Performance evaluation of CNN-based crack detection for electrical discharge machined steel surfaces

被引:7
作者
Lakshmi, M. [1 ]
Das, Raja [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Vellore Inst Technol VIT, Sch Adv Sci, Dept Math, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India
[2] Vellore Inst Technol VIT, Sch Adv Sci, Dept Math, Vellore 632014, Tamil Nadu, India
关键词
EDM; CNN; crack detection; machine learning; deep learning; confusion; MATERIAL REMOVAL RATE; NEURAL-NETWORK; PREDICTION; SEGMENTATION;
D O I
10.1177/09544089221146464
中图分类号
TH [机械、仪表工业];
学科分类号
0802 ;
摘要
Electrical discharge machining (EDM) is a non-traditional machining technique that is frequently employed on hard materials. In today's industrial practice, it has been the most prevalent non-traditional material removal procedure. It allows you to process challenging materials and construct complicated forms with excellent accuracy. In the context of image pre-processing approaches to discover defective or non-defective machining pieces through EDM, the Centre of attention of this article is utilizing convolutional neural networks (CNN) to create a machinery piece defective detection approach. A total of 180 datasets of varying sizes produced from public datasets, the proposed CNN model is assessed and compared to pre-trained networks, namely the VGG-16, VGG-19, ResNet-50, and ResNet-101 models. The assessment took into crack detection outcomes, and classification parameters such as accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score. Also, we have given the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, precision-recall curve, and confusion matrices for each model for the required classification to predict the defective cracks, and also, we included the histograms to find the probabilities of defective and non-defective cracks. The suggested model can discriminate between pictures that are cracked and those that are not. According to the findings, VGG-16 has the best accuracy out of all of these models. In comparison to prior conventional procedures, the proposed EDM crack defective detecting methodology gives great accuracy.VGG-16 attains 93% accuracy, 93% of F1-score, 94% of precision, 93% of recall, 93% of specificity, as well as 97% of AUC, testing findings suggest that our strategy is capable of incredible performances.
引用
收藏
页码:738 / 751
页数:14
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]   Analysis of edge-detection techniques for crack identification in bridges [J].
Abdel-Qader, L ;
Abudayyeh, O ;
Kelly, ME .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTING IN CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2003, 17 (04) :255-263
[2]   Performance Evaluation of Deep CNN-Based Crack Detection and Localization Techniques for Concrete Structures [J].
Ali, Luqman ;
Alnajjar, Fady ;
Al Jassmi, Hamad ;
Gocho, Munkhjargal ;
Khan, Wasif ;
Serhani, M. Adel .
SENSORS, 2021, 21 (05) :1-22
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2011, P 28 ISARC 2011, DOI [10.22260/isarc2011/0279, DOI 10.22260/ISARC2011/0279]
[4]  
[Anonymous], Severstal: Steel Defect Detection
[5]   Deep Learning, Feature Learning, and Clustering Analysis for SEM Image Classification [J].
Aversa, Rossella ;
Coronica, Piero ;
De Nobili, Cristiano ;
Cozzini, Stefano .
DATA INTELLIGENCE, 2020, 2 (04) :513-528
[6]   SegNet: A Deep Convolutional Encoder-Decoder Architecture for Image Segmentation [J].
Badrinarayanan, Vijay ;
Kendall, Alex ;
Cipolla, Roberto .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON PATTERN ANALYSIS AND MACHINE INTELLIGENCE, 2017, 39 (12) :2481-2495
[7]  
Chambon Sylvie, 2009, Proceedings of the SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering, V7251, DOI 10.1117/12.805437
[8]   Automatic Road Pavement Assessment with Image Processing: Review and Comparison [J].
Chambon, Sylvie ;
Moliard, Jean-Marc .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICS, 2011, 2011
[9]   NB-CNN: Deep Learning-Based Crack Detection Using Convolutional Neural Network and Naive Bayes Data Fusion [J].
Chen, Fu-Chen ;
Jahanshahi, Mohammad R. .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRIAL ELECTRONICS, 2018, 65 (05) :4392-4400
[10]  
Cun, 2021, PROCEEDINGSNEURIPSCC, P396