Patient-facing digital tools for delivering genetic services: a systematic review

被引:25
作者
Lee, Whiwon [1 ,2 ]
Shickh, Salma [2 ,3 ]
Assamad, Daniel [1 ]
Luca, Stephanie [1 ]
Clausen, Marc [3 ]
Somerville, Cherith [1 ]
Tafler, Abby [1 ]
Shaw, Angela [3 ,4 ]
Hayeems, Robin [1 ,2 ]
Bombard, Yvonne [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Sick Children, Child Hlth Evaluat Sci, Toronto, ON, Canada
[2] Univ Toronto, Inst Hlth Policy Management & Evaluat, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] Unity Hlth Toronto, St Michaels Hosp, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Inst, Genom Hlth Serv Res Program, Toronto, ON, Canada
[4] Illumina, San Diego, CA USA
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
Genetics; Patient Care; Genetic Testing; Genetic Counseling; VIRTUAL CARE; HEALTH;
D O I
10.1136/jmg-2022-108653
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
This study systematically reviewed the literature on the impact of digital genetics tools on patient care and system efficiencies. MEDLINE and Embase were searched for articles published between January 2010 and March 2021. Studies evaluating the use of patient-facing digital tools in the context of genetic service delivery were included. Two reviewers screened and extracted patient-reported and system-focused outcomes from each study. Data were synthesised using a descriptive approach. Of 3226 unique studies identified, 87 were included. A total of 70 unique digital tools were identified. As a result of using digital tools, 84% of studies reported a positive outcome in at least one of the following patient outcomes: knowledge, psychosocial well-being, behavioural/management changes, family communication, decision-making or level of engagement. Digital tools improved workflow and efficiency for providers and reduced the amount of time they needed to spend with patients. However, we identified a misalignment between study purpose and patient-reported outcomes measured and a lack of tools that encompass the entire genetic counselling and testing trajectory. Given increased demand for genetic services and the shift towards virtual care, this review provides evidence that digital tools can be used to efficiently deliver patient-centred care. Future research should prioritise development, evaluation and implementation of digital tools that can support the entire patient trajectory across a range of clinical settings. PROSPERO registration numberCRD42020202862.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 10
页数:10
相关论文
共 48 条
  • [1] Assessing an Interactive Online Tool to Support Parents' Genomic Testing Decisions
    Adam, Shelin
    Birch, Patricia H.
    Coe, Rachel R.
    Bansback, Nick
    Jones, Adrian L.
    Connolly, Mary B.
    Demos, Michelle K.
    Toyota, Eric B.
    Farrer, Matthew J.
    Friedman, Jan M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GENETIC COUNSELING, 2019, 28 (01) : 10 - 17
  • [2] Genetics in mainstream medicine: Finally within grasp to influence healthcare globally
    Aradhya, Swaroop
    Nussbaum, Robert L.
    [J]. MOLECULAR GENETICS & GENOMIC MEDICINE, 2018, 6 (04): : 473 - 480
  • [3] Implementation and Outcomes of Virtual Care Across a Tertiary Cancer Center During COVID-19
    Berlin, Alejandro
    Lovas, Mike
    Truong, Tran
    Melwani, Sheena
    Liu, Justin
    Liu, Zhihui Amy
    Badzynski, Adam
    Carpenter, Mary Beth
    Virtanen, Carl
    Morley, Lyndon
    Bhattacharyya, Onil
    Escaf, Marnie
    Moody, Lesley
    Goldfarb, Avi
    Brzozowski, Luke
    Cafazzo, Joseph
    Chua, Melvin L. K.
    Stewart, A. Keith
    Krzyzanowska, Monika K.
    [J]. JAMA ONCOLOGY, 2021, 7 (04) : 597 - 602
  • [4] Interactive e-counselling for genetics pre-test decisions: where are we now?
    Birch, P. H.
    [J]. CLINICAL GENETICS, 2015, 87 (03) : 209 - 217
  • [5] DECIDE: a Decision Support Tool to Facilitate Parents' Choices Regarding Genome-Wide Sequencing
    Birch, Patricia
    Adam, S.
    Bansback, N.
    Coe, R. R.
    Hicklin, J.
    Lehman, A.
    Li, K. C.
    Friedman, J. M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GENETIC COUNSELING, 2016, 25 (06) : 1298 - 1308
  • [6] How digital tools can advance quality and equity in genomic medicine
    Bombard, Yvonne
    Hayeems, Robin Z.
    [J]. NATURE REVIEWS GENETICS, 2020, 21 (09) : 505 - 506
  • [7] The Genomics ADvISER: development and usability testing of a decision aid for the selection of incidental sequencing results
    Bombard, Yvonne
    Clausen, Marc
    Mighton, Chloe
    Carlsson, Lindsay
    Casalino, Selina
    Glogowski, Emily
    Schrader, Kasmintan
    Evans, Michael
    Scheer, Adena
    Baxter, Nancy
    Hamilton, Jada G.
    Lerner-Ellis, Jordan
    Offit, Kenneth
    Robson, Mark
    Laupacis, Andreas
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2018, 26 (07) : 984 - 995
  • [8] Videoconferencing to deliver genetics services: a systematic review of telegenetics in light of the COVID-19 pandemic
    Brown, Elizabeth G.
    Watts, Isabella
    Beales, Emily R.
    Maudhoo, Ashwini
    Hayward, Judith
    Sheridan, Eamonn
    Rafi, Imran
    [J]. GENETICS IN MEDICINE, 2021, 23 (08) : 1438 - 1449
  • [9] Cella D, 2015, PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES IN PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT, P1, DOI 10.3768/rtipress.2015.bk.0014.1509
  • [10] Concert Genetics, 2018, CURR LANDSC GEN TEST