In silico evaluation and selection of the best 16S rRNA gene primers for use in next-generation sequencing to detect oral bacteria and archaea

被引:10
作者
Regueira-Iglesias, Alba [1 ]
Vazquez-Gonzalez, Lara [2 ,3 ]
Balsa-Castro, Carlos [1 ]
Vila-Blanco, Nicolas [2 ,3 ]
Blanco-Pintos, Triana [1 ]
Tamames, Javier [4 ]
Jose Carreira, Maria [2 ,3 ]
Tomas, Inmaculada [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Santiago Compostela, Hlth Res Inst Fdn Santiago FIDIS, Sch Med & Dent, Oral Sci Res Grp,Dept Surg & Med Surg Specialties, C Entrerrios S-N, Santiago De Compostela 15872, Spain
[2] Univ Santiago Compostela, Hlth Res Inst Fdn Santiago FIDIS, Ctr Singular Invest Tecnol Intelixentes, Rua Jenaro Fuente S-N, Santiago De Compostela 15705, Spain
[3] Univ Santiago Compostela, Hlth Res Inst Fdn Santiago FIDIS, Dept Elect Comp, Rua Jenaro Fuente S-N, Santiago De Compostela 15705, Spain
[4] Ctr Nacl Biotecnol CNB CSIC, Syst Biol Dept, Microbiome Anal Lab, Madrid, Spain
关键词
16S rRNA gene; Primer; Coverage; Mouth; Bacteria; Archaea; Database; HUMAN MICROBIOME; SP-NOV; DATABASE; HEALTH; TOOLS; ASSOCIATION; PREVALENCE; DIVERSITY; CARIES;
D O I
10.1186/s40168-023-01481-6
中图分类号
Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Background Sequencing has been widely used to study the composition of the oral microbiome present in various health conditions. The extent of the coverage of the 16S rRNA gene primers employed for this purpose has not, however, been evaluated in silico using oral-specific databases. This paper analyses these primers using two databases containing 16S rRNA sequences from bacteria and archaea found in the human mouth and describes some of the best primers for each domain.Results A total of 369 distinct individual primers were identified from sequencing studies of the oral microbiome and other ecosystems. These were evaluated against a database reported in the literature of 16S rRNA sequences obtained from oral bacteria, which was modified by our group, and a self-created oral archaea database. Both databases contained the genomic variants detected for each included species. Primers were evaluated at the variant and species levels, and those with a species coverage (SC) =75.00% were selected for the pair analyses. All possible combinations of the forward and reverse primers were identified, with the resulting 4638 primer pairs also evaluated using the two databases. The best bacteria-specific pairs targeted the 3-4, 4-7, and 3-7 16S rRNA gene regions, with SC levels of 98.83-97.14%; meanwhile, the optimum archaea-specific primer pairs amplified regions 5-6, 3-6, and 3-6, with SC estimates of 95.88%. Finally, the best pairs for detecting both domains targeted regions 4-5, 3-5, and 5-9, and produced SC values of 95.71-94.54% and 99.48-96.91% for bacteria and archaea, respectively.Conclusions Given the three amplicon length categories (100-300, 301-600, and > 600 base pairs), the primer pairs with the best coverage values for detecting oral bacteria were as follows: KP_F048-OP_R043 (region 3-4; primer pair position for Escherichia coli J01859.1: 342-529), KP_F051-OP_R030 (4-7; 514-1079), and KP_F048-OP_R030 (3-7; 3421079). For detecting oral archaea, these were as follows: OP_F066-KP_R013 (5-6; 784-undefined), KP_F020-KP_R013 (3-6; 518-undefined), and OP_F114-KP_R013 (3-6; 340-undefined). Lastly, for detecting both domains jointly they were KP_F020-KP_R032 (4-5; 518-801), OP_F114-KP_R031 (3-5; 340-801), and OP_F066-OP_R121 (5-9; 784-1405). The primer pairs with the best coverage identified herein are not among those described most widely in the oral microbiome literature.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 90 条
  • [1] Species-Level Salivary Microbial Indicators of Well-Resolved Periodontitis: A Preliminary Investigation
    Acharya, Aneesha
    Chen, Tsute
    Chan, Yuki
    Watt, Rory M.
    Jin, Lijian
    Mattheos, Nikos
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN CELLULAR AND INFECTION MICROBIOLOGY, 2019, 9
  • [2] Acland A, 2013, NUCLEIC ACIDS RES, V41, pD8, DOI [10.1093/nar/gks1189, 10.1093/nar/gkx1095, 10.1093/nar/gkq1172]
  • [3] Newly designed 16S rRNA metabarcoding primers amplify diverse and novel archaeal taxa from the environment
    Bahram, Mohammad
    Anslan, Sten
    Hildebrand, Falk
    Bork, Peer
    Tedersoo, Leho
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY REPORTS, 2019, 11 (04): : 487 - 494
  • [4] Review and re-analysis of domain-specific 16S primers
    Baker, GC
    Smith, JJ
    Cowan, DA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MICROBIOLOGICAL METHODS, 2003, 55 (03) : 541 - 555
  • [5] Barnett M., 2020, REGEX
  • [6] Microbial profile comparisons of saliva, pooled and site-specific subgingival samples in periodontitis patients
    Belstrom, Daniel
    Sembler-Moller, Maria Lynn
    Grande, Maria Anastasia
    Kirkby, Nikolai
    Cotton, Sean Liam
    Paster, Bruce J.
    Holmstrup, Palle
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2017, 12 (08):
  • [7] Salivary microbiota in individuals with different levels of caries experience
    Belstrom, Daniel
    Holmstrup, Palle
    Fiehn, Nils-Erik
    Kirkby, Nikolai
    Kokaras, Alexis
    Paster, Bruce J.
    Bardow, Allan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2017, 9
  • [8] Saccharibacteria (TM7) in the Human Oral Microbiome
    Bor, B.
    Bedree, J. K.
    Shi, W.
    McLean, J. S.
    He, X.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 2019, 98 (05) : 500 - 509
  • [9] Callahan BJ, 2016, NAT METHODS, V13, P581, DOI [10.1038/NMETH.3869, 10.1038/nmeth.3869]
  • [10] Bacterial levels and amount of endotoxins in carious dentin within reversible pulpitis scenarios
    Caneppele, Taciana Marco Ferraz
    de Souza, Leticia Grilo
    Spinola, Manuela da Silva
    de Oliveira, Felipe Eduardo
    de Oliveira, Luciane Dias
    Carvalho, Claudio Antonio Talge
    Bresciani, Eduardo
    [J]. CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2021, 25 (05) : 3033 - 3042