, Mauro ;
Del Prato, Stefano ;
Renard, Eric ;
Rosenstock, Julio ;
Saboo, Banshi ;
Ueki, Kohjiro ;
Umpierrez, Guillermo E. ;
Weinzimer, Stuart A. ;
Phillip, Moshe .
LANCET DIABETES & ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2023, 11 (01) :42-57
[5]   Head-to-head comparison between flash and continuous glucose monitoring systems in outpatients with type 1 diabetes [J].
Bonora, B. ;
Maran, A. ;
Ciciliot, S. ;
Avogaro, A. ;
Fadini, G. P. .
JOURNAL OF ENDOCRINOLOGICAL INVESTIGATION, 2016, 39 (12) :1391-1399
[6]   FreeStyle Libre and Dexcom G4 Platinum sensors: Accuracy comparisons during two weeks of home use and use during experimentally induced glucose excursions [J].
Boscari, F. ;
Galasso, S. ;
Facchinetti, A. ;
Marescotti, M. C. ;
Vallone, V. ;
Amato, A. M. L. ;
Avogaro, A. ;
Bruttomesso, D. .
NUTRITION METABOLISM AND CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES, 2018, 28 (02) :180-186
[7]  
Damiano Edward R, 2014, J Diabetes Sci Technol, V8, P699, DOI 10.1177/1932296814532203
[8]   Continuous glucose monitoring in pregnant women with type 1 diabetes (CONCEPTT): a multicentre international randomised controlled trial [J].
Feig, Denice S. ;
Donovan, Lois E. ;
Corcoy, Rosa ;
Murphy, Kellie E. ;
Amiel, Stephanie A. ;
Hunt, Katharine F. ;
Asztalos, Elizabeth ;
Barrett, Jon F. R. ;
Sanchez, J. Johanna ;
de Leiva, Alberto ;
Hod, Moshe ;
Jovanovic, Lois ;
Keely, Erin ;
McManus, Ruth ;
Hutton, Eileen K. ;
Meek, Claire L. ;
Stewart, Zoe A. ;
Wysocki, Tim ;
O'Brien, Robert ;
Ruedy, Katrina ;
Kollman, Craig ;
Tomlinson, George ;
Murphy, Helen R. .
LANCET, 2017, 390 (10110) :2347-2359
[9]   Comparison of the FreeStyle Libre Pro Flash Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) System and Point-of-Care Capillary Glucose Testing in Hospitalized Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Treated With Basal-Bolus Insulin Regimen [J].
Galindo, Rodolfo J. ;
Migdal, Alexandra L. ;
Davis, Georgia M. ;
Urrutia, Maria A. ;
Albury, Bonnie ;
Zambrano, Cesar ;
Vellanki, Priyathama ;
Pasquel, Francisco J. ;
Fayfman, Maya ;
Peng, Limin ;
Umpierrez, Guillermo E. .
DIABETES CARE, 2020, 43 (11) :2730-2735
[10]   Evaluation of the accuracy of FreeStyle(R) Libre™ during gestational diabetes: Is this device acceptable for decision making? [J].
Heindrichs, Amandine ;
Radermecker, Regis ;
Paquot, Nicolas ;
Philips, Jean-Christophe .
ACTA DIABETOLOGICA, 2020, 57 (12) :1519-1522