Diverse pathways for climate resilience in marine fishery systems

被引:6
作者
Eurich, Jacob G. [1 ,2 ]
Friedman, Whitney R. [3 ,4 ]
Kleisner, Kristin M. [5 ]
Zhao, Lily Z. [6 ]
Free, Christopher M. [2 ,7 ]
Fletcher, Meghan [7 ,8 ]
Mason, Julia G. [5 ]
Tokunaga, Kanae [9 ]
Aguion, Alba [10 ,11 ]
Dell'Apa, Andrea [12 ]
Dickey-Collas, Mark [13 ,14 ]
Fujita, Rod [15 ]
Golden, Christopher D. [16 ]
Hollowed, Anne B. [17 ]
Ishimura, Gakushi [18 ]
Karr, Kendra A. [15 ,19 ]
Kasperski, Stephen [20 ]
Kisara, Yuga [18 ]
Lau, Jacqueline D. [21 ]
Mangubhai, Sangeeta [22 ]
Osman, Layla [15 ]
Pecl, Gretta T. [23 ,24 ]
Schmidt, Joern O. [13 ,25 ]
Allison, Edward H. [26 ,27 ]
Sullivan, Patrick J. [28 ]
Cinner, Joshua E. [21 ]
Griffis, Roger B. [29 ]
Mcclanahan, Timothy R. [30 ]
Stedman, Richard C. [28 ]
Mills, Katherine E. [9 ]
机构
[1] Environm Def Fund, Santa Barbara, CA 93101 USA
[2] Univ Calif Santa Barbara, Marine Sci Inst, Santa Barbara, CA USA
[3] Univ Calif Santa Barbara, Natl Ctr Ecol Anal & Synth, Santa Barbara, CA USA
[4] Univ Calif Santa Cruz, Environm Studies Dept, Santa Cruz, CA USA
[5] Environm Def Fund, Boston, MA USA
[6] Univ Calif Santa Barbara, Dept Ecol Evolut & Marine Biol, Santa Barbara, CA USA
[7] Univ Calif Santa Barbara, Bren Sch Environm Sci & Management, Santa Barbara, CA USA
[8] Nature Conservancy, San Diego, CA USA
[9] Gulf Maine Res Inst, Portland, ME USA
[10] Duke Univ, Nicholas Sch Environm, Coasts & Commons CoLab, Beaufort, NC USA
[11] CIM Univ Vigo, Future Oceans Lab, Vigo, Spain
[12] Independent Int Consultant, Monrovia, CA USA
[13] Int Council Explorat Sea ICES, Copenhagen, Denmark
[14] Tech Univ Denmark, Natl Inst Aquat Resources, Copenhagen, Denmark
[15] Environm Def Fund, San Francisco, CA USA
[16] Harvard TH Chan Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Nutr, Boston, MA USA
[17] Univ Washington, Sch Fishery & Aquat Sci, Seattle, WA USA
[18] Iwate Univ, Fac Agr, Morioka, Japan
[19] Univ Calif Santa Cruz, Inst Marine Sci, Santa Cruz, CA USA
[20] NOAA, Natl Marine Fisheries Serv, Alaska Fisheries Sci Ctr, Seattle, WA USA
[21] James Cook Univ, Coll Arts Soc & Educ, Townsville, Qld, Australia
[22] Talanoa Consulting, Suva, Fiji
[23] Univ Tasmania, Inst Marine & Antarctic Studies, Hobart, Tas, Australia
[24] Univ Tasmania, Ctr Marine Socioecol, Hobart, Tas, Australia
[25] Christian Albrechts Univ Kiel, Kiel, Germany
[26] WorldFish, Bayan Lepas, Penang, Malaysia
[27] Univ Lancaster, Lancaster Environm Ctr, Lancaster, England
[28] Cornell Univ, Dept Nat Resources & Environm, Ithaca, NY USA
[29] NOAA, Natl Marine Fisheries Serv, Off Sci & Technol, Silver Spring, MD USA
[30] Wildlife Conservat Soc, Global Marine Programs, Bronx, NY USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
adaptive capacity; climate change; coastal communities; fisheries management; global change; social-ecological systems; FISHING COMMUNITIES; VULNERABILITY; ADAPTATION; IMPACTS;
D O I
10.1111/faf.12790
中图分类号
S9 [水产、渔业];
学科分类号
0908 ;
摘要
Both the ecological and social dimensions of fisheries are being affected by climate change. As a result, policymakers, managers, scientists and fishing communities are seeking guidance on how to holistically build resilience to climate change. Numerous studies have highlighted key attributes of resilience in fisheries, yet concrete examples that explicitly link these attributes to social-ecological outcomes are lacking. To better understand climate resilience, we assembled 18 case studies spanning ecological, socio-economic, governance and geographic contexts. Using a novel framework for evaluating 38 resilience attributes, the case studies were systematically assessed to understand how attributes enable or inhibit resilience to a given climate stressor. We found population abundance, learning capacity, and responsive governance were the most important attributes for conferring resilience, with ecosystem connectivity, place attachment, and accountable governance scoring the strongest across the climate-resilient fisheries. We used these responses to develop an attribute typology that describes robust sources of resilience, actionable priority attributes and attributes that are case specific or require research. We identified five fishery archetypes to guide stakeholders as they set long-term goals and prioritize actions to improve resilience. Lastly, we found evidence for two pathways to resilience: (1) building ecological assets and strengthening communities, which we observed in rural and small-scale fisheries, and (2) building economic assets and improving effective governance, which was demonstrated in urban and wealthy fisheries. Our synthesis presents a novel framework that can be directly applied to identify approaches, pathways and actionable levers for improving climate resilience in fishery systems.
引用
收藏
页码:38 / 59
页数:22
相关论文
共 71 条
  • [71] Zinsstag J., 2021, One Health: the theory and practice of integrated health approaches