Combined analysis of imaging tumor capsule with imaging tumor size guides the width of resection margin for solitary hepatocellular carcinoma

被引:1
|
作者
Jia-Shuo Chao [1 ]
Qi Zhu [1 ]
De-Sheng Chen [1 ]
Gui-Ming Chen [1 ]
Xue-Qian Xie [2 ]
Ai-Qun Liu [2 ]
Sen-Lin Zhao [3 ]
Hong-Cheng Sun [1 ]
机构
[1] Department of General Surgery,Shanghai General Hospital,Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine
[2] Department of Radiology,Shanghai General Hospital,Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine
[3] Department of Colorectal Surgery,Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R735.7 [肝肿瘤];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: The optimal width of resection margin(RM) for hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC) remains controversial. This study aimed to investigate the value of imaging tumor capsule(ITC) and imaging tumor size(ITS) in guiding RM width for patients with HCC. Methods: Patients who underwent hepatectomy for HCC in our center were retrospectively reviewed. ITC(complete/incomplete) and ITS( ≤ 3 cm/> 3 cm) were assessed by preoperative magnetic resonance imaging(MRI). Using subgroup analyses based on ITC and ITS, the impact of RM width [narrow RM( < 5 mm)/wide RM( ≥ 5 mm)] on recurrence-free survival(RFS), overall survival(OS), and RM recurrence was analyzed. Results: A total of 247 patients with solitary HCC were included. ITC and ITS were independent predictors for RFS and OS in the entire cohort. In patients with ITS ≤ 3 cm, neither ITC nor RM width showed a significant impact on prognosis, and the incidence of RM recurrence was comparable between the narrow RM and wide RM groups(15.6% vs. 4.3%, P = 0.337). In patients with ITS > 3 cm and complete ITC, the narrow RM group exhibited comparable RFS, OS, and incidence of RM recurrence with the wide RM group( P = 0.606, 0.916, and 0.649, respectively). However, in patients with ITS > 3 cm and incomplete ITC, the wide RM group showed better RFS and OS and a lower incidence of RM recurrence compared with the narrow RM group( P = 0.037, 0.018, and 0.046, respectively). Conclusions: As MRI-based preoperative markers, conjoint analysis of ITC with ITS aids in determining RM width for solitary HCC patients. Narrow RM is applicable in patients with ITS ≤ 3 cm regardless of ITC status and in those with ITS > 3 cm and complete ITC. Wide RM is preferred in those with ITS > 3 cm and incomplete ITC.
引用
收藏
页码:551 / 558
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Combined analysis of imaging tumor capsule with imaging tumor size guides the width of resection margin for solitary hepatocellular carcinoma
    Chao, Jia-Shuo
    Zhu, Qi
    Chen, De-Sheng
    Chen, Gui-Ming
    Xie, Xue-Qian
    Liu, Ai-Qun
    Zhao, Sen-Lin
    Sun, Hong-Cheng
    HEPATOBILIARY & PANCREATIC DISEASES INTERNATIONAL, 2022, 21 (06) : 551 - 558
  • [2] Prognostic Value of Combined Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio and Imaging Tumor Capsule in Solitary Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients after Narrow-Margin Hepatectomy
    Chen, Desheng
    Mao, Pengjuan
    Sun, Chen
    Fan, Xuhui
    Zhu, Qi
    Chen, Zeping
    He, Zeping
    Lou, Yichao
    Sun, Hongcheng
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2024, 13 (02)
  • [3] Hepatectomy for Solitary Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Resection Margin Width Does Not Predict Survival
    Michelakos, Theodoros
    Kontos, Filippos
    Sekigami, Yurie
    Qadan, Motaz
    Cai, Lei
    Catalano, Onofrio
    Deshpande, Vikram
    Patel, Madhukar S.
    Yamada, Teppei
    Elias, Nahel
    Dageforde, Leigh Anne
    Kimura, Shoko
    Kawai, Tatsuo
    Tanabe, Kenneth K.
    Markmann, James F.
    Yeh, Heidi
    Ferrone, Cristina R.
    JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2021, 25 (07) : 1727 - 1735
  • [4] Hepatectomy for Solitary Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Resection Margin Width Does Not Predict Survival
    Theodoros Michelakos
    Filippos Kontos
    Yurie Sekigami
    Motaz Qadan
    Lei Cai
    Onofrio Catalano
    Vikram Deshpande
    Madhukar S. Patel
    Teppei Yamada
    Nahel Elias
    Leigh Anne Dageforde
    Shoko Kimura
    Tatsuo Kawai
    Kenneth K. Tanabe
    James F. Markmann
    Heidi Yeh
    Cristina R. Ferrone
    Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 2021, 25 : 1727 - 1735
  • [5] Hepatectomy for Solitary Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Resection Margin Width Does Not Predict Survival
    Michelakos, T.
    Kontos, F.
    Sekigami, Y.
    Deshpande, V.
    Tanabe, K. K.
    Elias, N.
    Yeh, H.
    Dageforde, L. A.
    Qadan, M.
    Ferrone, C. R.
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2020, 27 (SUPPL 1) : S111 - S112
  • [6] The Adequate Resection Margin of Hepatocellular Carcinoma According to the Tumor Microenvironment
    Kim, S. H.
    Kim, Y. T.
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2019, 26 : S206 - S206
  • [7] Importance of tumor size in resection strategies for hepatocellular carcinoma
    Rauchfuss, F.
    Settmacher, U.
    CHIRURG, 2016, 87 (12): : 1079 - 1079
  • [8] Tumor Size Drives the Prognosis After Hepatic Resection of Solitary Hepatocellular Carcinoma Without Vascular Invasion
    Shinkawa, Hiroji
    Tanaka, Shogo
    Takemura, Shigekazu
    Ishihara, Takuma
    Yamamoto, Kouji
    Kubo, Shoji
    JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2020, 24 (05) : 1040 - 1048
  • [9] Tumor Size Drives the Prognosis After Hepatic Resection of Solitary Hepatocellular Carcinoma Without Vascular Invasion
    Hiroji Shinkawa
    Shogo Tanaka
    Shigekazu Takemura
    Takuma Ishihara
    Kouji Yamamoto
    Shoji Kubo
    Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 2020, 24 : 1040 - 1048
  • [10] Minimum resection margin should be based on tumor size in hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma in hepatoviral infection patients
    Sasaki, Kazunari
    Matsuda, Masamichi
    Ohkura, Yu
    Kawamura, Yusuke
    Hashimoto, Masaji
    Ikeda, Kenji
    Kumada, Hiromitsu
    Watanabe, Goro
    HEPATOLOGY RESEARCH, 2013, 43 (12) : 1295 - 1303