An Improved Rank Order Centroid Method (IROC) for Criteria Weight Estimation: An Application in the Engine/Vehicle Selection Problem

被引:11
作者
Hatefi, Mohammad Ali [1 ]
机构
[1] Petr Univ Technol PUT, Dept Energy Econ & Management, Sattarkhan Ave, Khosrow Jonoubi St, Tehran, Iran
关键词
MCDM; criteria weighting; approximate weighting methods; ROC; IROC; simulation; engine; vehicle selection problem; public transport; DECISION-MAKING; RATIO ANALYSIS; TRANSPORTATION; INFORMATION; ALTERNATIVES; SCENARIO;
D O I
10.15388/23-INFOR507
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
The focus of this paper is on the criteria weight approximation in Multiple Criteria Decision Making (MCDM). An approximate weighting method produces the weights that are surrogates for the exact values that cannot be elicited directly from the DM. In this field, a very famous model is Rank Order Centroid (ROC). The paper shows that there is a drawback to the ROC method that could be resolved. The paper gives an idea to develop a revised version of the ROC method called Improved ROC (IROC). The behaviour of the IROC method is investigated using a set of simulation experiments. The IROC method could be employed in situations of time pressure, imprecise information, etc. The paper also proposes a methodology including the application of the IROC method in a group decision making mode, to estimate the weights of the criteria in a tree-shaped structure. The proposed methodology is useful for academics/managers/decision makers who want to deal with MCDM problem. A study case is examined to show applicability of the proposed methodology in a real-world situation. This case is engine/vehicle selection problem, that is one of the fundamental challenges of road transport sector of any country.
引用
收藏
页码:249 / 270
页数:22
相关论文
共 63 条
[1]   Assessing feasibility of overnight-charging electric bus in a real-world BRT system in the context of a developing country [J].
Abbasi, M. ;
Hosseinlou, M. Hadji .
SCIENTIA IRANICA, 2022, 29 (06) :2968-2978
[2]   Least-squared ordered weighted averaging operator weights [J].
Ahn, Byeong Seok ;
Park, Haechurl .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS, 2008, 23 (01) :33-49
[3]   Comparing methods for multiattribute decision making with ordinal weights [J].
Ahn, Byeong Seok ;
Park, Kyung Sam .
COMPUTERS & OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2008, 35 (05) :1660-1670
[4]   Approximate weighting method for multiattribute decision problems with imprecise parameters [J].
Ahn, Byeong Seok .
OMEGA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2017, 72 :87-95
[6]   Assigning Cardinal Weights in Multi-Criteria Decision Making Based on Ordinal Ranking [J].
Alfares, Hesham ;
Duffuaa, Salih .
JOURNAL OF MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION ANALYSIS, 2008, 15 (5-6) :125-133
[7]   Simulation-Based Evaluation of Criteria Rank-Weighting Methods in Multi-Criteria Decision-Making [J].
Alfares, Hesham K. ;
Duffuaa, Salih O. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY & DECISION MAKING, 2016, 15 (01) :43-61
[8]   Transition towards sustainable transportation - What determines fuel choice? [J].
Andersson, Linda ;
Ek, Kristina ;
Kastensson, Asa ;
Warell, Linda .
TRANSPORT POLICY, 2020, 90 :31-38
[9]  
Asilata M.D., 2015, J ENG RES APPL, V5, P91
[10]   Decision quality using ranked attribute weights [J].
Barron, FH ;
Barrett, BE .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1996, 42 (11) :1515-1523