Synchronous self-assessment: First experience for higher education instructors

被引:1
作者
Remesal, Ana [1 ]
Estrada, Flor G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Barcelona, Fac Psicol, Dept Cogn Desarrollo & Psicol Educ, Barcelona, Spain
关键词
self-assessment; higher education; assessment literacy; teachers' conceptions of assessment; innovation; exam design; ASSESSMENT LITERACY; TEACHERS;
D O I
10.3389/feduc.2023.1115259
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
We present a qualitative study of four cases of university instructors (teacher educators) implementing synchronous self-assessment (SSA). SSA consists of an innovative assessment strategy during written exam situations, which highlights the students' voice and agency, giving it greater weight in the power balance traditionally established between instructors and students in classroom assessment practices. In this article, we focus on the effects and pedagogical potential of this assessment strategy from instructors' point of view. In our study, three instructors were novels in implementing this strategy; the fourth instructor had several years of experience with it. The four instructors agreed on basic design features for an end-of-semester exam offered in four groups of first-year students of the same shared program at a Bachelor's degree for Kindergarten Educator and Primary School Teacher. The instructors were individually interviewed after the assessment session in their course and the exams were gathered for analysis. Content and discursive analysis was carried out on the data. Results show substantial differences in the evaluative artefacts (instructors' exams) in terms of cognitive demand and formative assessment potential, and point to noticeable needs for professional development in pursuit of assessment literacy in Higher Education.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]  
Anderson L., 2001, TAXONOMY LEARNING TE
[2]   A Critical Review of Research on Student Self-Assessment [J].
Andrade, Heidi L. .
FRONTIERS IN EDUCATION, 2019, 4
[3]  
Beca J. P., 2019, REV PEDAGOG U DID CT, V6, P101, DOI [10.5354/0719-5885.2019.53747, DOI 10.5354/0719-5885.2019.53747]
[4]   Classroom assessment and pedagogy [J].
Black, Paul ;
Wiliam, Dylan .
ASSESSMENT IN EDUCATION-PRINCIPLES POLICY & PRACTICE, 2018, 25 (06) :551-575
[5]  
Bonner S., 2017, ANN M NATL COUNCIL M
[6]  
Boud D., 2018, Desarrollo del juicio evaluativo: evaluacion para conocer y producir un trabajo de calidad, P186, DOI DOI 10.4324/9781315109251-20
[7]  
Braun V., 2006, Qual Res Psychol, V3, P77, DOI [10.1191/1478088706qp063oa, DOI 10.1191/1478088706QP063OA, 10.1037/13620-004, DOI 10.1037/13620-004]
[8]  
Brown G. T. L., 2018, EMOTIONS 2 LANGUAGE, P205
[9]   Teachers' conceptions of assessment: Comparing two inventories with Ecuadorian teachers [J].
Brown, Gavin T. L. ;
Remesal, Ana .
STUDIES IN EDUCATIONAL EVALUATION, 2017, 55 :68-74
[10]   Validity and the design of classroom assessment in teacher teams [J].
Buckley-Walker, Kellie ;
Lipscombe, Kylie .
AUSTRALIAN EDUCATIONAL RESEARCHER, 2022, 49 (02) :425-444