Pressure Sensitivity Prediction and Pressure Measurement of Fast Response Pressure-Sensitive Paint Based on Artificial Neural Network

被引:0
作者
Liao, Xianhui [1 ,2 ]
Wei, Chunhua [2 ]
Zuo, Chenglin [2 ]
Gao, Zhisheng [1 ]
Jiang, Hailin [2 ]
Liang, Lei [2 ]
Li, Zhaoyan [1 ]
机构
[1] Xihua Univ, Sch Comp & Software Engn, Chengdu 610039, Peoples R China
[2] China Aerodynam Res & Dev Ctr, Mianyang 621000, Peoples R China
来源
APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL | 2023年 / 13卷 / 06期
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
pressure-sensitive paint; characterization prediction; artificial neural network; pressure measurement;
D O I
10.3390/app13063504
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
The characterization of pressure-sensitive paint (PSP) is affected by many physical and chemical factors, making it is difficult to analyze the relationship between characterization and influencing factors. An artificial neural network (ANN)-based method for predicting pressure sensitivity using paint thickness and roughness was proposed in this paper. The mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) for predicting pressure sensitivity is 6.5088%. The difference of paint thickness and roughness between sample and model surface may be a source of experimental error in PSP pressure measurement tests. The Stern-Volmer coefficients A and B are strongly linked. Pressure sensitivity is approximately equal to coefficient B, so coefficient A is predicted using pressure sensitivity based on the same ANN, and the MAPE of predicting A is 2.1315%. Then, we try to calculate the pressure by using the thickness and roughness on a model to predict pressure sensitivity and Stern-Volmer coefficient A. The PSP pressure measurement test was carried out at the China Aerodynamic Research and Development Center. Using the Stern-Volmer coefficient calculated by the in situ method, the method in this paper, and the sample calibration experiment, the root mean square errors (RMSE) of the pressure are 47.4431 Pa, 63.4736 Pa, and 73.0223 Pa, respectively.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 21 条
[11]   Dynamic Response of Polymer Ceramic Pressure-Sensitive Paint: Improved Model Considering Thickness Effect [J].
Jiao, Lingrui ;
Peng, Di ;
Liu, Yingzheng .
AIAA JOURNAL, 2018, 56 (07) :2903-2906
[12]   In situ calibration uncertainty of pressure-sensitive paint [J].
Liu, TS ;
Sullivan, JP .
AIAA JOURNAL, 2003, 41 (11) :2300-2302
[13]  
Marquez L., 1992, HICSS, P494
[14]  
Mitsuo K., 2007, P 45 AIAA AER SCI M, DOI [10.2514/6.2007-1065, DOI 10.2514/6.2007-1065]
[15]   Aircraft ice accretion prediction based on neural networks [J].
Ogretim, E ;
Huebsch, W ;
Shinn, A .
JOURNAL OF AIRCRAFT, 2006, 43 (01) :233-240
[16]   Effect of Oxygen Mole Fraction on Static Properties of Pressure-Sensitive Paint [J].
Okudera, Tomohiro ;
Nagata, Takayuki ;
Kasai, Miku ;
Saito, Yuji ;
Nonomura, Taku ;
Asai, Keisuke .
SENSORS, 2021, 21 (04) :1-15
[17]  
Ouchi H., 2005, P 43 AIAA AEROSPACE, DOI [10.2514/6.2005-1079, DOI 10.2514/6.2005-1079]
[18]   Fast pressure-sensitive paint for understanding complex flows: from regular to harsh environments [J].
Peng, Di ;
Liu, Yingzheng .
EXPERIMENTS IN FLUIDS, 2020, 61 (01)
[19]   Simultaneous PSP and TSP measurements of transient flow in a long-duration hypersonic tunnel [J].
Peng, Di ;
Jiao, Lingrui ;
Sun, Zhijun ;
Gu, Yunsong ;
Liu, Yingzheng .
EXPERIMENTS IN FLUIDS, 2016, 57 (12)
[20]   Application of GMDH neural network technique to improve measuring precision of a simplified photon attenuation based two-phase flowmeter [J].
Roshani, Mohammadmehdi ;
Sattari, Mohammad Amir ;
Ali, Peshawa Jammal Muhammad ;
Roshani, Gholam Hossein ;
Nazemi, Behrooz ;
Corniani, Enrico ;
Nazemi, Ehsan .
FLOW MEASUREMENT AND INSTRUMENTATION, 2020, 75