Sustainability assessment of road pavement designs by integration of LCA and LCCA

被引:3
作者
Khavandi Khiavi, Alireza [1 ]
Molhemazar, Amirhossein [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Zanjan, Dept Civil Engn, Zanjan, Iran
关键词
Sustainability; decision making; LCA; LCCA; pavements; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; ENERGY-CONSUMPTION; REINFORCED-CONCRETE; ASPHALT; MAINTENANCE; CONSTRUCTION; IMPACTS; REHABILITATION; OPTIMIZATION; COST;
D O I
10.1080/10298436.2023.2268802
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
This study aimed to propose a framework for sustainable assessment of pavement by the integration of LCA and LCCA methods. Additionally, a tool was developed that employs a multi-criteria decision-making process to determine the most sustainable pavement design alternative. The developed tool was applied in a case study involving 496 weighing modes to assess the impact of different maintenance intervention levels and the discount and traffic growth rates on the sustainability of design alternatives with varying maintenance treatments. The results of the analysis revealed that asphalt pavement with a stabilised base demonstrated superior sustainability, covering over 87% of the weight modes. Conversely, concrete pavement exhibited lower sustainability, representing only 6.5% of the weight modes. Additionally, among maintenance activities, preventive treatments exhibited heightened sustainability in scenarios with higher discount rates and lower traffic growth. These findings highlighted the importance of selecting the appropriate pavement type for sustainable infrastructure development.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 61 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2012, PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT
[2]  
Ardekani S., 2010, Effect of Pavement Type on Fuel Consumption and Emissions in City Driving, P4
[3]   Putting sustainability theory into roadway design practice: Implementation of LCA and LCCA analysis for pavement type selection in real world decision making [J].
Batouli, Mostafa ;
Bienvenu, Michael ;
Mostafavi, Ali .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART D-TRANSPORT AND ENVIRONMENT, 2017, 52 :289-302
[4]  
Bennett C., 2003, Modeling road user and environmental effects in HDM-4, Version 3.0, international study of highway development and management tools (ISOHDM), V7
[5]   Sustainability Assessment of Transport Infrastructure Projects: A Review of Existing Tools and Methods [J].
Bueno, P. C. ;
Vassallo, J. M. ;
Cheung, K. .
TRANSPORT REVIEWS, 2015, 35 (05) :622-649
[6]   Environmental analysis of different construction techniques and maintenance activities for a typical local road [J].
Celauro, Clara ;
Corriere, Ferdinando ;
Guerrieri, Marco ;
Lo Casto, Barbara ;
Rizzo, Angela .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2017, 142 :3482-3489
[7]  
Chan A.W.-C., 2007, Economic and environmental evaluations of life-cycle cost analysis practice: a case study of Michigan DOT pavement projects
[8]  
Chappat M., 2003, Colas SA, Paris, V9, P1
[9]  
Chehvoits J., 2010, First International Conference on Pavement Preservation, P27
[10]   Explore pavement roughness under various funding for the Taiwan provincial highways using LCCA [J].
Chen, Shih-Huang ;
Ni, Frank Mi-Way .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PAVEMENT ENGINEERING, 2019, 20 (12) :1392-1399