Sustainable Lean Six Sigma project selection in manufacturing environments using best-worst method

被引:10
作者
Swarnakar, Vikas [1 ]
Singh, A. R. [2 ]
Antony, Jiju [1 ]
Tiwari, Anil Kr [2 ]
Garza-Reyes, Jose Arturo [3 ]
机构
[1] Khalifa Univ, Dept Ind & Syst Engn, Abu Dhabi, U Arab Emirates
[2] Natl Inst Technol, Dept Mech Engn, Raipur, Madhya Pradesh, India
[3] Univ Derby, Ctr Supply Chain Improvement, Derby, England
关键词
Sustainable LSS; project selection; best worst method; sensitivity analysis; automotive component manufacturing organization; SUPPLIER SELECTION; GREEN; PRIORITIZATION; PERFORMANCE; BARRIERS;
D O I
10.1080/14783363.2022.2139675
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Manufacturing organizations have struggled with selecting right projects for sustainable LSS (SLSS) programs for operational excellence. This study is to propose a method for effective assessment of optimal SLSS projects. The importance weight of project selection criteria and prioritization of available projects are calculated using the novel best-worst-method (BWM) approach. The proposed methodology was authenticated through a real case example. The outcome reveals that out of five SLSS projects, P-1 is the optimal project. Project P-1 is the most significant production line for deploying the SLSS in case organization. The optimality in project ranking is tested through sensitivity analysis, the outcome noticed minimum sensitivity that claimed robust findings. This study is to be unique as there was very little evidence of prioritizing SLSS projects by utilizing a large set of criteria and applying the BWM approach. Further, BWM is the most suitable and reliable approach for prioritizing the alternatives when a large number of criteria are involved and it provides consistent outcomes with fewer inputs. The applied methodology will help top management to select the right project and opportunities in complex situations. Decision-makers and LSS consultants can also adopt the same approach for effective assessment of optimal SLSS projects for sustainable development.
引用
收藏
页码:990 / 1014
页数:25
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]   Evaluation of the external forces affecting the sustainability of oil and gas supply chain using Best Worst Method [J].
Ahmad, Wan Nurul Karimah Wan ;
Rezaei, Jafar ;
Sadaghiani, Saman ;
Tavasszy, Lorant A. .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2017, 153 (01) :242-252
[2]   A novel and practical conceptual framework to support Lean Six Sigma deployment in manufacturing SMEs [J].
Alexander, Paul ;
Antony, Jiju ;
Cudney, Elizabeth .
TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT & BUSINESS EXCELLENCE, 2022, 33 (11-12) :1233-1263
[3]   Best-worst method for robot selection [J].
Ali, Asif ;
Rashid, Tabasam .
SOFT COMPUTING, 2021, 25 (01) :563-583
[4]  
Allen MS, 2014, J PAC ARCHAEOL, V5, P1
[5]  
Antony J., 2019, The Ten Commandments of Lean Six Sigma, P17, DOI [DOI 10.1108/978-1-78973-687-820191004, 10.1108/978-1-78973-687-820191004]
[6]   Using Six Sigma DMAIC for Lean project management in education: a case study in a German kindergarten [J].
Antony, Jiju ;
Scheumann, Tim ;
Sunder, Vijaya M. ;
Cudney, Elizabeth ;
Rodgers, Bryan ;
Grigg, Nigel P. .
TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT & BUSINESS EXCELLENCE, 2022, 33 (13-14) :1489-1509
[7]   Lean Six Sigma in policing services: case examples, lessons learnt and directions for future research [J].
Antony, Jiju ;
Rodgers, Bryan ;
Cudney, Elizabeth A. .
TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT & BUSINESS EXCELLENCE, 2019, 30 (5-6) :613-625
[8]  
Bazrkar A, 2017, QUAL-ACCESS SUCCESS, V18, P72
[9]   A cognitive map integrated intuitionistic fuzzy decision-making procedure for provider selection in project management [J].
Dursun, Mehtap ;
Goker, Nazli ;
Mutlu, Hakan .
JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT & FUZZY SYSTEMS, 2020, 39 (05) :6645-6655
[10]   Embedding sustainability in lean six sigma efforts [J].
Erdil, Nadiye O. ;
Aktas, Can B. ;
Arani, Omid M. .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 198 :520-529