What medical students with better academic results do: a cross-sectional analysis

被引:6
作者
Urrizola, Amaia [1 ,2 ]
Santiago, Raul [3 ]
Gea, Alfredo [2 ,4 ]
Rubio, Sandra [1 ]
Vilalta-Lacarra, Anna [1 ]
Rodriguez, Javier [1 ]
Arbea, Leire [2 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Clin Univ Navarra, Dept Med Oncol, C Pio XII 36, Navarra 31008, Spain
[2] Univ Navarra, Dept Med Educ, C Irunlarrea 1, Navarra 31008, Spain
[3] Univ La Rioja, Dept Educ Sci, C Luis De Ulloa 2, Logrono 26004, Spain
[4] Univ Navarra, Dept Prevent Med & Publ Hlth, C Irunlarrea 1, Navarra 31008, Spain
[5] Clin Univ Navarra, Dept Radiat Oncol, C Pio XII 36, Navarra 31008, Spain
关键词
Medical education; Undergraduate education; Academic performance; Learning Approach; Student Engagement; Motivation; Intrinsic Value; Self-regulation; LEARNING STYLES; ACHIEVEMENT; ASSOCIATION;
D O I
10.1186/s12909-023-03999-7
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Background With university material doubling over time, medical students need to learn how to become successful life-long learners. Overall a Deep Approach (DA) to learning, and Self-Regulation (SR) skills are among the elements with a potential to accelerate learning, and Student Engagement (SE) has been associated with better university outcomes. However, specific recommendations concerning what students should do are lacking. The aim of this study was to identify above-average students' specific attitudes and strategies toward learning. Methods A cross-sectional analysis of the answers to the validated questionnaires Revised Study Process Questionnaire (R-SPQ-2F), SE, and Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ) of 155 s and third-year students included in a prospective interventional study in the University of Navarre in September 2020 was performed. Students were stratified according to their standardized average mean in above-average (mean > 0) and below-average (mean <= 0). Results Overall, 67.1% of students scored higher in DA than in Surface Approach (SA) and had very high Intrinsic Value (IV, median 5.9). A higher proportion of above-average students had DA > SA score (72.7% vs 57.1%, p = 0.05), and showed higher scores in SR (median 4.9 vs 4.3, p = 0.007) compared to below-average, while the latter scored higher in SA (median 24.5 vs 23, p = 0.04), and surface motive (median 11 vs 9, p = 0.007). No differences were found in SE, and both groups had average scores in the cooperative dimension. Differences were rooted to hard work, interest over material and prioritizing understanding over rote-learning motives and aligned strategies. Conclusions Curricula design and assessment should be aligned to promote DA and SR skills among learners. Furthermore, it is paramount that teachers help instill students with interest over material and encourage understanding and hard work, since are traits associated with better results. More studies concerning metacognition and other promising traits for becoming life-long learners and prepared professionals should be made.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]  
Ahlfeldt S., 2005, HIGHER ED RES DEV, V24, P5, DOI [DOI 10.1080/0729436052000318541, https://doi.org/10.1080/0729436052000318541]
[2]   Association Between Learning Approaches and Medical Student Academic Progression During Preclinical Training [J].
Bansal, Sandeep ;
Bansal, Minakshi ;
White, Stanley .
ADVANCES IN MEDICAL EDUCATION AND PRACTICE, 2021, 12 :1343-1351
[3]   The revised two-factor Study Process Questionnaire: R-SPQ-2F [J].
Biggs, J ;
Kember, D ;
Leung, DYP .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2001, 71 :133-149
[4]   KNOWLEDGE WHICH CANNOT BE USED IS USELESS [J].
COX, K .
MEDICAL TEACHER, 1987, 9 (02) :145-154
[5]   Long-term retention of basic science knowledge: a review study [J].
Custers, Eugene J. F. M. .
ADVANCES IN HEALTH SCIENCES EDUCATION, 2010, 15 (01) :109-128
[6]  
Faculty of Medicine Asia Metropolitan University Johor MALAYSIA, 2018, Education in Medicine Journal, V10, P63, DOI [10.21315/eimj2018.10.3.7, 10.21315/eimj2018.10.3, DOI 10.21315/EIMJ2018.10.3, 10.21315/eimj2018.10.3.7, DOI 10.21315/EIMJ2018.10.3.7]
[7]   Exam Success at Undergraduate and Graduate-Entry Medical Schools: Is Learning Style or Learning Approach More Important? A Critical Review Exploring Links Between Academic Success, Learning Styles, and Learning Approaches Among School-Leaver Entry ("Traditional") and Graduate-Entry ("Nontraditional") Medical Students [J].
Feeley, Anne-Marie ;
Biggerstaff, Deborah L. .
TEACHING AND LEARNING IN MEDICINE, 2015, 27 (03) :237-244
[8]   Motivated strategies for learning and their association with academic performance of a diverse group of 1st-year medical students [J].
Hamid, S. ;
Singaram, V. S. .
AFRICAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH PROFESSIONS EDUCATION, 2016, 8 (01) :104-107
[9]  
Hattie JAC, 2009, VISIBLE LEARNING: A SYNTHESIS OF OVER 800 META-ANALYSES RELATING TO ACHIEVEMENT, P1
[10]   Thinking about thinking: changes in first-year medical students' metacognition and its relation to performance [J].
Hong, Wei Han ;
Vadivelu, Jamunarani ;
Daniel, Esther Gnanamalar Sarojini ;
Sim, Joong Hiong .
MEDICAL EDUCATION ONLINE, 2015, 20