Psychometric properties of the psychosocial impact of assistive devices scale (PIADS): A systematic review

被引:11
作者
Atigossou, O. L. G. [1 ,2 ]
Honado, A. S. [3 ]
Routhier, F. [1 ,2 ]
Flamand, V. H. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Laval, Fac Med, Dept Rehabil, Quebec City, PQ, Canada
[2] Ctr Integre Univ Sante & Serv Sociaux Capitale Na, Ctr Interdisciplinary Res Rehabil & Social Integr, Quebec City, PQ, Canada
[3] Ctr Hosp Univ Dept Oueme & Plateau CHUD OP, Serv Reeduc, Porto Novo, Benin
关键词
assistive technology; psychometric properties; psychosocial impact; systematic review; TRANSLATION; STROKE;
D O I
10.1080/10400435.2021.2010149
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
The Psychosocial Impact of Assistive Devices Scale (PIADS) is commonly used to assess the psychosocial effects of an assistive device. Given its growing use, an appraisal of the evidence regarding its psychometric properties is required. We conduct a systematic review using validated critical appraisal scales to analyze both the quality and content of the evidence on the psychometric properties of the PIADS. PubMed/Medline, Embase, and CINAHL were systematically searched for identification of studies. Two independent reviewers appraised the retrieved studies using MacDermid and COSMIN-RoB checklists, and extracted data regarding the psychometric measurements reported. MacDermid scores showed that 8 out of 11 studies were, at least, of good methodological quality. COSMIN-RoB scores ranged from inadequate to very good. Except criterion and construct validity, which have presented a moderate level of evidence, the other psychometric properties assessed have demonstrated a high level of evidence. Cross-cultural validity, measurement error, and responsiveness have not been studied. Few studies have yet evaluated the psychometric properties of the PIADS. However, the quality of the evidence that they provide is mostly adequate. Therefore, this review supports the use of the PIADS, which has overall good psychometric properties.
引用
收藏
页码:211 / 219
页数:9
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]  
Andrich R., 2003, ASSIST TECHNOL, P917
[2]   The Anticipated Positive Psychosocial Impact of Present Web-Based E-Health Services and Future Mobile Health Applications: An Investigation among Older Swedes [J].
Axelsson, S. Wiklund ;
Nyberg, L. ;
Naslund, A. ;
Wikman, A. Melander .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TELEMEDICINE AND APPLICATIONS, 2013, 2013
[3]   Walking Aids for Enabling Activity and Participation: A Systematic Review [J].
Bertrand, Kim ;
Raymond, Marie-Helene ;
Miller, William C. ;
Martin Ginis, Kathleen A. ;
Demers, Louise .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE & REHABILITATION, 2017, 96 (12) :894-903
[4]  
Bollen K.A., 1989, Structural Equations with Latent Variables
[5]   Measuring functional outcome in Dupuytren's disease: A systematic review of patient-reported outcome measures [J].
Bradet-Levesque, Isabelle ;
Audet, Jessika ;
Roy, Jean-Sebastien ;
Flamand, Veronique H. .
JOURNAL OF HAND THERAPY, 2022, 35 (04) :613-627
[6]   Development and Validation of Korean Version of Psychosocial Impact of Assistive Devices Scale [J].
Chae, Soo-Young ;
Jo, Song-Jae .
ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY, 2014, 26 (01) :45-50
[7]  
Day H, 2001, DISABIL REHABIL, V23, P400
[8]  
Day H., 1996, Canadian Journal of Rehabilitation, V9, P159
[9]   The psychosocial impact of assistive devices scale (PIADS): Translation and preliminary psychometric evaluation of a Canadian-French version [J].
Demers, L ;
Monette, M ;
Descent, M ;
Jutai, J ;
Wolfson, C .
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2002, 11 (06) :583-592
[10]  
Devitt Rachel, 2004, Occup Ther Health Care, V17, P63, DOI 10.1080/J003v17n03_05