Abandoned mine land program: Examining public participation in decision-making(sic)(sic)(sic)Palabras clave

被引:4
作者
Kendrick, Karsyn [1 ]
Kim, Younsung [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] George Mason Univ, Dept Environm Sci & Policy, Fairfax, VA USA
[2] George Mason Univ, Dept Environm Sci & Policy, 4400 Univ Dr, MSN 5F2, DK 3020, Fairfax, VA 22030 USA
关键词
abandoned mine land program; contaminated communities; land reclamation; public participation; successful public participation; CITIZEN PARTICIPATION; ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE; INVOLVEMENT; NONPROFITS; POLICY;
D O I
10.1111/ropr.12569
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
For centuries, coal extraction and production provided low-cost energy that powered the American economy. Currently, an estimated 5.5 million people in the Appalachian region live within one mile of an Abandoned Mine Land (AML) site. The site remediation has been funded and promoted by the AML program under the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act (SMCRA) of 1977, and public engagement has been required. However, little is known about the AML program and the public engagement requirement for site remediation decision-making. Relying on State and Tribal Reclamation Plans and community surveys, we investigate how AML states and tribes engage the public and which barriers limit successful participation in the AML program. We found that AML states and tribes rely heavily on traditional methods of public engagement, such as public meetings, hearings, and comment periods, rather than nontraditional methods that could include more diverse stakeholders. We also found (1) lack of information on public participation opportunities and (2) unclear project selection and awards processes as key barriers limiting public engagement. Three recommendations specific to AML program are suggested.
引用
收藏
页码:629 / 657
页数:29
相关论文
共 62 条
[11]   Rethinking remediation: mine reclamation, environmental justice, and relations of care [J].
Beckett, Caitlynn ;
Keeling, Arn .
LOCAL ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 24 (03) :216-230
[12]  
Beierle T., 1998, 9906 RES FUT
[13]  
Beierle T.C., 1999, Policy Studies Review, V16, P75, DOI [DOI 10.1111/J.1541-1338.1999.TB00879.X, DOI 10.1111/j.1541-1338.1999.tb00879.x]
[14]  
Beierle TC, 2000, J POLICY ANAL MANAG, V19, P587, DOI 10.1002/1520-6688(200023)19:4<587::AID-PAM4>3.0.CO
[15]  
2-Q
[16]  
Bellamy J., 1999, IMPLEMENTING ICM EVA
[17]   PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT IN RESOURCE PLANNING - TOWARD BRIDGING THE GAP BETWEEN POLICY AND IMPLEMENTATION [J].
BLAHNA, DJ ;
YONTSSHEPARD, S .
SOCIETY & NATURAL RESOURCES, 1989, 2 (03) :209-227
[18]   Designing effective public participation [J].
Bobbio, Luigi .
POLICY AND SOCIETY, 2019, 38 (01) :41-57
[19]   An evaluation of public participation information for land use decisions: public comment, surveys, and participatory mapping [J].
Brown, Greg ;
Eckold, Henry .
LOCAL ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 25 (02) :85-100
[20]  
Charleston Field Office, 2015, ANN EV REP REG AB MI