Endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation vs endoscopic sphincterotomy for retrieval of common bile duct stones:A meta-analysis

被引:18
作者
Piao-Piao Jin [1 ]
Jian-Feng Cheng [2 ]
Dan Liu [3 ]
Mei Mei [4 ]
Zhao-Qi Xu [5 ]
Lei-Min Sun [1 ]
机构
[1] Department of Gastroenterology,Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital,School of Medicine,Zhejiang University
[2] Fifth People’s Hospital of Yuhang District
[3] Internal Medicine,Division of Gastroenterology,Carolinas Medical Center,Charlotte,NC 28203,United States
[4] Department of Statistics,Texas A and M University,College Station,TX 77843,United States
[5] Doppler Ultrasonic Department,The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine
关键词
Endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation; Endoscopic sphincterotomy; Mechanical lithotripsy; Common bile duct stones; Meta analysis;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R657.42 [];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100210 ;
摘要
AIM:To compare the efficacy and safety of endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation(EPLBD)with endoscopic sphincterotomy(EST)in retrieval of common bile duct stones(≥10 mm).METHODS:PubMed,Web of Knowledge,EBSCO,the Cochrane Library,and EMBASE were searched for eligible studies.Randomized controlled trials(RCTs)that compared EPLBD with EST were identified.Data extraction and quality assessment were performed by two independent reviewers using the same criteria.Any disagreement was discussed with a third reviewer until a final consensus was reached.Pooled outcomes of complete bile duct stone clearance,stone clearance in one session,requirement for mechanical lithotripsy,and overall complication rate were determined using relative risk and 95%CI.The separate post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography complications were pooled and determined with the Peto odds ratio and95%CI because of the small number of events.Heterogeneity was evaluated with the chi-squared test with P≤0.1 and I2 with a cutoff of≥50%.A fixed effects model was used primarily.A random effects model was applied when significant heterogeneity was detected.Sensitivity analysis was applied to explore the potential bias.RESULTS:Five randomized controlled trials with 621participants were included.EPLBD compared with EST had similar outcomes with regard to complete stone removal rate(93.7%vs 92.5%,P=0.54)and complete duct clearance in one session(82.2%vs 77.7%,P=0.17).Mechanical lithotripsy was performed less in EPLBD in the retrieval of whole stones(15.5%vs25.2%,P=0.003),as well as in the stratified subgroup of stones larger than 15 mm(24.2%vs 40%,P=0.001).There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of overall adverse events(7.9%vs 10.7%,P=0.25),post-ERCP pancreatitis(4.0%vs 5.0%,P=0.54),hemorrhage(1.7%vs 2.8%,P=0.32),perforation(0.3%vs 0.9%,P=0.35)or acute cholangitis(1.3%vs 1.3%,P=0.92).CONCLUSION:EPLBD could be advocated as an alternative to EST in the retrieval of large common bile duct stones.
引用
收藏
页码:5548 / 5556
页数:9
相关论文
共 19 条
  • [11] A Comparative Study of Outcomes Between Endoscope Sphincterotomy Plus Endoscope Papillary Large Balloon Dilatation and Endoscopic Sphincterotomy Alone in Patients with Large Extrahepatic Bile Duct Stones
    Kim, Tae Hyeon
    Oh, Hyo Jeong
    Im, Chong Ju
    Choi, Chang Soo
    Kweon, Ji Hye
    Sohn, Young Woo
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2009, 69 (05) : AB156 - AB156
  • [12] Endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation for large common bile duct stones
    Attam, Rajeev
    Freeman, Martin L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEPATO-BILIARY-PANCREATIC SURGERY, 2009, 16 (05): : 618 - 623
  • [13] The learning curve for safety and success of precut sphincterotomy for therapeutic ERCP: a single endoscopist's experience[J] . T. Akaraviputh,V. Lohsiriwat,J. Swangsri,A. Methasate,S. Leelakusolvong,N. Lertakayamanee.Endoscopy . 2008 (06)
  • [14] Endoscopic sphincterotomy plus large-balloon dilation versus endoscopic sphincterotomy for removal of bile-duct stones
    Heo, Jeung Ho
    Kang, Dae Hwan
    Jung, Hyo Jin
    Kwon, Dae Sik
    An, Jin Kwang
    Kim, Bo Suk
    Suh, Kyung Duk
    Lee, Sang Yong
    Lee, Joo Ho
    Kim, Gwang Ha
    Kim, Tae Oh
    Heo, Jeong
    Song, Geun Am
    Cho, Mong
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2007, 66 (04) : 720 - 726
  • [15] Endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation compared to endoscopic sphincterotomy for removal of large common bile duct stones
    Bang, Sung-Jo
    Eum, Jun Bum
    Du Jeong, In
    Jung, Seok Won
    Shin, Jung Woo
    Park, Neung Hwa
    Kim, Do H. A.
    Lee, Ji-Ho
    Jung, Young Ki
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2007, 65 (05) : AB214 - AB214
  • [16] Difficult bile duct stones
    McHenry L.
    Lehman G.
    [J]. Current Treatment Options in Gastroenterology, 2006, 9 (2) : 123 - 132
  • [17] Endoscopic Balloon Dilation of the Biliary Sphincter Compared to Endoscopic Biliary Sphincterotomy for Removal of Common Bile Duct Stones During ERCP: A Meta-analysis of Randomized, Controlled Trials[J] . Todd Baron,Gavin Harewood.Gastrointestinal Endoscopy . 2004 (5)
  • [18] Biliary sphincterotomy plus dilation with a large balloon for bile duct stones that are difficult to extract
    Ersoz, G
    Tekesin, O
    Ozutemiz, AO
    Gunsar, F
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2003, 57 (02) : 156 - 159
  • [19] Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary?[J] . Alejandro R. Jadad,R.Andrew Moore,Dawn Carroll,Crispin Jenkinson,D.John M. Reynolds,David J. Gavaghan,Henry J. McQuay.Controlled Clinical Trials . 1996 (1)