Strategic uses for ancillary bioenergy in a carbon-neutral and fossil-free 2050 European energy system

被引:13
作者
Wu, Fei [1 ,3 ]
Muller, Adrian [2 ]
Pfenninger, Stefan [3 ]
机构
[1] Swiss Fed Inst Technol, Inst Environm Decis, Zurich, Switzerland
[2] Res Inst Organ Agr FiBL, Dept Food Syst Sci, Frick, Switzerland
[3] Delft Univ Technol, Fac Technol Policy & Management TPM, Delft, Netherlands
关键词
sustainable bioenergy; carbon-neutrality; sector-coupling; renewable energy systems optimisation; energy policy; CO2; EMISSIONS;
D O I
10.1088/1748-9326/aca9e1
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Biomass is a growing renewable energy source in Europe and is envisioned to play a role for realising carbon neutrality, predominantly using dedicated energy crops. However, dedicated biomass is controversial for reasons including its competition with food production or its land-use and emissions impacts. Here we examine the potential role of a land-free alternative: ancillary bioenergy (AB) from biomass sources not primarily grown for energy and without land/food/feed competition. We provide the first dataset of 2050 ancillary biomass potential using the agricultural system model SOLm, which encompasses untapped by-/co-products and detailed agricultural residues. Results show that there is a limited future potential for AB in Europe (2394-10 342 PJ, which is 3-6 times lower than other estimates including dedicated biomass). We design and investigate alternative scenarios where this bioenergy resource can be fully utilised, not utilised at all, or utilised optimally by the sector-coupled energy system model Euro-Calliope. We find that fully utilising ancillary biomass can help phase out controversial nuclear or land-intensive dedicated biomass, so might achieve higher societal acceptability. Using all ancillary biomass as a negative-emissions source at stationary bioenergy carbon capture and storage plants in a nuclear-free system provides additional climate benefits. It is also possible to leave the AB potential completely unused, which barely increases total system cost, but would preserve agricultural nutrients. We conclude that there are synergies and trade-offs among possible strategic uses of AB, which can provide guidelines for a more coherent European bioenergy strategy. Although the 2050 potential of AB is limited, our findings suggest that it could fill critical strategic niches for realising carbon-neutrality.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 42 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2018, OFFICIAL J EUROPEAN, VL328, P82
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2016, IEA World Energy Statistics and Balances, DOI [DOI 10.1787/OIL-DATA-EN, 10.1787/enestats-data-en, DOI 10.1787/ENESTATS-DATA-EN]
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2021, Directorate-General for Communication, European green deal-Delivering on our targets, DOI DOI 10.2775/373022
  • [4] [Anonymous], 1998, DIRECTIVE 98/70/EC OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 13 October 1998 relating to the quality of petrol and diesel fuels and amending Council Directive 93/12/EEC
  • [5] Radical transformation pathway towards sustainable electricity via evolutionary steps
    Bogdanov, Dmitrii
    Farfan, Javier
    Sadovskaia, Kristina
    Aghahosseini, Arman
    Child, Michael
    Gulagi, Ashish
    Oyewo, Ayobami Solomon
    Noel Simas Barbosa, Larissa de Souza
    Breyer, Christian
    [J]. NATURE COMMUNICATIONS, 2019, 10 (1)
  • [6] Bryn P., 2022, NATL DATA FILES PREB
  • [7] 2022, [No title captured]
  • [8] Promotion of biofuel consumption in the transport sector: An EU-27 perspective
    Cansino, J. M.
    Pablo-Romero, M. del P.
    Roman, R.
    Yniguez, R.
    [J]. RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2012, 16 (08) : 6013 - 6021
  • [9] The role of bioenergy in a fully sustainable global energy system
    Cornelissen, Stijn
    Koper, Michele
    Deng, Yvonne Y.
    [J]. BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2012, 41 : 21 - 33
  • [10] Projections of the availability and cost of residues from agriculture and forestry
    Daioglou, Vassilis
    Stehfest, Elke
    Wicke, Birka
    Faaij, Andre
    van Vuuren, Detlef P.
    [J]. GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY BIOENERGY, 2016, 8 (02): : 456 - 470