Temporal Resolution and Speech Recognition in Noise in Adults with Hearing Aid

被引:0
作者
Gumus, Birgul [1 ]
Derinsu, Ufuk [2 ]
机构
[1] Eskisehir Osmangazi Univ, Sch Med, Dept Otorhinolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Eskisehir, Turkiye
[2] Marmara Univ, Sch Med, Dept Otorhinolaryngol Head & Neck Surg Audiol, Istanbul, Turkiye
关键词
Speech intelligibility; hearing aid; temporal resolution; Gap in Noise test; Matrix Sentence test; GAP DURATION DISCRIMINATION; HEMISPHERIC ASYMMETRIES; AGE; LISTENERS; PERFORMANCE; CAPACITY;
D O I
10.5152/B-ENT.2022.21658
中图分类号
R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100213 ;
摘要
Objective: The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of unilateral and bilateral hearing aid use on temporal resolution and speech recognition in noisy environments. Methods: The Gaps in Noise test and the Turkish Matrix Sentence Test were used to evaluate 60 participants with sensorineural hearing loss who were classified as bilateral hearing aid users, unilateral hearing aid users, and those not using a hearing aid. The tests were conducted with and without the use of hearing aids. Results: Although the values were within normal limits, different results were obtained from the Gaps in Noise test indices. Bilateral or unilateral use of hearing aids had no effect on the approximate Gaps in Noise test threshold; however, the percentage of correct responses was lower in the unilateral hearing aid group than in the bilateral hearing aid group. In the unilateral group, both the approximate threshold and the percentage of correct responses obtained from the right ear without hearing aids were low. Additionally, Turkish Matrix Sentence Test score was better in the users of bilateral hearing aids. Conclusion: While wearing bilateral hearing aids improves speech recognition in noisy environments, the effect on the Gaps in Noise test is unclear. The mild-to-moderate sensorineural hearing loss did not affect the temporal resolution. The use of a unilateral hearing aid had an effect on the percentage of correct responses in the Gaps in Noise test but had no effect on the approximate threshold. Even when a monaural hearing aid is used in the right ear of a person with bilateral hearing loss, the asymmetrical stimulation has an effect on the temporal resolution obtained in the right ear.
引用
收藏
页码:18 / 23
页数:6
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   The Effects of Hearing Aid Digital Noise Reduction and Directionality on Acceptable Noise Level [J].
Ahmadi, Roghayeh ;
Jalilvand, Hamid ;
Mahdavi, Mohammad Ebrahim ;
Ahmadi, Fatemeh ;
Baghban, Ali Reza Akbarzade .
CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY, 2018, 11 (04) :267-274
[2]   Hemispheric asymmetries for the temporal resolution of brief auditory stimuli [J].
Brown, S ;
Nicholls, MER .
PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 1997, 59 (03) :442-447
[3]   Acoustic stimulation effect on temporal processing skills in elderly subjects before and after hearing aid fitting [J].
Canina Pinheiro, Maria Madalena ;
Dias, Karin Ziliotto ;
Pereira, Liliane Desgualdo .
BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY, 2012, 78 (04) :9-16
[4]   Temporal Processing and Speech Perception Performance in Postlingual Adult Users of Cochlear Implants [J].
Cesur, Sidika ;
Derinsu, Ufuk .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF AUDIOLOGY, 2020, 31 (02) :129-136
[5]  
Chermak Gail D, 2005, J Am Acad Audiol, V16, P554, DOI 10.3766/jaaa.16.8.4
[6]  
Derleth Peter, 2021, Seminars in Hearing, V42, P206, DOI 10.1055/s-0041-1735176
[7]   AGE EFFECTS ON MEASURES OF AUDITORY DURATION DISCRIMINATION [J].
FITZGIBBONS, PJ ;
GORDONSALANT, S .
JOURNAL OF SPEECH AND HEARING RESEARCH, 1994, 37 (03) :662-670
[8]  
Fortes Ana Beatriz, 2007, Pró-Fono R. Atual. Cient., V19, P87
[9]   Auditory temporal processing and aging: implications for speech understanding of older people [J].
Gordon-Salant, S. ;
Fitzgibbons, P. J. ;
Yeni-Komshian, G. H. .
AUDIOLOGY RESEARCH, 2011, 1 (01) :9-15
[10]   Gap duration discrimination in listeners with cochlear hearing loss: Effects of gap and marker duration, frequency separation, and mode of presentation [J].
Grose, JH ;
Hall, JW ;
Buss, E .
JARO-JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR RESEARCH IN OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 2001, 2 (04) :388-398