Human reliability modeling in occupational environments toward a safe and productive operator 4.0

被引:6
|
作者
Kheiri, Setareh Kazemi [1 ]
Vahedi, Zahra [1 ]
Sun, Hongyue [1 ]
Megahed, Fadel M. [2 ]
Cavuoto, Lora A. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] SUNY Buffalo, Ind & Syst Engn, Buffalo, NY 14260 USA
[2] Miami Univ, Farmer Sch Business, Oxford, OH 45056 USA
[3] 407 Bell Hall, Buffalo, NY 14260 USA
关键词
Human reliability analysis; Operator; 4; 0; Upper-limb fatigue; Wearable sensors; UPPER-LIMB; FATIGUE FAILURE; SHOULDER; WORK; DISORDERS; FORCE; TASK; MUSCLE; MOTION; CHALLENGES;
D O I
10.1016/j.ergon.2023.103479
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Many occupational environments require labor intensive activities, which could result in fatigue and injuries and cause decreased work performance. Recently, the breakthroughs of Industry 4.0 have allowed for tracking worker conditions. Based on these, various analytical models have been performed with the aim of guiding work design in occupational environments, which contributes to ultimately achieving a safe and productive Operator 4.0. However, there is a lack of systematic analysis and implementation guidelines. In this paper, we review the literature on upper-limb fatigue modeling in occupational settings, since it is reported shoulder injuries are a pressing issue. From the reviewed papers, our main observations are that the majority of studies focus on identifying human fatigue/reliability indices, and the corresponding factors contributing to these indices, through statistical and biomechanical models. However, existing models lack the consideration of several important aspects of upper-limb fatigue analysis, such as the full use of wearable sensor data in a real-time manner, consideration of the heterogeneity of workers and measurement devices, and the difference between simulated and actual work environment. Moreover, the issue of fatigue development for the workers' upper extremities, which could significantly have an impact on workers' performance, has not yet been studied from a system reliability point of view to the best of the authors' knowledge. Reliability engineering models that are widely used to model machines can play an important role in modeling humans in occupational settings. We discuss the limitations of the reviewed articles and provide insights for future research.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 7 条
  • [1] Modeling Human Operator and Process in Different Environments
    Kovacevic, Darko
    Posa, Anita
    Pribacic, Nikica
    Antonic, Radovan
    Kovacevic, Asja
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ITI 2009 31ST INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY INTERFACES, 2009, : 299 - 304
  • [2] Modeling Human Operator Controlling Process in Different Environments
    Kovacevic, Darko
    Pribacic, Nikica
    Jovic, Mate
    Antonic, Radovan
    Kovacevic, Asja
    ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORKS - ICANN 2009, PT II, 2009, 5769 : 475 - +
  • [3] Toward production operator 4.0: modelling Human-Machine Cooperation in Industry 4.0 with Cognitive Work Analysis
    Guerin, C.
    Rauffet, P.
    Chauvin, C.
    Martin, E.
    IFAC PAPERSONLINE, 2019, 52 (19): : 73 - 78
  • [4] Modeling of the Human Operator Reliability with the Aid of the Sugeno Fuzzy Knowledge Base
    Rotshtein, A. P.
    Shtovba, S. D.
    AUTOMATION AND REMOTE CONTROL, 2009, 70 (01) : 163 - 169
  • [5] Modeling of the human operator reliability with the aid of the Sugeno fuzzy knowledge base
    A. P. Rotshtein
    S. D. Shtovba
    Automation and Remote Control, 2009, 70 : 163 - 169
  • [6] Hierarchical Bayesian modeling for predictive environmental microbiology toward a safe use of human excreta: Systematic review and meta -analysis
    Oishi, Wakana
    Kadoya, Syun-suke
    Nishimura, Osamu
    Rose, Joan B.
    Sano, Daisuke
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2021, 284
  • [7] Further steps in the modeling of behavioural crowd dynamics, good news for safe handling Comment on "Human behaviours in evacuation crowd dynamics: From modelling to "big data" toward crisis management" by Nicola Bellomo et al
    Knopoff, Damian A.
    PHYSICS OF LIFE REVIEWS, 2016, 18 : 35 - +