Separating the General and Content-Specific Components of Self-Reported Propensity for Mind-Wandering

被引:0
作者
Kowalczyk, Marek [1 ]
Klonowska, Magdalena [1 ]
Mikietynska, Agata [1 ]
机构
[1] Adam Mickiewicz Univ, Fac Psychol & Cognit Sci, Poznan, Poland
关键词
mind-wandering; aging; positive affect; negative affect; bifactor model; INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES; NEGATIVE AFFECT; LIFE; MOOD;
D O I
10.1027/1614-0001/a000402
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
People differ in the propensity to mind-wander, that is, the tendency to slip into thinking about something else than the task at hand or the happenings in the immediate environment. Research indicates that mind-wandering tends to be associated with negative emotional states and that it declines with increasing age in adulthood. A question arises whether these relationships are true of mind-wandering in general, independently of its content and affective tone, or just particular kinds of off-task thinking. Participants (N = 218) aged 18-84 years filled out the Task-Unrelated Thoughts Questionnaire (TUTQ), a multidimensional instrument for measuring individual tendencies in mind-wandering, and several scales related to affective functioning. A bifactor model for the TUTQ was employed, encompassing a general factor and three orthogonal specific factors that referred to affectively different modes of off-task thinking. The scores on the general factor decreased with increasing age of the respondents, dispositional positive affect, and satisfaction with life, whereas they increased with increasing negative affect and emotional reactivity. Age and affect-related variables, including individual tendencies in emotion regulation, also predicted, selectively, the specific factors. Although methodologically and theoretically challenging, the bifactor model seems to be a promising tool for representing and exploring individual variability in mind-wandering.
引用
收藏
页码:271 / 278
页数:8
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]   Sample Size Requirements for Bifactor Models [J].
Bader, Martina ;
Jobst, Lisa J. ;
Moshagen, Morten .
STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING-A MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL, 2022, 29 (05) :772-783
[2]   The daydreamer: Exploring the personality underpinnings of daydreaming styles and their implications for well-being [J].
Blouin-Hudon, Eve -Marie C. ;
Zelenski, John M. .
CONSCIOUSNESS AND COGNITION, 2016, 44 :114-129
[3]  
Brzozowski P., 2010, Skala Uczu Pozytywnych i Negatywnych SUPIN. Polska Adaptacja Skali PANAS Davida Watsona i Lee Anny ClarkPodrcznik
[4]   Deliberate and spontaneous mind wandering in Chinese students: Associations with mindfulness, affect, personality, and life satisfaction [J].
Carciofo, Richard ;
Jiang, Peiyuan .
PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2021, 180
[5]   Metacognitive beliefs mediate the relationship between mind wandering and negative affect [J].
Carciofo, Richard ;
Song, Nan ;
Du, Feng ;
Wang, Michelle M. ;
Zhang, Kan .
PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2017, 107 :78-87
[6]   Psychometric Evaluation of Chinese-Language 44-Item and 10-Item Big Five Personality Inventories, Including Correlations with Chronotype, Mindfulness and Mind Wandering [J].
Carciofo, Richard ;
Yang, Jiaoyan ;
Song, Nan ;
Du, Feng ;
Zhang, Kan .
PLOS ONE, 2016, 11 (02)
[7]   The development of the revised version of the Formal Characteristic of Behaviour Temperament Inventory FCB-TI(R) [J].
Cyniak-Cieciura, Maria ;
Zawadzki, Bogdan ;
Strelau, Jan .
PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2018, 127 :117-126
[8]   The ARSQ 2.0 reveals age and personality effects on mind-wandering experiences [J].
Diaz, B. Alexander ;
Van der Sluis, Sophie ;
Benjamins, Jeroen S. ;
Stoffers, Diederick ;
Hardstone, Richard ;
Mansvelder, Huibert D. ;
Van Someren, Eus J. W. ;
Linkenkaer-Hansen, Klaus .
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2014, 5
[9]   THE SATISFACTION WITH LIFE SCALE [J].
DIENER, E ;
EMMONS, RA ;
LARSEN, RJ ;
GRIFFIN, S .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY ASSESSMENT, 1985, 49 (01) :71-75
[10]   Anomalous Results in G-Factor Models: Explanations and Alternatives [J].
Eid, Michael ;
Geiser, Christian ;
Koch, Tobias ;
Heene, Moritz .
PSYCHOLOGICAL METHODS, 2017, 22 (03) :541-562