A novel transformer-based multi-variable multi-step prediction method for chemical process fault prognosis

被引:42
作者
Bai, Yiming [1 ]
Zhao, Jinsong [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Tsinghua Univ, Dept Chem Engn, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China
[2] Tsinghua Univ, Beijing Key Lab Ind Big Data Syst & Applicat, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Fault prognosis; Prediction method; Chemical process; Transformer; Multi -variable prediction; Multi -step prediction; MODEL; SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.1016/j.psep.2022.11.062
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
As the digitalization of process industry deepens, process fault detection and diagnosis (FDD) is an essential tool to ensure safe production in chemical industries. However, FDD may have a long detection delay for some chemical faults. Process fault prognosis methods could predict the occurrence of faults in advance, which would give operators more time and reduce the impact of faults. Nevertheless, many fault prognosis methods still suffer from fixed or insufficient prediction time ahead, which greatly confines their usage in critical scenarios. In this paper, we propose a novel Transformer-based multi-variable multi-step (TMM) prediction method for chemical process fault prognosis. Specifically, Transformer models are trained to predict the change of process variables at the next step, and iterative forecasting is used to predict multi-step changes of process variables. Finally, extensive evaluation of applications in a continuous stirred tank heater (CSTH) system and the Tennessee Eastman process (TEP) demonstrates that the proposed TMM prediction method shows high prediction accuracy and early fault prognosis, compared with representative statistical methods and other advanced deep learning methods.
引用
收藏
页码:937 / 947
页数:11
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]  
Ahmed S, 2023, Arxiv, DOI [arXiv:2205.01138, DOI 10.1007/S00034-023-02454-8]
[2]   A data-driven Bayesian network learning method for process fault diagnosis [J].
Amin, Md Tanjin ;
Khan, Faisal ;
Ahmed, Salim ;
Imtiaz, Syed .
PROCESS SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, 2021, 150 :110-122
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1997, J FORECASTING, DOI [10.1002/(SICI)1099-131X(199705)16:3%3C147::AID-FOR652%3E3.0.CO
[4]  
2-X, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1099-131X(199705)16:3%3C147::AID-FOR652%3E3.0.CO
[5]  
2-X]
[6]   A deep learning model for process fault prognosis [J].
Arunthavanathan, Rajeevan ;
Khan, Faisal ;
Ahmed, Salim ;
Imtiaz, Syed .
PROCESS SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, 2021, 154 :467-479
[7]  
Bai Y., 2022, Methods in Chemical Process Safety, DOI DOI 10.1016/BS.MCPS.2022.04.002
[8]   Revision of the Tennessee Eastman Process Model [J].
Bathelt, Andreas ;
Ricker, N. Lawrence ;
Jelali, Mohieddine .
IFAC PAPERSONLINE, 2015, 48 (08) :309-314
[9]   OASIS-P: Operable Adaptive Sparse Identification of Systems for fault Prognosis of chemical processes [J].
Bhadriraju, Bhavana ;
Kwon, Joseph Sang-Il ;
Khan, Faisal .
JOURNAL OF PROCESS CONTROL, 2021, 107 :114-126
[10]   Risk-based fault prediction of chemical processes using operable adaptive sparse identification of systems (OASIS) [J].
Bhadriraju, Bhavana ;
Sang-Il Kwon, Joseph ;
Khan, Faisal .
COMPUTERS & CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2021, 152