Preoperative colonic stents vs emergency surgery for acute left-sided malignant colonic obstruction: meta-analysis with systematic review of the literature

被引:0
|
作者
Belinda De Simone [1 ]
Fausto Catena [1 ]
Federico Coccolini [2 ]
Salomone Di Saverio [3 ]
Massimo Sartelli [4 ]
Arianna Heyer [5 ]
Nicola De Angelis [6 ]
Gian Luigi De Angelis [7 ]
Luca Ansaloni [2 ]
机构
[1] Department of Emergency and Trauma Surgery,University Hospital of Parma
[2] Department of General and Emergency Surgery,Papa XXIII Hospital  3. Department of General Surgery,Maggiore Hospital of Bologna  4. Department of
关键词
Colonic stent; Self-expandable metallic stent; Obstructive left colon cancer; Emergency surgery; Endo-laparoscopic approach; Oncological outcome;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R735.3 [肠肿瘤];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
AIM To investigate by meta-analytic study and systematic review, advantages of colonic stent placement in comparison with emergency surgery.METHODS We conducted an extensive literature search by PubMed, Google Scholar, Embase and the Cochrane Libraries. We searched for all the papers in English published till February 2016, by applying combinations of the following terms: Obstructive colon cancer, colon cancer in emergency, colorectal stenting, emergency surgery for colorectal cancer, guidelines for obstructive colorectal cancer, stenting vs emergency surgery in the treatment of obstructive colorectal cancer, selfexpanding metallic stents, stenting as bridge to surgery. The study was designed following the PrismaStatement. By our search, we identified 452 studies, and 57 potentially relevant studies in full-text were reviewed by 2 investigators; ultimately, 9 randomized controlled trials were considered for meta-analysis and all the others were considered for systematic review.RESULTS In the meta-analysis, by comparing colonic stenting(CS) as bridge to surgery and emergency surgery, the pooled analysis showed no significant difference between the two techniques in terms of mortality [odds ratio(oR) = 0.91], morbidity(oR = 2.38) or permanent stoma rate(oR = 1.67); primary anastomosis was more frequent in the stent group(oR = 0.45; P = 0.004) and stoma creation was more frequent in the emergency surgery group(oR = 2.36; P = 0.002). No statistical difference was found in disease-free survival and overall survival. The pooled analysis showed a significant difference between the colonic stent and emergency surgery groups(oR = 0.37), with a significantly higher 1-year recurrence rate in the stent group(P = 0.007).CONCLUSION CS improves primary anastomosis rate with significantly high 1-year follow-up recurrence and no statistical difference in terms of disease-free survival and overall survival.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 13
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [2] Colonic stenting vs emergent surgery for acute left-sided malignant colonic obstruction: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Ye, Guang-Yao
    Cui, Zhe
    Chen, Lu
    Zhong, Ming
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2012, 18 (39) : 5608 - 5615
  • [3] The Safety and Efficiency of Surgery with Colonic Stents in Left-Sided Malignant Colonic Obstruction: A Meta-Analysis
    Zhao, Xiang
    Liu, Bo
    Zhao, Ende
    Wang, Jiliang
    Cai, Ming
    Xia, Zefeng
    Xia, Qinghua
    Shuai, Xiaoming
    Tao, Kaixiong
    Wang, Guobin
    Cai, Kailin
    GASTROENTEROLOGY RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2014, 2014
  • [4] Meta-Analysis of Complications of Colonic Stenting Versus Emergency Surgery for Acute Left-sided Malignant Colonic Obstruction
    Liu, Zhihua
    Kang, Liang
    Li, Chao
    Huang, Meijin
    Zhang, Xingwei
    Wang, Jianping
    SURGICAL LAPAROSCOPY ENDOSCOPY & PERCUTANEOUS TECHNIQUES, 2014, 24 (01) : 73 - 79
  • [5] Colonic stent for bridge to surgery for acute left-sided malignant colonic obstruction: A review of the literature after 2020
    Binetti, Margherita
    Lauro, Augusto
    Tonini, Valeria
    WORLD JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2022, 13 (12): : 957 - 966
  • [6] Transanal drainage tubes vs metallic stents for acute malignant left-sided bowel obstruction A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Xu, Jing
    Zhang, Shuai
    Jiang, Tao
    Zhao, Yong-Jie
    MEDICINE, 2020, 99 (02)
  • [7] Emergency preoperative stenting versus surgery for acute left-sided malignant colonic obstruction: a multicenter randomized controlled trial
    Pirlet, Isabelle A.
    Slim, Karem
    Kwiatkowski, Fabrice
    Michot, Francis
    Millat, Bertrand L.
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2011, 25 (06): : 1814 - 1821
  • [8] Emergency preoperative stenting versus surgery for acute left-sided malignant colonic obstruction: a multicenter randomized controlled trial
    Isabelle A. Pirlet
    Karem Slim
    Fabrice Kwiatkowski
    Francis Michot
    Bertrand L. Millat
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2011, 25 : 1814 - 1821
  • [9] Which treatment strategy is optimal for acute left-sided malignant colonic obstruction? A Bayesian meta-analysis
    Ouyang, Kaibo
    Yang, Zifeng
    Yang, Yuesheng
    Wang, Junjiang
    Wu, Deqing
    Li, Yong
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2023, 38 (01)
  • [10] Acute resection versus bridge to surgery with diverting colostomy for patients with acute malignant left sided colonic obstruction: Systematic review and meta-analysis
    Amelung, Femke J.
    Mulder, Charlotte L. J.
    Verheijen, Paul M.
    Draaisma, Werner A.
    Siersema, Peter D.
    Consten, Esther C. J.
    SURGICAL ONCOLOGY-OXFORD, 2015, 24 (04): : 313 - 321