Live load effects in hammer-head piers of continuous highway bridges and design equations based on numerical simulations verified by field tests

被引:2
作者
Demir, Cagri [1 ]
Dicleli, Murat [1 ]
机构
[1] METU, Dept Engn Sci, Ankara, Turkiye
关键词
Hammer -head pier; Live load distribution; Pier design; Finite element model;
D O I
10.1016/j.engstruct.2023.115614
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
In this study, design equations are proposed to calculate the internal forces in hammer-head bridge pier components under the effect of live loads. For this purpose, first, the finite element model (FEM) of an existing bridge is built and the modeling approach is verified against field test results. Next, a four-span benchmark bridge representative of the bridges in the US is selected. FEM of the benchmark bridge is built, and sensitivity analyses are performed on the bridge model to identify the bridge parameters affecting the magnitude and distribution of the girder live load support reactions and hence the internal forces in the hammer-head pier components. The sensitivity analyses revealed that the number of girders, girder spacing, girder type, slab thickness and the overhang distance significantly affect the magnitude and distribution of the girder live load support reactions and hence the forces in hammer-head pier components. Then, parametric analyses of bridges are performed based on the sensitivity analyses results where each parameter is assigned a wide range of values. Subsequently, minimum least squares regression analyses of more than 50,000 data are performed to obtain equations to estimate the maximum cap beam moment and shear force, the maximum column moment and accompanying axial load as well as the maximum column axial load and accompanying moment. The hammer-head pier forces calculated using the design equations are shown to be in reasonably good agreement with FEM analyses results.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]  
AASHTO, 2017, AASHTO LRFD bridge design specifications
[2]  
Barr P.J., 2001, ASCE J STRUCTURAL EN, P298, DOI DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2001)6:5(298)
[3]  
Barr PJ, 2000, LIVE LOAD DISTRIBUTI
[4]   Discussion on AASHTO LRFD Load Distribution Factors for Slab-on-Girder Bridges [J].
Cai, C. S. .
PRACTICE PERIODICAL ON STRUCTURAL DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION, 2005, 10 (03) :171-176
[5]   Non-destructive testing of field bridges in Florida [J].
Cai, CS ;
Shahawy, M ;
El-Saad, A .
STRUCTURAL MATERIALS TECHNOLOGY III: AN NDT CONFERENCE, 1998, 3400 :19-30
[6]   Development of Live Load Distribution Factor Equation for Concrete Multicell Box-Girder Bridges under Vehicle Loading [J].
Choi, Won ;
Mohseni, Iman ;
Park, Jongsup ;
Kang, Junsuk .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CONCRETE STRUCTURES AND MATERIALS, 2019, 13 (01)
[7]  
Demir C, THESIS MIDDLE E TU
[8]   Live Load Distribution Formulas for Single-Span Prestressed Concrete Integral Abutment Bridge Girders [J].
Dicleli, Murat ;
Erhan, Semih .
JOURNAL OF BRIDGE ENGINEERING, 2009, 14 (06) :472-486
[9]   Bridge Load Testing for Identifying Live Load Distribution, Load Rating, Serviceability and Dynamic Response [J].
Dong, Chuanzhi ;
Bas, Selcuk ;
Debees, Marwan ;
Alver, Ninel ;
Catbas, F. Necati .
FRONTIERS IN BUILT ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 6
[10]  
Eom J., 2001, ASCE J BRIDGE ENG, P489, DOI [10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2001)6:6(489), DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2001)6:6(489)]