Preoperative colonic stents vs emergency surgery for acute left-sided malignant colonic obstruction: meta-analysis with systematic review of the literature

被引:0
作者
Belinda De Simone [1 ]
Fausto Catena [1 ]
Federico Coccolini [2 ]
Salomone Di Saverio [3 ]
Massimo Sartelli [4 ]
Arianna Heyer [5 ]
Nicola De Angelis [6 ]
Gian Luigi De Angelis [7 ]
Luca Ansaloni [2 ]
机构
[1] Department of Emergency and Trauma Surgery,University Hospital of Parma
[2] Department of General and Emergency Surgery,Papa XXIII Hospital  3. Department of General Surgery,Maggiore Hospital of Bologna  4. Department of
关键词
Colonic stent; Self-expandable metallic stent; Obstructive left colon cancer; Emergency surgery; Endo-laparoscopic approach; Oncological outcome;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R735.3 [肠肿瘤];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
AIM To investigate by meta-analytic study and systematic review, advantages of colonic stent placement in comparison with emergency surgery.METHODS We conducted an extensive literature search by PubMed, Google Scholar, Embase and the Cochrane Libraries. We searched for all the papers in English published till February 2016, by applying combinations of the following terms: Obstructive colon cancer, colon cancer in emergency, colorectal stenting, emergency surgery for colorectal cancer, guidelines for obstructive colorectal cancer, stenting vs emergency surgery in the treatment of obstructive colorectal cancer, selfexpanding metallic stents, stenting as bridge to surgery. The study was designed following the PrismaStatement. By our search, we identified 452 studies, and 57 potentially relevant studies in full-text were reviewed by 2 investigators; ultimately, 9 randomized controlled trials were considered for meta-analysis and all the others were considered for systematic review.RESULTS In the meta-analysis, by comparing colonic stenting(CS) as bridge to surgery and emergency surgery, the pooled analysis showed no significant difference between the two techniques in terms of mortality [odds ratio(oR) = 0.91], morbidity(oR = 2.38) or permanent stoma rate(oR = 1.67); primary anastomosis was more frequent in the stent group(oR = 0.45; P = 0.004) and stoma creation was more frequent in the emergency surgery group(oR = 2.36; P = 0.002). No statistical difference was found in disease-free survival and overall survival. The pooled analysis showed a significant difference between the colonic stent and emergency surgery groups(oR = 0.37), with a significantly higher 1-year recurrence rate in the stent group(P = 0.007).CONCLUSION CS improves primary anastomosis rate with significantly high 1-year follow-up recurrence and no statistical difference in terms of disease-free survival and overall survival.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 13
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
[21]   Comparison of the prognosis of four different treatment strategies for acute left malignant colonic obstruction: a systematic review and network meta-analysis [J].
Tan, Ling ;
Liu, Zi-lin ;
Ran, Meng-ni ;
Tang, Ling-han ;
Pu, Yan-jun ;
Liu, Yi-lei ;
Ma, Zhou ;
He, Zhou ;
Xiao, Jiang-wei .
WORLD JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY SURGERY, 2021, 16 (01)
[22]   Surgical outcomes of colonic stents as a bridge to surgery versus emergency surgery for malignant colorectal obstruction: A systematic review and meta-analysis of high quality prospective and randomised controlled trials [J].
Spannenburg, Liam ;
Gonzalez, Mariana Sanchez ;
Brooks, Anastasia ;
Wei, Shujun ;
Li, Xinxing ;
Liang, Xiaowen ;
Gao, Wenchao ;
Wang, Haolu .
EJSO, 2020, 46 (08) :1404-1414
[23]   Deviating colostomy construction versus stent placement as bridge to surgery for malignant left-sided colonic obstruction [J].
Amelung, Femke J. ;
ter Borg, Frank ;
Consten, Esther C. J. ;
Siersema, Peter D. ;
Draaisma, Werner A. .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2016, 30 (12) :5345-5355
[24]   Is the ESGE guideline recommendation against the placement of stents for left-sided malignant colonic obstruction still open to debate? Reply [J].
Hassan, Cesare .
ENDOSCOPY, 2016, 48 (02) :200-200
[25]   Is Stenting as "a Bridge to Surgery" an Oncologically Safe Strategy for the Management of Acute, Left-Sided, Malignant, Colonic Obstruction? A Comparative Study With a Propensity Score Analysis [J].
Sabbagh, Charles ;
Browet, Francois ;
Diouf, Momar ;
Cosse, Cyril ;
Brehant, Olivier ;
Bartoli, Eric ;
Mauvais, Francois ;
Chauffert, Bruno ;
Dupas, Jean-Louis ;
Nguyen-Khac, Eric ;
Regimbeau, Jean-Marc .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2013, 258 (01) :107-115
[26]   A meta-analysis of endoscopic stenting as bridge to surgery versus emergency surgery for left-sided colorectal cancer obstruction [J].
De Ceglie, Antonella ;
Filiberti, Rosa ;
Baron, Todd H. ;
Ceppi, Marcello ;
Conio, Massimo .
CRITICAL REVIEWS IN ONCOLOGY HEMATOLOGY, 2013, 88 (02) :387-403
[27]   Long-term outcomes of colonic stent as a "bridge to surgery"for left-sided malignant large-bowel obstruction [J].
Mora-Lopez, L. ;
Hidalgo, M. ;
Falco, J. ;
Serra-Pla, Sh ;
Pallisera-Lloveras, A. ;
Garcia-Nalda, A. ;
Criado, E. ;
Navarro-Soto, S. ;
Serra-Aracil, X. .
SURGICAL ONCOLOGY-OXFORD, 2020, 35 :399-405
[28]   Emergency surgery for obstructing colonic cancer: a comparison between right-sided and left-sided lesions [J].
J.-L. Faucheron ;
B. Paquette ;
B. Trilling ;
B. Heyd ;
S. Koch ;
G. Mantion .
European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery, 2018, 44 :71-77
[29]   Emergency surgery for obstructing colonic cancer: a comparison between right-sided and left-sided lesions [J].
Faucheron, J. -L. ;
Paquette, B. ;
Trilling, B. ;
Heyd, B. ;
Koch, S. ;
Mantion, G. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF TRAUMA AND EMERGENCY SURGERY, 2018, 44 (01) :71-77
[30]   The use of self-expanding metallic stents in the management of benign colonic obstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Fardanesh, Armin ;
George, Jayan ;
Hughes, Daniel ;
Stavropoulou-Tatla, Stavroula ;
Mathur, Pawan .
TECHNIQUES IN COLOPROCTOLOGY, 2024, 28 (01)