Object-based attention during scene perception elicits boundary contraction in memory

被引:2
|
作者
Hall, Elizabeth H. [1 ,2 ]
Geng, Joy J. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Davis, Dept Psychol, Davis, CA 95616 USA
[2] Univ Calif Davis, Ctr Mind & Brain, Davis, CA 95618 USA
关键词
Boundary extension; Selective attention; Scene perception; Object affordances; EYE-MOVEMENTS; EXTENSION; REPRESENTATION; PICTURES; AROUSAL; LOOKING; EDGES; VIEW;
D O I
10.3758/s13421-024-01540-9
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Boundary contraction and extension are two types of scene transformations that occur in memory. In extension, viewers extrapolate information beyond the edges of the image, whereas in contraction, viewers forget information near the edges. Recent work suggests that image composition influences the direction and magnitude of boundary transformation. We hypothesize that selective attention at encoding is an important driver of boundary transformation effects, selective attention to specific objects at encoding leading to boundary contraction. In this study, one group of participants (N = 36) memorized 15 scenes while searching for targets, while a separate group (N = 36) just memorized the scenes. Both groups then drew the scenes from memory with as much object and spatial detail as they could remember. We asked online workers to provide ratings of boundary transformations in the drawings, as well as how many objects they contained and the precision of remembered object size and location. We found that search condition drawings showed significantly greater boundary contraction than drawings of the same scenes in the memorize condition. Search drawings were significantly more likely to contain target objects, and the likelihood to recall other objects in the scene decreased as a function of their distance from the target. These findings suggest that selective attention to a specific object due to a search task at encoding will lead to significant boundary contraction.
引用
收藏
页码:6 / 18
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Dissociating location-based and object-based cue validity effects in object-based attention
    Chou, Wei-Lun
    Yeh, Su-Ling
    VISION RESEARCH, 2018, 143 : 34 - 41
  • [22] Object-Based Target Templates Guide Attention During Visual Search
    Berggren, Nick
    Eimer, Martin
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 2018, 44 (09) : 1368 - 1382
  • [23] Object-based attention generalizes to multisurface objects
    Erlikhman, Gennady
    Lytchenko, Taissa
    Heller, Nathan H.
    Maechier, Marvin R.
    Caplovitz, Gideon P.
    ATTENTION PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 2020, 82 (04) : 1599 - 1612
  • [24] The impact of monetary stimuli on object-based attention
    Zhao, Jingjing
    Song, Fangxing
    Zhou, Sicen
    Hu, Saisai
    Liu, Dawei
    Wang, Yonghui
    Kong, Feng
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2020, 111 (03) : 460 - 472
  • [25] Target frequency modulates object-based attention
    Nah, Joseph C.
    Shomstein, Sarah
    PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 2020, 27 (05) : 981 - 989
  • [26] Object-based attention is mediated by collinearity of targets
    Crundall, David
    Cole, Geoff G.
    Galpin, Adam
    QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2007, 60 (01) : 137 - 153
  • [27] The Perceptual Root of Object-Based Storage: An Interactive Model of Perception and Visual Working Memory
    Gao, Tao
    Gao, Zaifeng
    Li, Jie
    Sun, Zhongqiang
    Shen, Mowei
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 2011, 37 (06) : 1803 - 1823
  • [28] Perceptual Load Modulates Object-Based Attention
    Ho, Ming-Chou
    Atchley, Paul
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 2009, 35 (06) : 1661 - 1669
  • [29] Effects of instantaneous object input and past experience on object-based attention
    Ho, Ming-Chou
    Yeh, Su-Ling
    ACTA PSYCHOLOGICA, 2009, 132 (01) : 31 - 39
  • [30] Is Object-Based Attention Mandatory? Strategic Control Over Mode of Attention
    Yeari, Menahem
    Goldsmith, Morris
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 2010, 36 (03) : 565 - 579