British imbalance market paradox: Variable renewable energy penetration in energy markets

被引:3
作者
Atherton, John [1 ,2 ]
Hofmeister, Markus [1 ,2 ]
Mosbach, Sebastian [1 ,2 ]
Akroyd, Jethro [1 ,2 ]
Farazi, Feroz [1 ]
Kraft, Markus [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cambridge, Dept Chem Engn & Biotechnol, West Cambridge Site,Philippa Fawcett Dr, Cambridge CB3 0AS, England
[2] Cambridge Ctr Adv Res & Educ Singapore, CARES, 1 Create Way,05-05 CREATE Tower, Singapore 138602, Singapore
[3] Nanyang Technol Univ, Sch Chem & Biomed Engn, 62 Nanyang Dr, Singapore 637459, Singapore
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会; 英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
Energy; Market; VRE; Britain; Germany; Electricity; ELECTRICITY PRICES; SOLAR POWER; BALANCING POWER; WIND POWER; INTEGRATION; IMPACTS; GENERATION; FLEXIBILITY; CURTAILMENT; GERMANY;
D O I
10.1016/j.rser.2023.113591
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The expansion of variable renewable energy (VRE) generation propagates numerous challenges for national energy systems. Despite recent years of VRE expansion and declining coal utilisation in the overall market profile, coal energy generation has maintained and grown its position as a marginal seller in the imbalance market. Coal's disproportionate resurgence as a bidder of later resort in the imbalance market also represents a shift in its bidding behaviour. A comparative breakdown of Britain's overall market with that of Germany, followed by a specific investigation of Britain's imbalance market provides insight into changing roles of VRE, fossil fuelled energy, and compensation technologies. Historically, VRE trends in the British and German markets have been broadly consistent. Recently, increasing distress in Britain's overall market is found to result in the increased use of high pollution technologies to meet imbalances. As a result, the composition of the overall and imbalance markets have increasingly diverged, and although the dominance of gas in the latter is expected, the resurgence of coal energy is more remarkable. Thus, while the proportion of generation by renewables has continued to increase, fossil fuelled (notably including coal) capacity, and its associated infrastructure costs and influence as the price setting marginal seller, remains dominant in the imbalance market.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 107 条
[1]   The merit order effect of wind and river type hydroelectricity generation on Turkish electricity prices [J].
Acar, Berkan ;
Selcuk, Orhun ;
Dastan, Seyit Ali .
ENERGY POLICY, 2019, 132 :1298-1319
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2020, Digest of UK Energy Statistics (DUKES): electricity
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2005, Applied Mathematical Finance, DOI DOI 10.1080/13504860500117503
[4]   Effects of large scale penetration of renewables: The Italian case in the years 2008-2015 [J].
Antonelli, Marco ;
Desideri, Umberto ;
Franco, Alessandro .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2018, 81 :3090-3100
[5]  
Appunn Kerstine, 2021, Clean Energy Wire
[6]   Negative market prices on power exchanges: Evidence and policy implications from Germany [J].
Aust, Benjamin ;
Horsch, Andreas .
Electricity Journal, 2020, 33 (03)
[7]   Effects of renewables on the stylized facts of electricity prices [J].
Ballester, Cristina ;
Furio, Dolores .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2015, 52 :1596-1609
[8]   Adiabatic compressed air energy storage technology [J].
Barbour, Edward ;
Pottie, Daniel L. .
JOULE, 2021, 5 (08) :1914-1920
[9]  
BDEW, 2022, The energy supply 2021 - updated annual report
[10]  
BEIS, 2022, EEP - Annex J - Total electricity generation by source, All Power Producers' (APP)