Comparison between endoscopic sphincterotomy vs endoscopic sphincterotomy associated with balloon dilation for removal of bile duct stones: A systematic review and meta-analysis based on randomized controlled trials

被引:4
作者
Cesar Capel de Clemente Junior [1 ]
Wanderley Marques Bernardo [1 ]
Tomazo Prince Franzini [1 ]
Gustavo Oliveira Luz [1 ]
Marcos Eduardo Lera dos Santos [1 ]
Jonah Maxwell Cohen [2 ]
Diogo Turiani Hourneaux de Moura [1 ]
Fábio Ramalho Tavares Marinho [1 ]
Martin Coronel [1 ]
Paulo Sakai [1 ]
Eduardo Guimar?es Hourneaux de Moura
机构
[1] Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Department of Gastroenterology, University of Sao Paulo Medical School
[2] Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center,Harvard Medical School
关键词
Sphincterotomy; Papillotomy; Dilation; Cholangiopancreatography; Endoscopic retrograde; Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography; Cholangiography;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R657.4 [胆囊、胆管];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100210 ;
摘要
AIM To compare gallstones removal rate and incidence of bleeding, pancreatitis, use of mechanical lithotripsy, cholangitis and perforation between isolated sphincterotomy vs sphincterotomy associated with balloon dilation of papilla in choledocholithiasis through the meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. METHODS We conducted a systematic review according to the PRISMA guidelines. Literature search was restricted to randomized controlled trials(RCTs) on Med Line, Cochrane Library, LILACS, and EMBASE database platforms in July 2017. The manual search included references of retrieved articles. We extracted data focusing on outcomes: The primary endpoint was the stones removal rate; Secondary endpoints were rates of pancreatitis, bleeding, use of mechanical lithotripsy(ML), perforation and cholangitis. RESULTS Eleven RCTs with 1824 patients were included. EST was associated with more post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography(ERCP) bleeding [FE RD-0.02, CI(-0.03,-0.00), I2 = 33%, P = 0.05] and more need of mechanical lithotripsy in general [RE RD-0.16, CI(-0.25,-0.06), I2 = 90%, P = 0.002] and in subgroup analysis of stones greater than 15 mm [RE RD-0.20, CI(-0.38,-0.02), I2 = 82%, P = 0.003]. Incidence of pancreatitis [FE RD-0.01, CI(-0.03, 0.01), I2 = 0, P = 0.36], cholangitis [FE RD-0.00, CI(-0.01, 0.01), I2 =0, P = 0.97] and perforation [FE RD-0.01, CI(-0.01, 0.00), I2 = 0, P = 0.23] was similar between the groups as well as similar stone removal rates in general [FE RD-0.01, CI(-0.01, 0.04), I2 = 0, P = 0.23] and pooled analysis of stones greater than 15 mm [FE RD-0.02, CI(-0.02, 0.07), I2 = 11%, P = 0.31]. CONCLUSION Through meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials we found that isolated sphincterotomy was associated with more post-ERCP bleeding and more need for mechanical lithotripsy. However, there was no statistical difference in the stone removal rate between isolated sphincterotomy and sphincterotomy associated with balloon dilation in the approach to remove gallstones.
引用
收藏
页码:130 / 144
页数:15
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]   Endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation vs endoscopic sphincterotomy for retrieval of common bile duct stones:A meta-analysis [J].
Piao-Piao Jin ;
Jian-Feng Cheng ;
Dan Liu ;
Mei Mei ;
Zhao-Qi Xu ;
Lei-Min Sun .
World Journal of Gastroenterology, 2014, (18) :5548-5556
[2]   Endoscopic sphincterotomy plus large-balloon dilation vs endoscopic sphincterotomy for choledocholithiasis:A meta-analysis [J].
Xiao-Ming Yang ;
Bing Hu .
World Journal of Gastroenterology, 2013, (48) :9453-9460
[3]   Complete endoscopic sphincterotomy with vs. without large-balloon dilation for the removal of large bile duct stones: randomized multicenter study [J].
Karsenti, David ;
Coron, Emmanuel ;
Vanbiervliet, Geoffroy ;
Privat, Jocelyn ;
Kull, Eric ;
Bichard, Philippe ;
Perrot, Bastien ;
Quentin, Vincent ;
Duriez, Arnaud ;
Cholet, Franck ;
Subtil, Clement ;
Duchmann, Jean Christophe ;
Lefort, Christine ;
Hudziak, Herve ;
Koch, Stephane ;
Granval, Philippe ;
Lecleire, Stephane ;
Charachon, Antoine ;
Barange, Karl ;
Cesbron, Elodie Metivier ;
De Widerspach, Axel ;
Le Baleur, Yann ;
Barthet, Marc ;
Poincloux, Laurent .
ENDOSCOPY, 2017, 49 (10) :968-976
[4]  
1060 Can Endoscopic Papillary Balloon Dilation With Minor Sphincterotomy Be a Standard Treatment for the Conventional Bile Duct Stone?[J] . Takeshi Hisa.Gastrointestinal Endoscopy . 2015 (5)
[5]  
Endoscopic Sphincterotomy with Large Balloon Dilation versus Endoscopic Sphincterotomy for Bile Duct Stones: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis[J] . Lei Xu,Moe Htet Kyaw,Yee Kit Tse,James Yun Wong Lau,Sachiyo Nomura.BioMed Research International . 2015
[6]  
Dilation-Assisted Stone Extraction: An Alternative Method for Removal of Common Bile Duct Stones[J] . Guodong Li,Qiuping Pang,Xiujuan Zhang,Haiyan Dong,Rong Guo,Hailan Zhai,Yanchun Dong,Xinyong Jia.Digestive Diseases and Sciences . 2014 (4)
[7]  
Randomized Trial of Endoscopic Sphincterotomy With Balloon Dilation Versus Endoscopic Sphincterotomy Alone for Removal of Bile Duct Stones[J] . Anthony Yuen Bun Teoh,Frances Ka Yin Cheung,Bing Hu,Ya Min Pan,Larry Hin Lai,Philip Wai Yan Chiu,Simon Kin Hung Wong,Francis Ka Leung Chan,James Yun Wong Lau.Gastroenterology . 2013
[8]  
Endoscopic sphincterotomy plus balloon dilation versus endoscopic sphincterotomy for choledocholithiasis: A meta‐analysis[J] . Yangyang Liu,Peizhu Su,Yinghao Lin,Siheng Lin,Kun Xiao,Pingyan Chen,Shengli An,Yang Bai,Fachao Zhi.J Gastroenterol Hepatol . 2013 (6)
[9]  
Factors Predictive of Adverse Events Following Endoscopic Papillary Large Balloon Dilation: Results from a Multicenter Series[J] . Soo Jung Park,Jin Hong Kim,Jae Chul Hwang,Ho Gak Kim,Don Haeng Lee,Seok Jeong,Sang-Woo Cha,Young Deok Cho,Hong Ja Kim,Jong Hyeok Kim,Jong Ho Moon,Sang-Heum Park,Takao Itoi,Hiroyuki Isayama,Hirofumi Kogure,Se Joon Lee,Kyo Tae Jung,Hye Sun Lee,Todd H. Baron,Dong Ki Lee.Digestive Diseases and Sciences . 2013 (4)
[10]  
Prospective comparative study of endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation and endoscopic sphincterotomy for removal of large bile duct stones in patients above 45 years of age[J] . Myung Jin Oh,Tae Nyeun Kim.Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology . 2012 (8-9)