The role of time preferences in contract breach:Evidence from Chinese poultry farmers participating in contract farming

被引:0
|
作者
HOU Jing [1 ,2 ]
ZHOU Li [2 ]
Jennifer IFFT [3 ]
YING Rui-yao [2 ]
机构
[1] Business School,Jiangsu Normal University
[2] College of Economics and Management,Nanjing Agricultural University
[3] Department of Agricultural Economics,Kansas State University
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
F326.3 [畜牧业、饲养业];
学科分类号
0202 ; 020205 ; 1203 ;
摘要
Farmers’ contract breach behavior is cited as one of the major stumbling blocks in the sustainable expansion of contract farming in many developing countries. This paper examines farmers’ contract breach decisions from the perspective of time preferences. The empirical analysis is based on a household survey and economic field experiments of poultry households participating in contract farming conducted in Jiangsu Province, China. A discounted utility model and a maximum likelihood technique are applied to estimate farmers’ time preferences and the effect of time preferences on contract breach in the production and sales phases are explored with a bivariate probit model. The results show that, on average, the poultry farmers in the sample are generally present biased and impatient regarding future utility. The regression results show that farmers with a higher preference for the present and a higher discount rate are more likely to breach contracts, and time preferences play a greater role in the production phase than in the sales phase. When considering heterogeneity, specific investments and transaction costs promote contract stability only for farmers with a low degree of impatience. Moreover, compared with large-scale farmers, small-scale farmers’ contract breach decisions are more significantly affected by their time preferences. These results have implications for contract stability policies and other issues that are impacted by the linking of behavioral preferences to agricultural decisions.
引用
收藏
页码:623 / 641
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Are smallholder farmers benefiting from malt barley contract farming engagement in Ethiopia?
    Ganewo, Zerhun
    Balguda, Temesgen
    Alemu, Abera
    Mulugeta, Melese
    Legesse, Tibebu
    Kaske, Deribe
    Ashebir, Aneteneh
    AGRICULTURE & FOOD SECURITY, 2022, 11 (01):
  • [22] Participation in contract farming and farm performance: Insights from cashew farmers in Ghana
    Dubbert, Caroline
    AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2019, 50 (06) : 749 - 763
  • [23] DEMYTHIFYING CONTRACT FARMING: EVIDENCE FROM RURAL SOUTH AFRICA
    Freguin-Gresh, S.
    d'Haese, M.
    Anseeuw, W.
    AGREKON, 2012, 51 (03) : 24 - 51
  • [24] Investigating the role of psychological contract breach on career success: Convergent evidence from two longitudinal studies
    Restubog, Simon Lloyd D.
    Bordia, Prashant
    Bordia, Sarbari
    JOURNAL OF VOCATIONAL BEHAVIOR, 2011, 79 (02) : 428 - 437
  • [25] Smallholders' Preferences for Different Contract Farming Models: Empirical Evidence from Sustainable Certified Coffee Production in Vietnam
    Nguyen Hung Anh
    Bokelmann, Wolfgang
    Ngo Thi Thuan
    Do Thi Nga
    Nguyen Van Minh
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2019, 11 (14)
  • [26] Breach of psychological contract, perception of politics and organizational cynicism: Evidence from Pakistan
    Bashir, Sajid
    Nasir, Zafar Mueen
    Saeed, Sania
    Ahmed, Maimoona
    AFRICAN JOURNAL OF BUSINESS MANAGEMENT, 2011, 5 (03): : 884 - 888
  • [27] Role of Contract Farming in Crop Diversification and Employment Generation: Empirical Evidence from Indian Punjab
    Kaur, Pavneet
    Singla, Naresh
    Singh, Sukhpal
    MILLENNIAL ASIA, 2021, 12 (03) : 350 - 366
  • [28] EFFECT OF PSYCHOLOGICAL CONTRACT BREACH ON EMPLOYEE VOICE BEHAVIOR: EVIDENCE FROM CHINA
    Guo, Yungui
    SOCIAL BEHAVIOR AND PERSONALITY, 2017, 45 (06): : 1019 - 1028
  • [30] Reciprocal effects of psychological contract breach on counterproductive and organizational citizenship behaviors: The role of time
    Griep, Yannick
    Vantilborgh, Tim
    JOURNAL OF VOCATIONAL BEHAVIOR, 2018, 104 : 141 - 153