Associations between aided speech audiometry and subjective assessment of hearing aid outcomes

被引:5
作者
Ahn, Jungmin [1 ]
Lim, Jihyun [2 ]
Kang, Minwoong [2 ]
Cho, Yang-Sun [3 ]
机构
[1] Korea Canc Ctr Hosp, Dept Otorhinolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Samsung Med Ctr, Ctr Clin Epidemiol, Seoul, South Korea
[3] Sungkyunkwan Univ, Samsung Med Ctr, Dept Otorhinolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Sch Med, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
Hearing aids; hearing aid satisfaction; speech perception; ageing; IN-NOISE TEST; OLDER-ADULTS; RECEPTION THRESHOLDS; HELP-SEEKING; PREVALENCE; HANDICAP;
D O I
10.1080/14992027.2022.2106451
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
Objective This study aimed to analyse outcomes with hearing aid (HA) use and to determine whether common audiological tests, including pure-tone audiometry or word recognition test, correlate with HA wearers' subjective benefit. Design A retrospective chart review. Study sample A total of 129 patients who adopted new HAs between January 2011 and December 2018 were enrolled. Outcome measures including pure tone thresholds, word recognition score (WRS), and self-reported questionnaires were obtained 1, 4, and 12 months post fit. Results The mean aided threshold and WRS at each post-fit visit significantly improved from the unaided condition. Self-reported outcomes confirmed by the Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly (HHIE) scores significantly improved compared to the unaided condition at 1- and 4-month follow-up. Results of the regression analysis indicated that the aided WRS score is a significant factor at all post-fit visits that explains less than 10% of the variance in HHIE scores. Conclusions Aided WRS is the factor most associated with subjectively reported HA outcomes, both in the short- and long term. Therefore, aided WRS should be considered as a useful tool for evaluating HA benefits, even after the prolonged use of HAs.
引用
收藏
页码:955 / 963
页数:9
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]  
American National Standards Institute (ANSI), 2010, S3.6-2010: Specification foraudiometers
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1998, AM J AUDIOL, V7, P5, DOI [DOI 10.1044/1059-0889.0701.05, 10.1044/1059-0889.0701.05]
[3]   Prediction of IOI-HA Scores Using Speech Reception Thresholds and Speech Discrimination Scores in Quiet [J].
Brannstrom, K. Jonas ;
Lantz, Johannes ;
Nielsen, Lars Holme ;
Olsen, Steen Ostergaard .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF AUDIOLOGY, 2014, 25 (02) :154-163
[4]  
Bridges J., 1998, HEARING J, V51, P39, DOI DOI 10.1097/00025572-199807000-00002
[5]  
추호석, 2012, [Korean Journal of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, 대한이비인후과학회지 두경부외과학], V55, P20
[6]  
CATLIN FI, 1979, OTOLARYNG CLIN N AM, V12, P655
[7]   Factors associated with self-reported outcome in adaptation of hearing aid [J].
Chang, Young-Soo ;
Choi, Jeesun ;
Moon, Il Joon ;
Hong, Sung Hwa ;
Chung, Won-Ho ;
Cho, Yang-Sun .
ACTA OTO-LARYNGOLOGICA, 2016, 136 (09) :905-911
[8]   Prevalence of Hearing Aid Use Among Older Adults in the United States [J].
Chien, Wade ;
Lin, Frank R. .
ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2012, 172 (03) :292-293
[9]  
Cho S.-J., 2008, AUDIOLOGY, V4, P28, DOI 10.21848/audiol.2008.4.1.28
[10]  
박시내, 2011, [Korean Journal of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, 대한이비인후과학회지 두경부외과학], V54, P828