A Deep Learning Model for Estimating Tropical Cyclone Wind Radius from Geostationary Satellite Infrared Imagery

被引:12
作者
Wang, Chong [1 ,2 ]
Li, Xiaofeng [1 ]
机构
[1] Inst Oceanol, Key Lab Ocean Circulat & Waves, Qingdao, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Beijing, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Tropical cyclones; Remote sensing; Deep learning; SENSOR MICROWAVE IMAGER; NEURAL-NETWORKS; INTENSITY; SIZE; TRACK; SPEED;
D O I
10.1175/MWR-D-22-0166.1
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
This article developed a deep learning (DL) model for estimating tropical cyclone (TC) 34-, 50-, and 64-kt (1 kt approximate to 0.51 m s(-1)) wind radii in four quadrants from infrared images in the global ocean. We collected 63 675 TC images from 2004 to 2016 and divided them into three periods (2004-12, 2013-14, and 2015-16) for model training, validation, and testing. First, four DL-based radius estimation models were developed to estimate the TC wind radius for each of the four quadrants. Then, the entire original images and the one-quarter-quadrant subimages were included in the model training for each quadrant. Last, we modified the mean absolute error (MAE) loss function in these DL-based models to reduce the side effect of an unbalanced distribution of wind radii and developed an asymmetric TC wind radius estimation model globally. The comparison of model results with the best-track data of TCs shows that the MAEs of 34-kt wind radius are 18.8, 19.5, 18.6, and 18.8 n mi (1 n mi = 1.852 km) for the northeast, southeast, southwest, and northwest quadrants, respectively. The MAEs of 50-kt wind radius are 11.3, 11.3, 11.1, and 10.8 n mi, respectively, and the MAEs of 64-kt wind radius are 8.9, 9.9, 9.2, and 8.7 n mi, respectively. These results represent a 12.1%-35.5% improvement over existing methods in the literature. In addition, the DL-based models were interpreted with two deep visualization toolboxes. The results indicate that the TC eye, cloud, and TC spiral structure are the main factors that affect the model performance.
引用
收藏
页码:403 / 417
页数:15
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]   Impact of Storm Size on Prediction of Storm Track and Intensity Using the 2016 Operational GFDL Hurricane Model [J].
Bender, Morris A. ;
Marchok, Timothy P. ;
Sampson, Charles R. ;
Knaff, John A. ;
Morin, Matthew J. .
WEATHER AND FORECASTING, 2017, 32 (04) :1491-1508
[2]   Size and Strength of Tropical Cyclones as Inferred from QuikSCAT Data [J].
Chan, Kelvin T. F. ;
Chan, Johnny C. L. .
MONTHLY WEATHER REVIEW, 2012, 140 (03) :811-824
[3]   A QuikSCAT climatology of tropical cyclone size [J].
Chavas, D. R. ;
Emanuel, K. A. .
GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2010, 37
[4]   Estimating Tropical Cyclone Intensity by Satellite Imagery Utilizing Convolutional Neural Networks [J].
Chen, Buo-Fu ;
Chen, Boyo ;
Lin, Hsuan-Tien ;
Elsberry, Russell L. .
WEATHER AND FORECASTING, 2019, 34 (02) :447-465
[5]   Xception: Deep Learning with Depthwise Separable Convolutions [J].
Chollet, Francois .
30TH IEEE CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER VISION AND PATTERN RECOGNITION (CVPR 2017), 2017, :1800-1807
[6]   Improvements to the Operational Tropical Cyclone Wind Speed Probability Model [J].
DeMaria, Mark ;
Knaff, John A. ;
Brennan, Michael J. ;
Brown, Daniel ;
Knabb, Richard D. ;
DeMaria, Robert T. ;
Schumacher, Andrea ;
Lauer, Christopher A. ;
Roberts, David P. ;
Sampson, Charles R. ;
Santos, Pablo ;
Sharp, David ;
Winters, Katherine A. .
WEATHER AND FORECASTING, 2013, 28 (03) :586-602
[7]   The Use of the Deviation Angle Variance Technique on Geostationary Satellite Imagery to Estimate Tropical Cyclone Size Parameters [J].
Dolling, Klaus ;
Ritchie, Elizabeth A. ;
Tyo, J. Scott .
WEATHER AND FORECASTING, 2016, 31 (05) :1625-1642
[8]  
Ebuchi N, 2002, J ATMOS OCEAN TECH, V19, P2049, DOI 10.1175/1520-0426(2002)019<2049:EOWVOB>2.0.CO
[9]  
2
[10]   Estimation of Wind Direction in Tropical Cyclones Using C-Band Dual-Polarization Synthetic Aperture Radar [J].
Fan, Shengren ;
Zhang, Biao ;
Mouche, Alexis A. ;
Perrie, William ;
Zhang, Jun A. ;
Zhang, Guosheng .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 2020, 58 (02) :1450-1462