Failure mode and Effect Analysis of personal fall arrest system under the intuitionistic fuzzy environment

被引:4
作者
Ghasemi, Fakhradin [1 ]
Rahimi, Jamshid [2 ]
机构
[1] Abadan Univ Med Sci, Occupat Hlth & Safety Engn Dept, Abadan, Iran
[2] Alborz Univ Med Sci, Sch Publ Hlth, Occupat Hlth Dept, Alborz, Iran
关键词
Fuzzy sets; Safety analysis; Risk assessment; Accident prevention; SAFETY;
D O I
10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16606
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background and aims: Intuitionistic fuzzy sets (IFS) theory is more powerful than classic fuzzy sets theory in handling uncertainty. A new approach for Failure Mode and Effect Analysis (FMEA) was developed based on IFS and group decision-making (known as IF-FMEA) for investigating Per-sonal Fall Arrest System (PFAS).Method: FMEA parameters, including occurrence, consequence, and detection, were re-defined based on a seven-point linguistic scale. Each linguistic term was associated with an intuition-istic triangular fuzzy set. Opinions on the parameters were gathered from a panel of experts, integrated using the similarity aggregation method, and defuzzified utilizing the center of gravity approach.Results: Nine failure modes were identified and analyzed using both FMEA and IF-FMEA. The risk priority numbers (RPNs) and prioritization obtained from the two approaches were different, highlighting the importance of using IFS. The highest RPN was associated with the lanyard web failure, while the failure of the anchor D-ring had the least RPN. Detection score was higher for metal parts of the PFAS, suggesting that failures in these parts are harder to detect. Conclusion: In addition to being economical in terms of calculations, the proposed method was efficient in handling uncertainty. Different parts of a PFAS create different levels of risk.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]   Human error analysis in furnace start-up operation using HEART under intuitionistic fuzzy environment [J].
Aliabadi, Mostafa Mirzaei .
JOURNAL OF LOSS PREVENTION IN THE PROCESS INDUSTRIES, 2021, 69
[2]   Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA) for wind turbines [J].
Arabian-Hoseynabadi, H. ;
Oraee, H. ;
Tavner, P. J. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ELECTRICAL POWER & ENERGY SYSTEMS, 2010, 32 (07) :817-824
[3]  
Atanassov K., 2016, INT J BIOAUTOMAT, V20, P1
[4]  
Atanassov K., 1983, PROC 7 ITKRS SESS
[5]   Type-1 Fuzzy Sets and Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets † [J].
Atanassov, Krassimir T. .
Algorithms, 2017, 10 (03)
[6]   An integrated approach for fuzzy failure modes and effects analysis using fuzzy AHP and fuzzy MAIRCA [J].
Boral, Soumava ;
Howard, Ian ;
Chaturvedi, Sanjay K. ;
McKee, Kristoffer ;
Naikan, V. N. A. .
ENGINEERING FAILURE ANALYSIS, 2020, 108
[7]  
Burillo P, 1994, P 1 WORKSHOP FUZZY B, P53
[8]  
Galecka C., 2018, PROF SAF, V30, P52
[9]   Applications, Shortcomings, and New Advances of Job Safety Analysis (JS']JSA): Findings from a Systematic Review [J].
Ghasemi, Fakhradin ;
Doosti-Irani, Amin ;
Aghaei, Hamed .
SAFETY AND HEALTH AT WORK, 2023, 14 (02) :153-162
[10]   Human and organizational failures analysis in process industries using FBN-HFACS model: Learning from a toxic gas leakage accident [J].
Ghasemi, Fakhradin ;
Gholamizadeh, Kamran ;
Farjadnia, Amirhasan ;
Sedighizadeh, Alireza ;
Kalatpour, Omid .
JOURNAL OF LOSS PREVENTION IN THE PROCESS INDUSTRIES, 2022, 78