Patient-facing digital tools for delivering genetic services: a systematic review

被引:25
作者
Lee, Whiwon [1 ,2 ]
Shickh, Salma [2 ,3 ]
Assamad, Daniel [1 ]
Luca, Stephanie [1 ]
Clausen, Marc [3 ]
Somerville, Cherith [1 ]
Tafler, Abby [1 ]
Shaw, Angela [3 ,4 ]
Hayeems, Robin [1 ,2 ]
Bombard, Yvonne [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Sick Children, Child Hlth Evaluat Sci, Toronto, ON, Canada
[2] Univ Toronto, Inst Hlth Policy Management & Evaluat, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] Unity Hlth Toronto, St Michaels Hosp, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Inst, Genom Hlth Serv Res Program, Toronto, ON, Canada
[4] Illumina, San Diego, CA USA
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
Genetics; Patient Care; Genetic Testing; Genetic Counseling; VIRTUAL CARE; HEALTH;
D O I
10.1136/jmg-2022-108653
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
This study systematically reviewed the literature on the impact of digital genetics tools on patient care and system efficiencies. MEDLINE and Embase were searched for articles published between January 2010 and March 2021. Studies evaluating the use of patient-facing digital tools in the context of genetic service delivery were included. Two reviewers screened and extracted patient-reported and system-focused outcomes from each study. Data were synthesised using a descriptive approach. Of 3226 unique studies identified, 87 were included. A total of 70 unique digital tools were identified. As a result of using digital tools, 84% of studies reported a positive outcome in at least one of the following patient outcomes: knowledge, psychosocial well-being, behavioural/management changes, family communication, decision-making or level of engagement. Digital tools improved workflow and efficiency for providers and reduced the amount of time they needed to spend with patients. However, we identified a misalignment between study purpose and patient-reported outcomes measured and a lack of tools that encompass the entire genetic counselling and testing trajectory. Given increased demand for genetic services and the shift towards virtual care, this review provides evidence that digital tools can be used to efficiently deliver patient-centred care. Future research should prioritise development, evaluation and implementation of digital tools that can support the entire patient trajectory across a range of clinical settings. PROSPERO registration numberCRD42020202862.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 10
页数:10
相关论文
共 48 条
  • [11] The state of the medical geneticist workforce: Findings of the 2003 survey of American Board of Medical Genetics certified geneticists
    Cooksey, JA
    Forte, G
    Benkendorf, J
    Blitzer, MG
    [J]. GENETICS IN MEDICINE, 2005, 7 (06) : 439 - 443
  • [12] Patient Portals Facilitating Engagement With Inpatient Electronic Medical Records: A Systematic Review
    Dendere, Ronald
    Slade, Christine
    Burton-Jones, Andrew
    Sullivan, Clair
    Staib, Andrew
    Janda, Monika
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2019, 21 (04)
  • [13] Virtual care in end of life and palliative care: A rapid evidence check
    Dolan, Hankiz
    Eggett, Catherine
    Holliday, Laura
    Delves, Shane
    Parkes, Donna
    Sutherland, Kim
    [J]. JOURNAL OF TELEMEDICINE AND TELECARE, 2021, 27 (10) : 631 - 637
  • [14] Mainstreaming Genetic Testing for Adult Patients With Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease
    Elliott, Mark D.
    James, Leslie C.
    Simms, Emily L.
    Sharma, Priyana
    Girard, Louis P.
    Cheema, Kim
    Elliott, Meghan J.
    Lauzon, Julie L.
    Chun, Justin
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY HEALTH AND DISEASE, 2021, 8
  • [15] Adoption of Digital Technologies in Health Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Systematic Review of Early Scientific Literature
    Golinelli, Davide
    Boetto, Erik
    Carullo, Gherardo
    Nuzzolese, Andrea Giovanni
    Landini, Maria Paola
    Fantini, Maria Pia
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2020, 22 (11)
  • [16] Hereditary cancer risk assessment: essential tools for a better approach
    Gomy, Israel
    Estevez Diz, Maria Del Pilar
    [J]. HEREDITARY CANCER IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2013, 11
  • [17] Benefits and limitations of telegenetics: A literature review
    Gorrie, Anita
    Gold, Judy
    Cameron, Carolyn
    Krause, Molly
    Kincaid, Helen
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GENETIC COUNSELING, 2021, 30 (04) : 924 - 937
  • [18] Development of Breast Cancer Choices: a decision support tool for young women with breast cancer deciding whether to have genetic testing for BRCA1/2 mutations
    Grimmett, Chloe
    Brooks, Charlotte
    Recio-Saucedo, Alejandra
    Armstrong, Anne
    Cutress, Ramsey I.
    Evans, D. Gareth
    Copson, Ellen
    Turner, Lesley
    Meiser, Bettina
    Wakefield, Claire E.
    Eccles, Diana
    Foster, Claire
    [J]. SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2019, 27 (01) : 297 - 309
  • [19] Gunasekeran DV, 2021, LANCET DIGIT HEALTH, V3, pe124, DOI 10.1016/S2589-7500(20)30287-9
  • [20] Utility of Genetic Testing from the Perspective of Parents/Caregivers: A Scoping Review
    Hayeems, Robin Z.
    Luca, Stephanie
    Assamad, Daniel
    Bhatt, Ayushi
    Ungar, Wendy J.
    [J]. CHILDREN-BASEL, 2021, 8 (04):