Pressure Sensitivity Prediction and Pressure Measurement of Fast Response Pressure-Sensitive Paint Based on Artificial Neural Network

被引:0
作者
Liao, Xianhui [1 ,2 ]
Wei, Chunhua [2 ]
Zuo, Chenglin [2 ]
Gao, Zhisheng [1 ]
Jiang, Hailin [2 ]
Liang, Lei [2 ]
Li, Zhaoyan [1 ]
机构
[1] Xihua Univ, Sch Comp & Software Engn, Chengdu 610039, Peoples R China
[2] China Aerodynam Res & Dev Ctr, Mianyang 621000, Peoples R China
来源
APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL | 2023年 / 13卷 / 06期
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
pressure-sensitive paint; characterization prediction; artificial neural network; pressure measurement;
D O I
10.3390/app13063504
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
The characterization of pressure-sensitive paint (PSP) is affected by many physical and chemical factors, making it is difficult to analyze the relationship between characterization and influencing factors. An artificial neural network (ANN)-based method for predicting pressure sensitivity using paint thickness and roughness was proposed in this paper. The mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) for predicting pressure sensitivity is 6.5088%. The difference of paint thickness and roughness between sample and model surface may be a source of experimental error in PSP pressure measurement tests. The Stern-Volmer coefficients A and B are strongly linked. Pressure sensitivity is approximately equal to coefficient B, so coefficient A is predicted using pressure sensitivity based on the same ANN, and the MAPE of predicting A is 2.1315%. Then, we try to calculate the pressure by using the thickness and roughness on a model to predict pressure sensitivity and Stern-Volmer coefficient A. The PSP pressure measurement test was carried out at the China Aerodynamic Research and Development Center. Using the Stern-Volmer coefficient calculated by the in situ method, the method in this paper, and the sample calibration experiment, the root mean square errors (RMSE) of the pressure are 47.4431 Pa, 63.4736 Pa, and 73.0223 Pa, respectively.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]   Prediction of Aircraft Failure Times Using Artificial Neural Networks and Genetic Algorithms [J].
Altay, Ayca ;
Ozkan, Omer ;
Kayakutlu, Gulgun .
JOURNAL OF AIRCRAFT, 2014, 51 (01) :47-53
[2]  
Borovykh A, 2018, Arxiv, DOI arXiv:1703.04691
[3]   Single-shot temperature-and pressure-sensitive paint measurements on an unsteady helicopter blade [J].
Disotell, Kevin J. ;
Peng, Di ;
Juliano, Thomas J. ;
Gregory, James W. ;
Crafton, Jim W. ;
Komerath, Narayanan M. .
EXPERIMENTS IN FLUIDS, 2014, 55 (02)
[4]   Using Convolutional Neural Networks to Automate Aircraft Maintenance Visual Inspection [J].
Dogru, Anil ;
Bouarfa, Soufiane ;
Arizar, Ridwan ;
Aydogan, Reyhan .
AEROSPACE, 2020, 7 (12)
[5]   Pressure sensitive paint in transonic wind-tunnel testing of the F-15 [J].
Dowgwillo, RM ;
Morris, MJ ;
Donovan, JF ;
Benne, ME .
JOURNAL OF AIRCRAFT, 1996, 33 (01) :109-116
[6]   Investigation of Factors Causing Nonuniformity in Luminescence Lifetime of Fast-Responding Pressure-Sensitive Paints [J].
Egami, Yasuhiro ;
Yamazaki, Yuya ;
Hori, Naoto ;
Sugioka, Yosuke ;
Nakakita, Kazuyuki .
SENSORS, 2021, 21 (18)
[7]   Effects of solvents for luminophore on dynamic and static characteristics of sprayable polymer/ceramic pressure-sensitive paint [J].
Egami, Yasuhiro ;
Konishi, Shota ;
Sato, Yudai ;
Matsuda, Yu .
SENSORS AND ACTUATORS A-PHYSICAL, 2019, 286 :188-194
[8]   A review of pressure-sensitive paint for high-speed and unsteady aerodynamics [J].
Gregory, J. W. ;
Asai, K. ;
Kameda, M. ;
Liu, T. ;
Sullivan, J. P. .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS PART G-JOURNAL OF AEROSPACE ENGINEERING, 2008, 222 (G2) :249-290
[9]   Dynamic and Steady Characteristics of Polymer-Ceramic Pressure-Sensitive Paint with Variation in Layer Thickness [J].
Hayashi, Tatsunori ;
Sakaue, Hirotaka .
SENSORS, 2017, 17 (05)
[10]  
Hinton G E., 2012, arXiv