Prior Cesarean Birth and Risk of Uterine Rupture in Second-Trimester Medication Abortions Using Mifepristone and Misoprostol

被引:4
作者
Henkel, Andrea
Miller, Hayley E.
Zhang, Jiaqi
Lyell, Deirdre J.
Shaw, Kate A.
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Div Family Planning Serv & Res, Sch Med, Stanford, CA USA
[2] Stanford Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Maternal Fetal Med, Sch Med, Stanford, CA USA
关键词
2ND TRIMESTER ABORTION; LABOR INDUCTION; TERMINATION; PREGNANCY; INTERVALS; EVACUATION; DELIVERY; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1097/AOG.0000000000005259
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Uterine rupture during second-trimester induction abortion using mifepristone and misoprostol is a rare event, but the risk does appear to increase in individuals with prior cesarean birth. OBJECTIVE:To assess the risk difference of uterine rupture when using current mifepristone and misoprostol regimens for second-trimester abortion among individuals with prior cesarean birth compared with those without prior cesarean birth.DATA SOURCES:We searched the terms second trimester, induction, mifepristone, and abortion in PubMed, EMBASE, POPLINE, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Cochrane Library from inception until December 2022.METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION:We included randomized trials and observational studies including a mixed cohort, with and without uterine scar, of individuals at 14-28 weeks of gestation who used mifepristone and misoprostol to end a pregnancy or to manage a fetal death. We excluded case reports, narrative reviews, and studies not published in English. Two reviewers independently screened studies.TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS:Absolute risks with binomial CIs were calculated from pooled data. Using R software, we estimated total risk difference by the Mantel-Haenszel random-effects method without continuity correction. For studies with zero events, a continuity correction of 0.5 was applied for individual risk differences and plotted graphically with forest plots. Statistical heterogeneity was assessed with Higgins I2 statistics. Funnel plot assessed for publication bias. Of 198 articles identified, 22 met the inclusion criteria: seven randomized trials (n=923) and 15 observational studies (n=6,195). Uterine rupture risk with prior cesarean birth was 1.1% (10/874) (95% CI 0.6-2.1) and without prior cesarean birth was 0.01% (2/6,244) (95% CI 0.0-0.12). The risk difference was 1.23% (95% CI 0.46-2.00, I2=0%). Of the 12 reported uterine ruptures, three resulted in hysterectomy.CONCLUSION:Uterine rupture with mifepristone and misoprostol use during second-trimester induction abortion is rare, with the risk increased to 1% in individuals with prior cesarean birth.SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION:PROSPERO, CRD42022302626.
引用
收藏
页码:1357 / 1364
页数:8
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]   Pretreatment With Mifepristone Compared With Misoprostol Alone for Delivery After Fetal Death Between 14 and 28 Weeks of Gestation A Randomized Controlled Trial [J].
Allanson, Emma R. ;
Copson, Sean ;
Spilsbury, Katrina ;
Criddle, Sonya ;
Jennings, Belinda ;
Doherty, Dorota A. ;
Wong, Antonia M. ;
Dickinson, Jan E. .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2021, 137 (05) :801-809
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2019, Obstet Gynecol, V133, pe110, DOI 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003078
[3]  
[Anonymous], Medical Management of Abortion 2018
[4]   Misoprostol for second trimester pregnancy termination in women with prior caesarean: a systematic review [J].
Berghella, V. ;
Airoldi, J. ;
O'Neill, A. M. ;
Einhorn, K. ;
Hoffman, M. .
BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2009, 116 (09) :1151-1157
[5]   Labor induction abortion in the second trimester [J].
Borgatta, Lynn ;
Kapp, Nathalie .
CONTRACEPTION, 2011, 84 (01) :4-18
[6]   Comparison of two dose regimens of misoprostol for second-trimester pregnancy termination [J].
Brouns, Joseph Franciscus Gertrudis Maria ;
van Wely, Madelon ;
Burger, Mattheus Petrus Maria ;
van Wijngaarden, Willem Jacobus .
CONTRACEPTION, 2010, 82 (03) :266-275
[7]   Late second-trimester abortions induced with mifepristone, misoprostol and oxytocin:: a report of 428 consecutive cases [J].
Carbonell Esteve, Josep Lluis ;
Garcia Gallego, Francisca ;
Perez Llorente, Margardell ;
Barambio Bermudez, Santiago ;
Sanchez Sala, Eugenia ;
Varela Gonzalez, Lidia ;
Sanchez Texido, Carlos .
CONTRACEPTION, 2008, 78 (01) :52-60
[8]   Second trimester abortion in women with and without previous uterine scar: Eleven years experience from a developing country [J].
Choudhary, Neelam ;
Bagga, Rashmi ;
Raveendran, Ainharan ;
Saha, Subhas Chandra ;
Dhaliwal, Lakhbir Kaur .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CONTRACEPTION AND REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH CARE, 2011, 16 (05) :378-386
[9]  
Deeks JJ., 2019, Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions, P241, DOI 10.1002/9781119536604
[10]   Mifepristone and Oral, Vaginal, or Sublingual Misoprostol for Second-Trimester Abortion A Randomized Controlled Trial [J].
Dickinson, Jan E. ;
Jennings, Belinda G. ;
Doherty, Dorota A. .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2014, 123 (06) :1162-1168