Differential diagnosis of atypical and anaplastic meningiomas based on conventional MRI features and ADC histogram parameters using a logistic regression model nomogram

被引:2
作者
Han, Tao [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Long, Changyou [5 ]
Liu, Xianwang [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Jing, Mengyuan [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Zhang, Yuting [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Deng, Liangna [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Zhang, Bin [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Zhou, Junlin [1 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Lanzhou Univ Second Hosp, Dept Radiol, Lanzhou, Peoples R China
[2] Lanzhou Univ, Clin Sch 2, Lanzhou, Peoples R China
[3] Key Lab Med Imaging Gansu Prov, Lanzhou, Peoples R China
[4] Gansu Int Sci & Technol Cooperat Base Med Imaging, Lanzhou 730030, Peoples R China
[5] Qinghai Univ, Affiliated Hosp, Image Ctr, Xining, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Meningioma; Magnetic resonance image; Histogram analysis; Nomogram; APPARENT DIFFUSION-COEFFICIENT; HIGH-GRADE MENINGIOMA; TUMOR;
D O I
10.1007/s10143-023-02155-5
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
The purpose of the study was to determine the value of a logistic regression model nomogram based on conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) features and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) histogram parameters in differentiating atypical meningioma (AtM) from anaplastic meningioma (AnM). Clinical and imaging data of 34 AtM and 21 AnM diagnosed by histopathology were retrospectively analyzed. The whole tumor delineation along the tumor edge on ADC images and ADC histogram parameters were automatically generated and comparisons between the two groups using the independent samples t test or Mann-Whitney U test. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to construct the nomogram of the AtM and AnM prediction model, and the model's predictive efficacy was evaluated using calibration and decision curves. Significant differences in the mean, enhancement, perc.01%, and edema were noted between the AtM and AnM groups (P < 0.05). Age, sex, location, necrosis, shape, max-D, variance, skewness, kurtosis, perc.10%, perc.50%, perc.90%, and perc.99% exhibited no significant differences (P > 0.05). The mean and enhancement were independent risk factors for distinguishing AtM from AnM. The area under the curve, accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of the nomogram were 0.871 (0.753-0.946), 80.0%, 81.0%, 79.4%, 70.8%, and 87.1%, respectively. The calibration curve demonstrated that the model's probability to predict AtM and AnM was in favorable agreement with the actual probability, and the decision curve revealed that the prediction model possessed satisfactory clinical availability. A logistic regression model nomogram based on conventional MRI features and ADC histogram parameters is potentially useful as an auxiliary tool for the preoperative differential diagnosis of AtM and AnM.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 32 条
  • [1] Current treatment options for meningioma
    Apra, Caroline
    Peyre, Matthieu
    Kalamarides, Michel
    [J]. EXPERT REVIEW OF NEUROTHERAPEUTICS, 2018, 18 (03) : 241 - 249
  • [2] Histological Grade of Meningioma: Prediction by Intravoxel Incoherent Motion Histogram Parameters
    Bohara, Manisha
    Nakajo, Masanori
    Kamimura, Kiyohisa
    Yoneyama, Tomohide
    Fukukura, Yoshihiko
    Kiyao, Yutaro
    Yonezawa, Hajime
    Higa, Nayuta
    Kirishima, Mari
    Yoshiura, Takashi
    [J]. ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2020, 27 (03) : 342 - 353
  • [3] T1 and ADC histogram parameters may be an in vivo biomarker for predicting the grade, subtype, and proliferative activity of meningioma
    Cao, Tiexin
    Jiang, Rifeng
    Zheng, Lingmin
    Zhang, Rufei
    Chen, Xiaodan
    Wang, Zongmeng
    Jiang, Peirong
    Chen, Yilin
    Zhong, Tianjin
    Chen, Hu
    Wu, PuYeh
    Xue, Yunjing
    Lin, Lin
    [J]. EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2023, 33 (01) : 258 - 269
  • [4] Establishment and Validation of an Integrated Model to Predict Postoperative Recurrence in Patients With Atypical Meningioma
    Chen, Xiao-Yong
    Chen, Jin-Yuan
    Huang, Yin-Xing
    Xu, Jia-Heng
    Sun, Wei-Wei
    Yue-Chen
    Ding, Chen-Yu
    Wang, Shuo-Bin
    Wu, Xi-Yue
    Kang, De-Zhi
    You, Hong-Hai
    Lin, Yuan-Xiang
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2021, 11
  • [5] Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Histograms of Human Papillomavirus-Positive and Human Papillomavirus-Negative Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Assessment of Tumor Heterogeneity and Comparison with Histopathology
    de Perrot, T.
    Lenoir, V.
    Ayllon, M. Domingo
    Dulguerov, N.
    Pusztaszeri, M.
    Becker, M.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NEURORADIOLOGY, 2017, 38 (11) : 2153 - 2160
  • [6] Atypical and anaplastic meningioma: outcomes in a population based study
    Garzon-Muvdi, T.
    Yang, W.
    Lim, M.
    Brem, H.
    Huang, J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEURO-ONCOLOGY, 2017, 133 (02) : 321 - 330
  • [7] Diffusion Profiling via a Histogram Approach Distinguishes Low-grade from High-grade Meningiomas, Can Reflect the Respective Proliferative Potential and Progesterone Receptor Status
    Gihr, Georg Alexander
    Horvath-Rizea, Diana
    Garnov, Nikita
    Kohlhof-Meinecke, Patricia
    Ganslandt, Oliver
    Henkes, Hans
    Meyer, Hans Jonas
    Hoffmann, Karl-Titus
    Surov, Alexey
    Schob, Stefan
    [J]. MOLECULAR IMAGING AND BIOLOGY, 2018, 20 (04) : 632 - 640
  • [8] EANO guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of meningiomas
    Goldbrunner, Roland
    Minniti, Giuseppe
    Preusser, Matthias
    Jenkinson, Michael D.
    Sallabanda, Kita
    Houdart, Emmanuel
    von Deimling, Andreas
    Stavrinou, Pantelis
    Lefranc, Florence
    Lund-Johansen, Morten
    Moyal, Elizabeth Cohen-Jonathan
    Brandsma, Dieta
    Henriksson, Roger
    Etti, Riccardo Soffi
    Weller, Michael
    [J]. LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2016, 17 (09) : E383 - E391
  • [9] Differentiating atypical meningioma from anaplastic meningioma using diffusion weighted imaging
    Han, Tao
    Zhang, Jing
    Liu, Xianwang
    Zhang, Bin
    Deng, Liangna
    Lin, Xiaoqiang
    Jing, Mengyuan
    Zhou, Junlin
    [J]. CLINICAL IMAGING, 2022, 82 : 237 - 243
  • [10] Prediction of high-grade meningioma by preoperative MRI assessment
    Kawahara, Yosuke
    Nakada, Mitsutoshi
    Hayashi, Yutaka
    Kai, Yutaka
    Hayashi, Yasuhiko
    Uchiyama, Naoyuki
    Nakamura, Hiroyuki
    Kuratsu, Jun-ichi
    Hamada, Jun-ichiro
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEURO-ONCOLOGY, 2012, 108 (01) : 147 - 152