An assessment of the environmental sustainability of beef production in Canada

被引:3
作者
Aboagye, Isaac A. [1 ,2 ]
Valappil, Gayathri [3 ]
Dutta, Baishali [3 ]
Imbeault-Tetreault, Hugues [3 ]
Ominski, Kim H. [1 ,2 ]
Cordeiro, Marcos R. C. [1 ,2 ]
Krobel, Roland [4 ]
Pogue, Sarah J. [4 ]
McAllister, Tim A. [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Manitoba, Dept Anim Sci, Winnipeg, MB R3T 2N2, Canada
[2] Natl Ctr Livestock & Environm, Winnipeg, MB R3T 2N2, Canada
[3] Grp AGECO, Montreal, PQ H2S 1B1, Canada
[4] Agr & Agri Food Canada, Agr & Agrifood Canada, Lethbridge, AB T1J 4B1, Canada
关键词
Key words: beef value chain; carbon footprint; energy use; land use; life cycle assessment; water use; tors: GHG emissions; fossil energy use; blue water use (irri-; GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS; PRODUCTION SYSTEMS; AMMONIA EMISSIONS; DAIRY; NITROGEN; CATTLE; IMPACTS;
D O I
10.1139/cjas-2023-0077
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
This study assessed the environmental impacts of beef cattle production and their effects on the overall sustainability of Canadian beef production. Cradle to farm gate, cradle to processor's gate, and cradle to consumer plate life cycle assessments were carried out to quantify greenhouse gases (GHG), resource use (i.e., water, land, and fuel), and potential water and air pollution (i.e., freshwater eutrophication, terrestrial acidification, and photochemical oxidants formation). Across the production chain, feed production had the greatest impact on most environmental indicators. The GHG intensity without dairy meat was estimated as 10.4 kg CO2-eq per kg of live weight (LW), corresponding to 32.8 kg CO2-eq per kg of consumed boneless beef. Including dairy meat reduced GHG intensity by 5.8% (0.6 kg CO2-eq kg LW-1) compared to when it was excluded. Other environmental metrics per kg of LW were 657 L, 38.7 m(2) annual crop-eq, 0.4 kg oil-eq, 2.6 kg P-eq, 115.9 kg SO2-eq, and 8.7 kg NOx-eq for water use, land use, fossil fuel use, freshwater eutrophication, terrestrial acidification, and photochemical oxidants, respectively. Data provide benchmarks for use in future regional and national assessments that are designed to encourage the adoption of sustainable management practices that can lower the environmental footprint of Canadian beef production.
引用
收藏
页码:221 / 240
页数:20
相关论文
共 74 条
[1]   Environmental performance of commercial beef production systems utilizing conventional productivity-enhancing technologies [J].
Aboagye, Isaac A. ;
Cordeiro, Marcos R. C. ;
McAllister, Tim A. ;
May, Matt L. ;
Hannon, Sherry J. ;
Booker, Calvin W. ;
Parr, Sandi L. ;
Schunicht, Oliver C. ;
Burciaga-Robles, Luis O. ;
Grimson, Tracey M. ;
Boonstra, Emily ;
Mengistu, Genet F. ;
Fulawka, Deanne L. ;
Ominski, Kim H. .
TRANSLATIONAL ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2022, 6 (03)
[2]   Productivity-Enhancing Technologies. Can Consumer Choices Affect the Environmental Footprint of Beef? [J].
Aboagye, Isaac A. ;
Cordeiro, Marcos R. C. ;
McAllister, Tim A. ;
Ominski, Kim H. .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (08)
[3]  
Agriculture Marketing Guide, 2021, UNDERSTANDING DRESSI
[4]  
Alberta Agriculture and Rural Development (AARD), 2010, EVALUATING ENV EC IM
[5]   Predicting dry matter intake by growing and finishing beef cattle: Evaluation of current methods and equation development [J].
Anele, U. Y. ;
Domby, E. M. ;
Galyean, M. L. .
JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2014, 92 (06) :2660-2667
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2022, Table 32-10-0359-01 Estimated areas, yield, production, average farm price and total farm value of principal field crops, in metric and imperial units, DOI DOI 10.25318/3210035901-ENG
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2014, 14046 ISO
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2013, Air pollutant emission inventory guidebook 2013
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2000, NUTR REQ BEEF CATTL, VSeventh, DOI DOI 10.17226/9791
[10]  
[Anonymous], 2021, Catalogue No En81-4E-PDF