Evaluating the Effects of Precipitation and Evapotranspiration on Soil Moisture Variability Within CMIP5 Using SMAP and ERA5 Data

被引:2
|
作者
Xi, Xuan [1 ]
Zhuang, Qianlai [1 ,2 ]
Kim, Seungbum [3 ]
Gentine, Pierre [4 ]
机构
[1] Purdue Univ, Dept Earth Atmospher & Planetary Sci, W Lafayette, IN USA
[2] Purdue Univ, Dept Agron, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA
[3] NASA Jet Prop Lab, Pasadena, CA USA
[4] Columbia Univ, Dept Earth Environm Engn, New York, NY USA
关键词
soil moisture; precipitation; evapotranspiration; earth system models; Fourier transform; LAND-ATMOSPHERE INTERACTIONS; TERRESTRIAL; VALIDATION; MEMORY; WATER;
D O I
10.1029/2022WR034225
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The effects of precipitation (Pr) and evapotranspiration (ET) on surface soil moisture (SSM) play an essential role in the land-atmosphere system. Here we evaluate multimodel differences of these effects within the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5 (CMIP5) compared to Soil Moisture Active Passive (SMAP) products and ECMWF Reanalysis v5 (ERA5) as references in a frequency domain. The variability of SSM, Pr, and ET within three frequency bands (1/7 similar to 1/30 days(-1), 1/30 similar to 1/90 days(-1), and 1/90 similar to 1/365 days(-1)) after normalization is quantified using Fourier transform. We analyze the impact of ET and Pr on SSM variability based on a transfer function assuming that these variables form a linear time-invariant (LTI) system. For the total effects of ET and Pr on SSM variability, the CMIP5 estimations are smaller than the reference data in the two higher frequency bands and are larger than the reference data in the lowest frequency band. Besides, the effects on SSM by Pr and ET are found to be different across the three frequency bands. In each frequency band, the variability of the factor that dominates SSM (i.e., Pr or ET) from CMIP5 is smaller than that from the references. This study identifies the spatiotemporal distribution of differences between CMIP5 models and references (SMAP and ERA5) in simulating ET and Pr effects on SSM within three frequency bands. This study provides insightful information on how soil moisture variability is affected by varying precipitation and evapotranspiration at different time scales within Earth System Models. Plain Language Summary Climate is influenced by the interactions between the land surface and atmosphere boundary, and soil moisture is a key component of these physical processes. Precipitation and evapotranspiration, as two major variables involved in these interactions, have been largely regarded as essential processes affecting soil moisture dynamics. However, Earth System Models have large uncertainties in simulating these effects. This study compares the average performance of 14 Earth System Models in capturing the effects of precipitation and evapotranspiration on surface soil moisture variability. We find that (a) soil moisture is mainly affected by precipitation at weekly to seasonal time scales and by evapotranspiration at seasonal to annual time scales; (b) compared to two largely used reference data, the total effects of precipitation and evapotranspiration on soil moisture is smaller at weekly to seasonal time scales and are larger at seasonal to annual time scale; and (c) spatially, models tend to simulate less variability of precipitation or evapotranspiration as a major control on surface soil moisture.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] An assessment of historical Antarctic precipitation and temperature trend using CMIP5 models and reanalysis datasets
    Tang, Malcolm S. Y.
    Chenoli, Sheeba Nettukandy
    Abu Samah, Azizan
    Hai, Ooi See
    POLAR SCIENCE, 2018, 15 : 1 - 12
  • [32] Evaluating CMIP5 models using AIRS tropospheric air temperature and specific humidity climatology
    Tian, Baijun
    Fetzer, Eric J.
    Kahn, Brian H.
    Teixeira, Joao
    Manning, Evan
    Hearty, Thomas
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2013, 118 (01) : 114 - 134
  • [33] Filling Gaps in Hourly Air Temperature Data Using Debiased ERA5 Data
    Lompar, Milos
    Lalic, Branislava
    Dekic, Ljiljana
    Petric, Mina
    ATMOSPHERE, 2019, 10 (01)
  • [34] Climatological Changes in Soil Moisture during the 21st Century over the Indian Region Using CMIP5 and Satellite Observations
    Sravani, Charakola
    Kishore, Pangaluru
    Jiang, Jonathan H.
    Rao, S. Vijaya Bhaskara
    REMOTE SENSING, 2022, 14 (09)
  • [35] Interannual and low-frequency variability of Upper Indus Basin winter/spring precipitation in observations and CMIP5 models
    Greene, Arthur M.
    Robertson, Andrew W.
    CLIMATE DYNAMICS, 2017, 49 (11-12) : 4171 - 4188
  • [36] Changes in Precipitation Patterns in Poland Derived From Projected Downscaled Future Climate Data From CMIP5 and CMIP6
    Rutkowska, Agnieszka
    Willems, Patrick
    Paz, Santiago Mendoza
    Ziernicka-Wojtaszek, Agnieszka
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLIMATOLOGY, 2025,
  • [37] Interannual and low-frequency variability of Upper Indus Basin winter/spring precipitation in observations and CMIP5 models
    Arthur M. Greene
    Andrew W. Robertson
    Climate Dynamics, 2017, 49 : 4171 - 4188
  • [38] An evaluation of CMIP5 precipitation simulations using ground observations over ten river basins in China
    Yang, Xiuqin
    Yong, Bin
    Yu, Zhiguo
    Zhang, Yuqing
    HYDROLOGY RESEARCH, 2021, 52 (03): : 676 - 698
  • [39] Evaluating climate and soil effects on regional soil moisture spatial variability using EOFs
    Wang, Tiejun
    Franz, Trenton E.
    Li, Ruopu
    You, Jinsheng
    Shulski, Martha D.
    Ray, Chittaranjan
    WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2017, 53 (05) : 4022 - 4035
  • [40] Modeling of Ethiopian Wind Power Production Using ERA5 Reanalysis Data
    Nefabas, Kena Likassa
    Soder, Lennart
    Mamo, Mengesha
    Olauson, Jon
    ENERGIES, 2021, 14 (09)