Paths leading contractual disputes to litigation

PurposeJudiciary plays a pivotal role in the overall development of a nation's economy and its involvement assures process transparency and impartiality. However, litigation is often expensive, uncertain and prone to delays. Notwithstanding such inherent challenges associated with litigation, it is observed that parties in construction disputes do resort to litigation. This study attempts to understand the potential paths triggering litigation of contractual disputes in construction. While extant researchers have identified focus areas or factors influencing litigation, the underlying paths connecting these focus areas, leading parties to litigation, is explored in this study.Design/methodology/approachConsidering the framework of Rachlinski's "framing theory of litigation" and the mixed-methods approach (qualitative and quantitative approaches), this study proposes and validates a model that identifies the paths to litigation of contractual disputes in construction.FindingsThe results of in-depth interviews, followed by validation through structural equation modelling (SEM), reveal four critical paths, namely positional focus (PF) - contract and dispute characteristics (CDC) - decision to litigate (DTL), milieu influence (MI) - CDC - DTL, MI-PF-DTL and CDC-DTL.Practical implicationsThe identified paths highlight the areas policymakers can consider while developing policy interventions to mitigate litigation.Originality/valueResearchers have identified factors causing litigation in construction. However, attempts to examine the existence of multi-factor "paths" on the decision to litigate (DTL) have hitherto received a muted response, so this study focuses on identifying the project-level path(s) leading to the litigation of contractual disputes in construction.