Endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation vs endoscopic sphincterotomy for retrieval of common bile duct stones:A meta-analysis

被引:18
作者
Piao-Piao Jin [1 ]
Jian-Feng Cheng [2 ]
Dan Liu [3 ]
Mei Mei [4 ]
Zhao-Qi Xu [5 ]
Lei-Min Sun [1 ]
机构
[1] Department of Gastroenterology,Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital,School of Medicine,Zhejiang University
[2] Fifth People’s Hospital of Yuhang District
[3] Internal Medicine,Division of Gastroenterology,Carolinas Medical Center,Charlotte,NC 28203,United States
[4] Department of Statistics,Texas A and M University,College Station,TX 77843,United States
[5] Doppler Ultrasonic Department,The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine
关键词
Endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation; Endoscopic sphincterotomy; Mechanical lithotripsy; Common bile duct stones; Meta analysis;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R657.42 [];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100210 ;
摘要
AIM:To compare the efficacy and safety of endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation(EPLBD)with endoscopic sphincterotomy(EST)in retrieval of common bile duct stones(≥10 mm).METHODS:PubMed,Web of Knowledge,EBSCO,the Cochrane Library,and EMBASE were searched for eligible studies.Randomized controlled trials(RCTs)that compared EPLBD with EST were identified.Data extraction and quality assessment were performed by two independent reviewers using the same criteria.Any disagreement was discussed with a third reviewer until a final consensus was reached.Pooled outcomes of complete bile duct stone clearance,stone clearance in one session,requirement for mechanical lithotripsy,and overall complication rate were determined using relative risk and 95%CI.The separate post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography complications were pooled and determined with the Peto odds ratio and95%CI because of the small number of events.Heterogeneity was evaluated with the chi-squared test with P≤0.1 and I2 with a cutoff of≥50%.A fixed effects model was used primarily.A random effects model was applied when significant heterogeneity was detected.Sensitivity analysis was applied to explore the potential bias.RESULTS:Five randomized controlled trials with 621participants were included.EPLBD compared with EST had similar outcomes with regard to complete stone removal rate(93.7%vs 92.5%,P=0.54)and complete duct clearance in one session(82.2%vs 77.7%,P=0.17).Mechanical lithotripsy was performed less in EPLBD in the retrieval of whole stones(15.5%vs25.2%,P=0.003),as well as in the stratified subgroup of stones larger than 15 mm(24.2%vs 40%,P=0.001).There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of overall adverse events(7.9%vs 10.7%,P=0.25),post-ERCP pancreatitis(4.0%vs 5.0%,P=0.54),hemorrhage(1.7%vs 2.8%,P=0.32),perforation(0.3%vs 0.9%,P=0.35)or acute cholangitis(1.3%vs 1.3%,P=0.92).CONCLUSION:EPLBD could be advocated as an alternative to EST in the retrieval of large common bile duct stones.
引用
收藏
页码:5548 / 5556
页数:9
相关论文
共 19 条
  • [1] Endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation in patients with periampullary diverticula[J]. Kook Hyun Kim,Tae Nyeun Kim.World Journal of Gastroenterology. 2013(41)
  • [2] Endoscopic papillary balloon dilation after sphincterotomy for difficult choledocholithiasis:A case-controlled study[J]. Bruno Rosa,Pedro Moutinho Ribeiro,Ana Rebelo,António Pinto Correia,José Cotter.World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 2013(05)
  • [3] Small sphincterotomy combined with endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation versus sphincterotomy[J]. Hyun Gun Kim,Young Koog Cheon,Young Deok Cho,Jong Ho Moon,Do Hyun Park,Tae Hoon Lee,Hyun Jong Choi,Sang-Heum Park,Joon Seong Lee,Moon Sung Lee.World Journal of Gastroenterology. 2009(34)
  • [4] Randomized Trial of Endoscopic Sphincterotomy With Balloon Dilation Versus Endoscopic Sphincterotomy Alone for Removal of Bile Duct Stones[J] . Anthony Yuen Bun Teoh,Frances Ka Yin Cheung,Bing Hu,Ya Min Pan,Larry Hin Lai,Philip Wai Yan Chiu,Simon Kin Hung Wong,Francis Ka Leung Chan,James Yun Wong Lau.Gastroenterology . 2013
  • [5] Endoscopic Papillary Large Balloon Dilatation Alone Is Safe and Effective for the Treatment of Difficult Choledocholithiasis in Cases of Billroth II Gastrectomy: A Single Center Experience[J] . Hui Won Jang,Kyong Joo Lee,Moon Jae Jung,Joo Won Jung,Jeong Youp Park,Seung Woo Park,Si Young Song,Jae Bock Chung,Seungmin Bang.Digestive Diseases and Sciences . 2013 (6)
  • [6] Endoscopic sphincterotomy plus balloon dilation versus endoscopic sphincterotomy for choledocholithiasis: A meta‐analysis[J] . Yangyang Liu,Peizhu Su,Yinghao Lin,Siheng Lin,Kun Xiao,Pingyan Chen,Shengli An,Yang Bai,Fachao Zhi.J Gastroenterol Hepatol . 2013 (6)
  • [7] Prospective comparative study of endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation and endoscopic sphincterotomy for removal of large bile duct stones in patients above 45 years of age[J] . Myung Jin Oh,Tae Nyeun Kim.Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology . 2012 (8-9)
  • [8] Comparison of endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation and endoscopic sphincterotomy for retrieval of choledocholithiasis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials[J] . Yadong Feng,Hong Zhu,Xiaoxing Chen,Shunfu Xu,Wenfang Cheng,Jinliang Ni,Ruihua Shi.Journal of Gastroenterology . 2012 (6)
  • [9] Mo1300 Endoscopic Sphincterotomy (ES) Combined With Endoscopic Papillary Large Balloon Dilation (EPLBD) Reduces the Need for Mechanical Lithotripsy in Patients With Large Bile Duct Stones: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis[J] . Mohammad F. Madhoun,Sachin Wani,Shih-Kuang S. Hong,William M. Tierney,John T. Maple.Gastrointestinal Endoscopy . 2012 (4)
  • [10] S1436: Safety and Efficacy of Endoscopic Sphincterotomy (ES) Followed by Endoscopic Papillary Large Balloon Dilation (EPLBD) for Extraction of Large Common Bile Duct Stones (LBDS): A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis[J] . Rajasekhara R. Mummadi,Norio Fukami,Raj J. Shah,Brian C. Brauer,Roy D. Yen,Yang K. Chen.Gastrointestinal Endoscopy . 2010 (5)